Advertisement

Eye-Tracking Research in Computer-Mediated Language Learning

  • Marije C. MichelEmail author
  • Bryan Smith
Reference work entry
Part of the Encyclopedia of Language and Education book series (ELE)

Abstract

Though eye-tracking technology has been used in reading research for over 100 years, researchers have only recently begun to use it in studies of computer-assisted language learning (CALL). This chapter provides an overview of eye-tracking research to date, which is relevant to computer-mediated language learning contexts. We first examine some of the foundational work, basic assumptions and key constructs in eye-tracking research and then explore uses of eye-tracking in second language (L2) educational contexts. We then examine the modest but growing amount of research in CALL settings and illustrate the technique’s facility for contributing to SLA-relevant CALL research. We touch on some of the known CALL-relevant eye-tracking research in progress and also discuss some of the challenges researchers are likely to encounter when employing eye-tracking techniques. We end with a discussion of possible future directions and developments for eye-tracking in CALL settings.

Keywords

Eye-tracking Computer-assisted language learning (CALL) Second language acquisition Human-computer interaction (HCI) Noticing Awareness Saccades Task complexity 

References

  1. Bax, S. (2013). The cognitive processing of candidates during reading tests: Evidence from eye-tracking. Language Testing, 30(4), 441–465. doi: 10.1177/0265532212473244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boers, F., Warren, P., Siyanova, A., & Grimshaw, G. (2015. The effect of different types of glosses on learners’ intake of new words during reading. Paper presented at the Sixth International 0043onference on Task-Based Language Teaching. Leuven, Belgium, September 2015.Google Scholar
  3. Brunfaut, T., & McCray, G. (2015). Looking into test-takers’ cognitive processing whilst completing reading tasks: A mixed-methods eye-tracking and stimulated recall study. British Council ARAG Research Reports Online, 1(1). London: British Council. ISSN 2057-5203.Google Scholar
  4. Dussias, P. (2010). Uses of eye-tracking data in second language sentence processing research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 149–166. doi: 10.1017/S026719051000005X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dussias, P. E., Valdés Kroff, J. R., Guzzardo Tamargo, R. E., & Gerfen, C. (2013). When gender and looking go hand in hand. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 353–387. doi: 10.1017/S0272263112000915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gilabert, R., & Vasylets, L. (2015). The EFL learning potential of in- and out-of-school exposure, with a focus on undubbed videos. Effects of age, proficiency and cognitive differences. Project led by Carmen Muñoz, GRAL group (Grup de Rercerca en Adquisició de Llengües - Language Acquisition Research Group) at the University of Barcelona. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
  7. Godfroid, A., & Uggen, M. (2013). Attention to irregular verbs by beginning learners of German: An eye movement study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 291–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Godfroid, A., Housen, A., & Boers, F. (2010). A procedure for testing the noticing hypothesis in the context of vocabulary acquisition. In M. Pütz & L. Sicola (Eds.), Cognitive processing in second language acquisition (pp. 169–197). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Godfroid, A., Boers, F., & Housen, A. (2013). An eye for words: Gauging the role of attention in incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition by means of eye-tracking. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 483–517. doi: 10.1017/S0272263113000119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hyönä, J. (2010). The use of eye movements in the study of multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 172–176. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixation to comprehension Psychological Review, 87(4), 329–354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.87.4.329 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kuhn, J. (2012). The noticing of correct and incorrect forms in lengthier texts: An ESL eye-tracking investigation. In G. Kessler, A. Oskoz, & I. Elola (Eds.), Technology across writing contexts and tasks (pp. 237–253). San Marcos: CALICO.Google Scholar
  13. Lai, M.-L., Tsai, M.-J., Yang, F.-Y., Hsu, C.-Y., Liu, T.-C., Lee, S. W.-Y., et al. (2013). A review of using eye-tracking technology in exploring learning from 2000 to 2012. Educational Research Review, 10, 90–115. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2013.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Latimer, N. (2015). Cognitive processes in reading-into writing tasks. Paper presented at the CRELLA/Lancaster Eye-Tracking Research Seminar, 18 June 2015. University of Bedfordshire.Google Scholar
  15. Michel, M., & Smith, B. (2017). Measuring lexical alignment during L2 online peer interaction – an eye tracking study. In S. Gass, P. Spinner, & J. Behney (Eds.), Salience in second language acquisition. London/New York: Routeledge.Google Scholar
  16. Michel, M., Gilabert, R., & Révész, A. (2015) Eye-tracking and stimulated recall as means of investigating cognitive load and processes during L2 tasks.Google Scholar
