Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy

Living Edition
| Editors: Marco Sgarbi

Telescope in Renaissance Science

  • Matteo Cosci
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_979-1

Abstract

The importance of the invention of telescope cannot be underestimated, neither regarding its instrumental value within the astronomic field during the “Scientific Revolution” (and uninterruptedly after) nor regarding its philosophical and symbolical significance in so far as it was a device – the first with such an impact on human knowledge – that was given credit for, and recognized as, being able of increasing natural perceptual capacity (i.e., sight), well beyond its contingent limits, even enhancing it to a level of improvement that was thought as impossible to reach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ariotti, Piero. 1975. Bonaventura Cavalieri, Marin Mersenne, and the reflecting telescope. Isis 66: 303–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biagioli, Mario. 2006. Galileo’s instruments of credit: Telescopes, images, secrecy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, Harold. 1985. Galileo on the telescope and the eye. Journal of the History of Ideas 46: 487–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bucciantini, Massimo, Michele Camerota, and Franco Giudice. 2012. Il telescopio di Galileo. Una storia europea. Torino: Einaudi. English edition: Bucciantini, Massimo, Michele Camerota, and Franco Giudice. 2015. Galileo’s telescope. A European story. Trans. C. Bolton. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Chapman, Allan. 1996. The astronomical work of Thomas Harriot (1560–1621). Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 36: 97–107.Google Scholar
  6. Drake, Stillman. 1970. Galileo and the telescope. In Galileo studies, ed. Stillman Drake, 140–155. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  7. Drake, Stillman. 1976. The unsung journalist and the origin of the telescope. Los Angeles: Zeitlin and Ver Brugge.Google Scholar
  8. Drake, Stillman. 1983. Telescopes, tides, and tactics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dupré, Sven. 2000. Mathematical instruments and the ‘Theory of the concave spherical Mirror’: Galileo’s optics beyond art and science. Nuncius 15: 551–588.Google Scholar
  10. Dupré, Sven. 2002. Galileo, the telescope, and the science of optics in the sixteenth century. Doctoral thesis, University of Ghent.Google Scholar
  11. Dupré, Sven. 2003. Galileo’s telescope and celestial light. Journal for the History of Astronomy 34: 369–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dupré, Sven. 2005. Ausonio’s mirrors and Galileo’s lenses: The telescope and sixteenth-century practical optical knowledge. Galilaeana 2: 145–180.Google Scholar
  13. Greco, Vincenzo, et al. 1993. Telescopes of Galileo. Applied Optics 32: 6219–6226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Houzeau, Jean-Claude. 1882. Le téléscope à Bruxelles, au printemps de 1609. Ciel et Terre 3: 25–28.Google Scholar
  15. Ilardi, Vincent. 2007. Renaissance vision from spectacles to telescope. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
  16. King, H.C. 1955. The history of the telescope. London: C. Griffin.Google Scholar
  17. Malett, Antoni. 2005. Early conceptualizations of the telescope as an optical instrument. Early Science and Medicine 10 [Optics, instruments and painting, 1420–1720 reflections on the Hockney-Falco thesis]: 237–262.Google Scholar
  18. Miniati, M., A. Van Helden, V. Greco, and G. Molesini. 2002. Seventeenth-century telescope optics of Torricelli, Divini, and Campani. Applied Optics 41: 644–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Molesini, Giuseppe, and Vincenzo Greco. 1996. Galileo Galilei: Research and Development of the telescope. In Trends in optics: Research, developments and applications, ed. Anna Consortini, 423–438. St. Louis: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Palladini, Franco. 1987. Un trattato sulla costruzione del cannocchiale ai tempi di Galilei: Principi matematici e problemi tecnologici. Nouvelles de la République des Lettres I: 83–102.Google Scholar
  21. Rienitz, Joachim. 1993. “Make glasses to see the moon large”: An attempt to outline the early history of the telescope. Bulletin of the Scientific Instrument Society 37: 7–9.Google Scholar
  22. Reeves, Eileen. 2008. Galileo’s glassworks. The telescope and the mirror. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ronan, Colin A. 1991a. Leonard and Thomas Digges. Journal of British Astronomical Association 101: 91–94.Google Scholar
  24. Ronan, Colin A. 1991b. The origins of the reflecting telescope. Journal of the British Astronomical Association 101: 335–342.Google Scholar
  25. Ronan, Colin A. 1993a. There was an Elizabethan telescope. Bulletin of the Scientific Instrument Society 37: 2–3.Google Scholar
  26. Ronan, Colin A. 1993b. The invention of the reflecting telescope. In Yearbook of Astronomy, ed. Patrick Moore, 129–140. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  27. Ronchi, Vasco. 1923. Sopra i cannocchiali di Galileo. L’Universo 4: 791–804.Google Scholar
  28. Smith, A. Mark. 2001. Practice vs theory: The background to Galileo’s telescope work. Atti della Fondazione Giorgio Ronchi 1: 149–162.Google Scholar
  29. Turner, Gerard L’.E. 1995. There was no Elizabethan telescope. Bulletin of the Scientific Instrument Society 37: 3–5.Google Scholar
  30. Strano, Giorgio, ed. 2008. Il telescopio di Galileo. Lo strumento che ha cambiato il mondo. Firenze: Giunti.Google Scholar
  31. Sluiter, Engel. 1997. The telescope before Galileo. Journal for the History of Astronomy 28: 223–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Swerdlow, Noel. 1998. Galileo’s discoveries with the telescope and their evidence for the Copernican theory. In The Cambridge companion to Galileo, ed. Peter Machamer, 244–270. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Turner, Anthony J. 1984. The prehistory, origins, and development of the reflecting telescope. Bollettino del Centro internazionale ‘A. Beltrame’ di Storia dello Spazio e del tempo 3–4: 11–22.Google Scholar
  34. van Helden, Albert. 1977. The invention of the telescope. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
  35. van Helden, Albert. 2009. The beginnings, from Lipperhey to Huygens and Cassini. Experimental Astronomy 25: 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. van Helden, Albert, Sven Duprè, Rob van Gent, and Huib Zuidervaart. 2010. The origins of the telescope. Amsterdam: KNAW Press.Google Scholar
  37. Watson, Fred. 2004. Stargazer. The life and times of the telescope. Allen & Unwin: Crows Nest.Google Scholar
  38. Whitaker, Ewen A. 1993. The Digges-Bourne telescope: An alternative possibility. Journal of the British Astronomical Association 103: 310–312.Google Scholar
  39. Willach, Rolf. 2008. The long route to the invention of the telescope. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
  40. Zik, Yaakov. 1999. Galileo and the telescope: The status of theoretical and practical knowledge and techniques of measurement and experimentation in the development of the instrument. Nuncius 14: 31–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zik, Yaakov. 2001. Science and instruments: The telescope as a scientific instrument at the beginning of the seventeenth century. Perspectives on Science 9: 259–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zik, Yaakov, and Albert Van Helden. 2003. Between discovery and disclosure: Galileo and the telescope. In Musa Musaei, ed. Marco Bereta et al., 173–190. Leo S. Olschki: Firenze.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Università Ca’ Foscari VeneziaVeniceItaly

Section editors and affiliations

  • Matteo Valleriani
    • 1
  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for the History of ScienceBerlinGermany