Skip to main content

The Worldwide Specter of Neoliberalism and the “Neoliberalization” of Educational Leaders

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 52 Accesses

Abstract

The hegemonic tendencies of neoliberalism as a political rationality informs a significant segment of the educational leadership literature. From within this field, this chapter draws mainly from authors who provide critique of the marketization of education and the concomitant narrowing of its purposes. While these writings are susceptible to “bulldozer” portrayals of the inevitability of neoliberalism’s global dominance (Larner, 2003), it is argued that, in its subject forming work, neoliberalism may also be usefully characterized as a “specter” – a haunting and insistent presence that becomes constitutively powerful as it insinuates its way into the thoughts and practices of educational leaders. In a shift from this spectral reading to a more tangible and scrutinizable representation, neoliberalism is conceived as a “political rationality” that intertwines with specific “technologies” and “freedoms” of government to make governing thinkable and practical, while judging the conduct of “economized” subjects (Brown, 2015) as reasonable and knowable according to the truth claims it promulgates. These power/knowledge arrangements are given expression in the idealized form of homo œconomicus before attention shifts from the constitutive triumph of neoliberal subjectivity to the more diverse and localized possibilities held in Foucault’s governmentality and in “neoliberalization” as a subject forming process. A “processual” reading of neoliberalism is taken to highlight its variegated, contingent, and inconsistent qualities and, by extension, illuminating how educational leaders might engage in a struggle to occupy different subject positions and to work at and beyond the limits of the currently dominant discursive order. Various theoretical, rhetorical and practical resources – configured as “struggle tactics” – are described and the risks and possibilities of their individual and collective deployment are evaluated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Anderson, G. L., Cohen, M. I., & Seraus, M. (2015). Urban leadership, neoliberalism, and new policy entrepreneurs: Merging leadership with resistance. In M. E. A. Khalifa (Ed.), Handbook of urban educational leadership (pp. 350–361). Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, P. L. J. (2013). The policy dispositif: Historical formation and method. Journal of Education Policy, 28(6), 807–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093022000043065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (2006). Education policy and social class the selected works of Stephen J. Ball. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J., & Olmedo, A. (2013). Care of the self, resistance and subjectivity under neoliberal governmentalities. Critical Studies in Education, 54(1), 85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, A. (2017). Accentuating the negative: Wendy Brown's Undoing the Demos. European Political Science, 16, 277–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, M. (2016). Neoliberalism, governmental assemblages, and the ethnographic imaginary. In M. Brady & R. K. Lippert (Eds.), Governing practices: Neoliberalism, governmentality, and the ethnographic imaginary (1st ed., pp. 3–31). Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N., Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). Variegated neoliberalization: Geographies, modalities, pathways. Global Networks, 10(2), 182–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. New York, NY: Zone Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2004). What is critique? An essay on Foucault’s virtue. In S. Salih (Ed.), The Judith Butler reader (pp. 302–321). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen, L. (2018). What is political rationality? Parrhesia, 29, 125–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danisch, R. (2017). Rhetorical agency in a neoliberal age: Foucault, power, agency, and ethos. In K. H. Nguyen (Ed.), Rhetoric in neoliberalism (pp. 63–85). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2014). The new way of the world: On neoliberal society. London, UK: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, A. I. (2011). In praise of counter-conduct. History of the Human Sciences, 24(4), 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Lissovoy, N. (2016). Education and emancipation in the neoliberal era: Being, teaching, and power. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. (2017). Neo-liberalism and our demons. European Political Science, 16, 264–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Death, C. (2016). Counter-conducts as a mode of resistance: Ways of “not being like that” in South Africa. Global Society, 30(2), 201–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeMatthews, D. E., Mungal, A. S., & Carrola, P. A. (2015). Despite best intentions: A critical analysis of social justice leadership and decision making. Administrative Issues Journal, 5(2), 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demetriou, O. (2016). Counter-conduct and the everyday: Anthropological engagements with philosophy. Global Society, 30(2), 218–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, C. (2020). Paradox and the school leader: The struggle for the soul of the principal in neoliberal times. Singapore: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London, UK: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London, UK: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality. Volume 1, an introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York, NY: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1984). What is enlightenment? In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader (pp. 32–50). New York, NY: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault. London, UK: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1997a). For an ethics of discomfort. In S. Lotringer (Ed.), The politics of truth (pp. 121–128). Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1997b). What is critique? In S. Lotringer & L. Hochroth (Eds.), The politics of truth (pp. 23–82). Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–78. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2014). On the government of the living: lectures at the Collège de France, 1979–1980 (G. Burchell, Trans., M. Senellart, Ed.). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon, S., & Collinson, D. (2014). Rethinking global leadership development programmes: The interrelated significance of power, context and identity. Organization Studies, 35(5), 645–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobby, B. (2017). Problematisations, practices and subjectivation. In G. Lakomski, S. Eacott, & C. W. Evers (Eds.), Questioning leadership: New directions for educational organisations (pp. 86–99). London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, C. (1991). Governmental rationality: An introduction. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 1–52). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamann, T. H. (2009). Neoliberalism, governmentality, and ethics. Foucault Studies, 6, 37–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heffernan, A. (2019). The ‘punk rock principal’: a metaphor for rethinking educational leadership. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 51(2), 117–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, V., & Larner, W. (2010). Calculating the social. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickert, W. (1995). Steering at a distance: A new paradigm of public governance in Dutch higher education. Governance, 8(1), 135–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotsko, A. (2017). Neoliberalism’s Demons. Theory & Event, 20(2), 493–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larner, W. (2003). Neoliberalism? Guest editorial. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 21, 509–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leask, I. (2012). Beyond subjection: Notes on the later Foucault and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(s1), 57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, T. (2012). Foucault, governmentality, and critique. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B., & Sellar, S. (2013). ‘Catalyst data’: Perverse systemic effects of audit and accountability in Australian schooling. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 634–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzini, D. (2016). From counter-conduct to critical attitude: Michel Foucault and the art of not being governed quite so much. Foucault Studies, 21, 7–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (2000). Which ethics for democracy? In M. Garber, B. Hanssen, & R. Walkowitz (Eds.), The turn to ethics (pp. 99–108). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the world politically. London, UK: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, E. (2008). Resisting Foucauldian ethics: Associative politics and the limits of the care of the self. Contemporary Political Theory, 7(2), 125–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, K. H. (2017). Rhetoric in neoliberalism. In Rhetoric in neoliberalism (pp. 1–14). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicoll, K., & Fejes, A. (2008). Mobilizing Foucault in studies of lifelong learning. In A. Fejes & K. Nicoll (Eds.), Foucault and lifelong learning: Governing the subject (pp. 1–18). London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niesche, R. (2013). Foucault, counter-conduct and school leadership as a form of political subjectivity. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 45(2), 144–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niesche, R., & Gowlett, C. (2015). Advocating a post-structuralist politics for educational leadership. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(4), 372–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2002). Neoliberalizing space. Antipode, 34(3), 380–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, K. R. (2006). Rhetorical maneuvers: Subjectivity, power, and resistance. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 39(4), 310–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pignatelli, F. (2002). Mapping the terrain of a Foucauldian ethics: A response to the surveillance of schooling. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 21(2), 157–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramey, J. (2015). Neoliberalism as a political theology of chance: the politics of divination. Palgrave Communications, 1(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. S. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. S., O’Malley, P., & Valverde, M. (2006). Governmentality. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2(1), 83–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, G. C. (2017). Neoliberalism, education and curriculum. In B. Gobby & R. Walker (Eds.), Powers of curriculum: Sociological perspectives on education (pp. 143–165). Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, G. B., & Griggs, C. B. (2015). Standardization and subjection: An autonomist critique of neoliberal school reform. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 37(5), 438–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smolović Jones, S., Smolović Jones, O., Winchester, N., & Grint, K. (2016). Putting the discourse to work: On outlining a praxis of democratic leadership development. Management Learning, 47(4), 424–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Springer, S. (2012). Neoliberalism as discourse: Between Foucauldian political economy and Marxian poststructuralism. Critical Discourse Studies, 9(2), 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svedberg, L. (2004). Rhetorical resources for management: The leading words. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 32(4), 423–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theoharis, G. (2007). Social justice educational leaders and resistance: Toward a theory of social justice leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(2), 221–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, P. (2008). Headteacher critique and resistance: A challenge for policy, and for leadership/management scholars. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 40(2), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620802210848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrupp, M., & Willmott, R. (2003). Educational management in managerialist times. Maidenhead, UK: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, P. T., Gulson, K., & Pitton, V. (2014). The neo-liberal education policies of epimeleia heautou: Caring for the self in school markets. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(1), 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenman, M. (2013). Agonistic democracy: Constituent power in the era of globalisation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wingard, J. (2017). Branding Citizens: The logic (s) of a few bad apples. In K. H. Nguyen (Ed.), Rhetoric in neoliberalism (pp. 135–155). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, A. (2012). Fantasies of empowerment: Mapping neoliberal discourse in the coalition government’s schools policy. Journal of Education Policy, 27(3), 279–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ylimaki, R. M. (2012). Curriculum leadership in a conservative era. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(2), 304–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Dolan .

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Dolan, C. (2021). The Worldwide Specter of Neoliberalism and the “Neoliberalization” of Educational Leaders. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Educational Leadership and Management Discourse. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39666-4_3-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39666-4_3-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39666-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-39666-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics