Researching Learners’ and Teachers’ Beliefs About Language Learning Using Metaphor

  • Linda Fisher
Living reference work entry
Part of the Encyclopedia of Language and Education book series (ELE)


Due to the potentially powerful influence of beliefs on actions, research in SLA has focused increasingly on the beliefs of language learners and teachers and, more recently, on how such beliefs develop over time in particular contexts and as a result of social interaction. However, not least because they are mutable and because we are often not aware of the ways in which they influence us, belief has been recognized as a complex construct for investigation. In offering a way to expose thinking that may otherwise be difficult to articulate, metaphor also entails social and affective dimensions, which makes it apposite for beliefs research. Either by analyzing the metaphors that people use in naturally occurring oral or written discourse, or by eliciting metaphors from them through task completion exercises, researchers have been able to examine the ways in which people conceptualize themselves as language learners, the language learning experience, and their understanding of the role of the languages teacher. The chapter presents beliefs research that has employed metaphor in a variety of second language educational settings and explores the methodological problems that metaphor studies must address. Future research directions are explored, namely, further work on how metaphor develops in social settings, and research into how it might be used to shape beliefs to improve language learning outcomes.


Beliefs Cognition Emotion Language learning Learners Metaphor Teachers 


  1. Barcelos, A., & Kalaja, P. (2011). Beliefs about SLA revisited. System, 39(3), 281–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Block, D. (1992). Metaphors we teach and learn by. Prospect, 7(3), 42–55.Google Scholar
  3. Block, D. (1999). Who framed SLA research? Problem framing and metaphoric accounts of the SLA research process. In L. Cameron & G. Low (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp. 135–148). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borg, S. (2011). The impact of in-service teacher education on language teachers’ beliefs. System, 39(3), 370–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cameron, L. (1999). Operationalising ‘metaphor’ for applied linguistic research. In L. Cameron & G. Low (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp. 3–28). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  8. Cameron, L. (2010). What is metaphor and why does it matter? In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities (pp. 3–25). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
  9. Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (1999). Bridges to learning: metaphors of teaching, learning and language. In L. Cameron & G. Low (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp. 149–176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Guerrero, M., & Villamil, O. (2002). Metaphorical conceptualisations of ESL teaching and learning. Language Teaching Research, 6(2), 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellis, R. (2001). The metaphorical constructions of second language learners. In M. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: new directions in research (pp. 65–85). Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
  12. Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analysing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Farrell, T. S. C. (2006). ‘The teacher is an octopus’: Uncovering preservice English language teachers’ prior beliefs through metaphor analysis. RELC Journal, 37, 239–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fiedler, K., & Bless, H. (2000). The formation of beliefs at the interface of affective and cognitive processes. In N. Frijda, A. Manstead, & S. Bem (Eds.), Emotions and beliefs: how feelings influence thoughts (pp. 144–170). Cambridge: CUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fisher, L. (2013). Discerning change in young students’ beliefs about their language learning through the use of metaphor elicitation in the classroom. Research Papers in Education, 28(3), 373–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gibbs, R. (2008). Metaphor and thought. The state of the art. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 17–38). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Giddens, A. (1982). Profiles and critiques in social theory. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holme, R. (2004). Mind, metaphor and language teaching. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Horwitz, E. K. (1988). The beliefs about language learning of beginning foreign language students. Modern Language Journal, 72(3), 283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Horwitz, E. K. (1999). Cultural and situational influences on foreign language learners’ beliefs about language learning: a review of BALLI studies. System, 27(4), 557–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kramsch, C. (2003). Metaphor and the subjective construction. In P. Kalaja & A. Barcelos (Eds.), Beliefs about SLA: new research approaches (pp. 109–128). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Lakoff, G. (2008). The neural theory of metaphor. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 17–38). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Low, G. D. (2008). Metaphor and education. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 212–231). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Low, G. D., Todd, Z., Deignan, A., & Cameron, L. (Eds.). (2010). Researching and applying metaphor in the real world. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  27. Low, G. D. (2015). A practical validation model for researching elicited metaphor. In W. Wan & G. D. Low (Eds.), Elicited metaphor analysis in educational discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  28. Mercer, S. (2011). Language learner self-concept: complexity, continuity and change. System, 39(3), 335–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nikitina, L., & Furuoka, F. (2006). Re-examination of Horwitz’s beliefs about language learning inventory (BALLI) in the Malaysian context. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 3(2), 209–219.Google Scholar
  30. Oxford, R., Tomlinson, S., Barcelos, A., Harrington, C., Lavine, R., Saleh, A., & Longhini, A. (1998). Clashing metaphors about classroom teachers: Towards a systematic typology for the language teaching field. System, 26(1), 3–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Seferoğlu, G., Korkmazgil, S., & Ölçü, Z. (2009). Gaining insights into teachers’ ways of thinking via metaphors. Educational Studies, 35(3), 323–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Todd, Z., & Low, G. (2010). A selective survey of research practice in published studies using metaphor analysis. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities (pp. 26–43). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
  33. Wan, W., Low, G., & Li, M. (2011). From students’ and teachers’ perspectives: Metaphor analysis of beliefs about EFL teachers’ roles. System, 39(3), 403–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wan, W. (2014). Constructing and developing ESL students’ beliefs about writing through metaphor: An exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 23, 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zapata, G. C., & Lacorte, M. (2007). Preservice and inservice instructors’ metaphorical constructions of second language teachers. Foreign Language Annals, 40(3), 521–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations