Encyclopedia of Geodesy

Living Edition
| Editors: Erik Grafarend

Disturbing Potential from Deflections of the Vertical: From Globally Reflected Surface Gradient Equation to Locally Oriented Multiscale Modeling Multiscale modeling

  • Willi Freeden
  • Christian Gerhards
  • Helga Nutz
  • Michael Schreiner
Living reference work entry

Later version available View entry history

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02370-0_126-1

Definition

Deflection of the Vertical

Difference between the direction of the normal vector associated with the reference potential and the normal vector associated with the (actual) gravity potential.

Disturbing Potential

Difference between the normal potential and the true (measured) potential.

Introduction

The force of gravity, i.e., the resultant of gravitational and centrifugal force, provides a directional structure to the space above the Earth’s surface. It is tangential to the vertical plumb lines and perpendicular to all (level) equipotential surfaces. Any water surface at rest is part of a level surface. Level (equipotential) surfaces are ideal reference surfaces, for example, for heights. The geoid is defined as that level surface of the gravity field which best fits the mean sea level. Gravity vectors can be measured by absolute or relative gravimeters. The highest accuracy relative gravity measurements are conducted at the Earth’s surface. Gravity data are converted into...

Keywords

Gravity Anomaly Mantle Plume Beltrami Operator Surface Gradient Reference Ellipsoid 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References and Reading

  1. Bruns, E. H., 1878. Die Figur der Erde. Berlin: P. Stankiewicz Buchdruckerei.Google Scholar
  2. Fehlinger, T., 2009. Multiscale Formulations for the Disturbing Potential and the Deflections of the Vertical in Locally Reflected Physical Geodesy. PhD thesis, University of Kaiserslautern, Geomathematics Group.Google Scholar
  3. Freeden, W., 1979. Über eine Klasse von Integralformeln der Mathematischen Geodäsie. Veröff Geod Inst RWTH Aachen, 27. Habilitation Thesis.Google Scholar
  4. Freeden, W., 2015. Geomathematics: its role, its aim, and its potential. In Freeden, W., Nashed, Z., and Sonar, T. (eds.), Handbook of Geomathematics, 2nd edn, p 3–78. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Freeden, W., and Gerhards, C., 2012. Geomathematically Oriented Potential Theory. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Freeden, W., and Maier, T., 2003. Spectral and multiscale signal-to-noise thresholding of spherical vector fields. Computational Geosciences, 7, 215–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Freeden, W., and Schreiner, M., 2006. Local multiscale modelling of geoid undulations from deflections of the vertical. Journal of Geodesy, 79, 641–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Freeden, W., and Schreiner, M., 2009. Spherical Functions of Mathematical Geosciences – A Scalar, Vectorial and Tensorial Setup. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Freeden, W., Gervens, T., and Schreiner, M., 1998. Constructive Approximation on the Sphere (With Applications to Geomathematics). Oxford: Oxford Science Publications/Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  10. Grafarend, E. W., Klapp, M., and Martinec, Z., 2015. Spacetime modeling of the Earth’s gravity field by ellipsoidal harmonics. In Freeden, W., Nashed, Z., and Sonar, T. (eds.), Handbook of Geomathematics, 2nd edn, p 381–496. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Heiskanen, W. A., and Moritz, H., 1967. Physical Geodesy. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  12. Hofmann-Wellenhof, B., and Moritz, H., 2006. Physical Geodesy, 2nd edn, p 253–290 Wien/New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Jekeli, C., 1999. An analysis of deflections of the vertical derived from high-degree spherical harmonic models. Journal of Geodesy, 73, 10–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pick, M., Pícha, J., and Vyskočil, V., 1973. Theory of the Earth’s Gravity Field. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific.Google Scholar
  15. Torge, W., 1991. Geodesy, 2nd edn. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Willi Freeden
    • 1
  • Christian Gerhards
    • 2
  • Helga Nutz
    • 1
  • Michael Schreiner
    • 3
  1. 1.Geomathematics GroupUniversity of KaiserslauternKaiserslauternGermany
  2. 2.Computational Science CenterUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
  3. 3.Institute for Computational Engineering ICEUniversity of BuchsBuchsSwitzerland