  17. Montero Perez, M., Peters, E., & Desmet, P. (2015). Enhancing vocabulary learning through captioned video: An eye-tracking study (2015). The Modern Language Journal, 99, 308328. doi: 10.1111/modl.12215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. O’Rourke, B. (2008). The other C in CMC: What alternative data sources can tell us about text based synchronous computer mediated communication and language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21, 227–251. doi: 10.1080/09588220802090253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. O’Rourke, B. (2012). Using eye-tracking to investigate gaze behaviour in synchronous computer-mediated communication for language learning. In M. Dooley & R. O’Dowd (Eds.), Researching online interaction and exchange in foreign language education: Methods and issues (pp. 305–341). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  20. Örnberg Berglund, T. (2012). Corrective feedback and noticing in text-based second language interaction. In L. Bradley & S. Thouësny (Eds.), CALL: Using, Learning, Knowing, EUROCALL Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden, 22-25 August 2012, Proceedings. Dublin Ireland: Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2012.9781908416032
  21. Örnberg Berglund, T. (2013). Text-based chat and language learning. Opportunities and challenges. In A. Sundberg, C. Rosén, & P. Simfors (Eds.), ASLA 2012 Proceedings. Linköping, Sweden.Google Scholar
  22. Poole, A., & Ball, L. J. (2006). Eye-tracking in HCI and usability research. In Encyclopedia of human computer interaction (pp. 211–219). Hershey: Idea Group Reference, cop.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Prendergast, C. (2011). A Study of Negotiation Routines in SCMC NS-NNS tandem sessions using Eye Tracker Gaze Data. Final Year Project BA Computer Science, Linguistics and a Language. Trinity College University of Dublin. Retrieved August 2015 from https://www.cs.tcd.ie/undergraduate/computer-science-language/bacsll_web/Claire.Prendergast.1011.fyp.pdf
  24. Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457–1506. doi: 10.1080/17470210902816461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Révész, A., Sachs, R., & Hama, M. (2014). The effects of task complexity and input frequency on the acquisition of the past counterfactual construction through recasts. Language Learning, 64, 615–650. doi: 10.1111/lang.12061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Révész, A., Michel, M., & Lee, M. (2016a). Report on the project 'Investigating IELTS Academic Writing Task 2: Relationships between cognitive writing processes, text quality, and working memory'. British Council. IELTS Research Report Series.Google Scholar
  27. Révész, A., Michel, M., & Gilabert, R. (2016b). Measuring cognitive task demands using dual task methodology, subjective self-ratings, and expert judgments: a validation study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 703–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Roberts, L., & Siyanova-Chanturia, A. (2013). Using eye-tracking to investigate topics in L2 acquisition and L2 processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 213–235. doi: 10.1017/S0272263112000861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sagarra, N., & Ellis, N. C. (2013). From seeing adverbs to seeing morphology. Language experience and adult acquisition of L2 tense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 261–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith, B. (2010). Employing eye-tracking technology in researching the effectiveness of recasts in CMC. In F. M. Hult (Ed.), Directions and prospects for educational linguistics (pp. 79–98). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith, B. (2012). Eye-tracking as a measure of noticing. A study of explicit recasts in SCMC. Language Learning and Technology, 16(3), 53–81. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2012/smith.pdf.Google Scholar
  33. Smith, B., & Renaud, C. (2013). Eye-tracking as a measure of noticing corrective feedback. In computer- mediated instructor-student foreign language conferences. In K. McDonough & A. Mackey (Eds.), Interaction in diverse educational settings (pp. 147–165). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  34. Stickler, U., & Shi, L. (2015). Eye movements of online Chinese learners. CALICO Journal, 32(1), 52–81.Google Scholar
  35. Suvorov, R. (2013). Interacting with visuals in L2 listening tests: An eye-tracking study. Graduate theses and dissertations. Paper 13299. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/13299
  36. van Gog, T., & Scheiter, K. (2010). Eye-tracking as a tool to study and enhance multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20, 95–99. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Winke, P. (2013). The effects of input enhancement on grammar learning and comprehension: A modified replication of Lee, 2007, with eye-movement data. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 323–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Winke, P., Gass, S., & Sydorenko, T. (2013). Factors influencing the use of captions by foreign language learners: An eye-tracking study. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 254–275. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01432.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Linguistics and English LanguageLancaster UniversityLancasterUK
  2. 2.Arizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations