Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy

Living Edition
| Editors: Marco Sgarbi

Historiography, Renaissance

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_583-1


As scholars and Humanists in the Renaissance were busy rediscovering Classical texts and deepening their awareness of ancient culture, they were also delving into the emerging nuances of historiography. Not only were intellectuals interested with preserving the events and memories of the past, but they were also interested in how this was performed. Ancient scholars, along with writers throughout the Middle Ages, certainly contributed to this discussion by placing a value on eye-witness accounts and facts based on human events (as opposed to mythological events).

The rediscovery of such texts by Renaissance intellectuals allowed this discussion of historical methodology to thrive and develop further. It was these scholars, devoted to rhetoric and its utility in creating didactic texts, who gave historiography a platform during the fifteenth, sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. By definition, Historiography concerns itself with the study of history – not simply the works produced by historians, but the methodology of said historians as well. What is considered an acceptable source? What would adequate verification of that source look like? Does one use narrative, poetry, a speech or another form of writing to convey the historical subject matter they have in mind? These questions, among others, were tackled by multiple authors during the Renaissance.

This entry seeks to give the reader a general introduction to historiography, as well as the environment which so greatly fostered its development during the Renaissance.


Historical Subject Matter Renaissance Historiography Renaissance Scholars Francesco Guicciardini Thucydides 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Beaney, Michael. 2014. Conceptions of analysis in analytical philosophy. Supplement to Beaney, Michael. 2014. “Analysis.” Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.) http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/analysis/s6.html#7
  2. Burke, Peter. 2013. Metahistory: Before and after. Rethinking History 17 (4): 437–447.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2013.825081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cabrini, Anna Maria. 1990. Le Historiae del Bruni: Risultati e ipotesi di una ricerca sulle fonti. In Leonardo Bruni, Cancelliere della repubblica di Firenze, ed. Paolo Viti. Florence: Olschki.Google Scholar
  4. Cochrane, Eric. 1981. Historians and historiography in the Italian renaissance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fubini, Riccardo. 2003. Storiografia dell’umanesimo in Italia da Leonardo Bruni ad Annio da Viterbo. Rome: Edizioni di storia e letteratura.Google Scholar
  6. Grafton, Anthony. 2007. What was history? The art of history in early modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Ianziti, Gary. 2012. Writing history in renaissance Italy: Leonardo Bruni and uses of the past. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lloyd, James. 2012. Thucydides. Ancient history encyclopedia. http://www.ancient.eu/Thucydides/.
  9. Mark, Joshua J. 2009. Herodotus. Ancient history encyclopedia. http://www.ancient.eu/herodotus/.
  10. Popkin, Jeremy D. 2016. From Herodotus to H-net: The story of historiography. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Romano, Anonimo. 1981. Cronica. Edited by Giuseppe Porta. 3rd ed. Milano: Adelphi Edizioni.Google Scholar
  12. Spiegel, Gabrielle M. 1993. Romancing the past: The rise of vernacular prose historiography in thirteenth-century France. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Spiegel, Gabrielle M. 1997. The past as text: The theory and practice of medieval historiography. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  14. The Institute of Historical Research. 2008. Linguistic turn. Making history: The changing face of the profession in Britain. http://www.history.ac.uk/makinghistory/themes/linguistic_turn.html.
  15. White, Hayden. 1973. Metahistory. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Independent ScholarEagleUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Teodoro Katinis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Literary StudiesGhent UniversityGhentBelgium