Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Consuming Images, Ethics, and Integrity in Visual Social Research

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity

Abstract

The use of images in social research can be traced to the mid-twentieth-century sociological inquiry of John Collier and Pierre Bourdieu and the anthropological film and photography of Margaret Mead and Gregory Bateson who sought to understand culture by making it visible. More recently, rapid developments in digital technology have extended the range of visual methodologies and the diversity of visual material available for research. Contemporary visual methods encompassing participatory video, collaborative cellphilms, photo-voice, and photo-elicitation reflect an increasingly dynamic digital visual culture and offer new possibilities for researchers to illuminate social issues. However, alongside the potential of these, new visual methods and technologies have arisen a number of ethical challenges. Rapid transformations in the ways in which images are produced, communicated, and consumed within a new digital visual and media landscape have outpaced developments in research governance and codes of practice. Moreover, the democratization of research in which research participants share in the production of research troubles traditional research hierarchies and decision-making about what gets seen and shared while the potential of digitized images to circulate beyond the immediate temporal and spatial confines of research calls into question the appropriateness of formalized ethical frameworks based on principles of anonymity and confidentiality.

This chapter sets out an alternative approach based on a feminist ethics of care, which seeks to know well and know responsibly. This relational approach marks a departure from ethical decision-making founded on absolutist principles which may undermine participants moral rights such as the right to be acknowledged in research. In considering ethical decision-making as a form of responsible knowing, care-based ethics foregrounds the contextual, emergent nature of ethical decision-making in which the potential harms and benefits are considered within the context of each unique research relationship framed by an understanding of the wider social and political landscape. Examples from contemporary research are drawn upon to illustrate how researchers might navigate the specific challenges engendered by visual research in which the boundaries, for example, about what could and should be revealed in the generation and dissemination of research, are being rapidly redrawn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Back L (2009) Portrayal and betrayal: Bourdieu, photography and sociological life. Sociol Rev 57(3):471–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks M, Zeitlyn D (2015) Visual methods in social research, 2nd edn. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer D, Burrows R (2013) Popular culture, digital archives and the new social life of data. Theory Cult Soc 30(4):47–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1990 [1965]) Photography: a middle-brow art. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd D, Marwick A (2011) Social privacy in networked publics: teens’ attitudes, practices, and strategies. Proceedings of a decade in Internet time, OII Symposium on the dynamics of the Internet and society, University of Oxford, 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady G, Brown G (2013) Rewarding but let’s talk about the challenges: using arts-based methods in research with young mothers. Methodol Innov Online 8(1):99–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • British Educational Research Association [BERA] (2018) Ethical guidelines for educational research, fourth edition, London. https://www.bera.ac.uk/researchers-resources/publications/ethicalguidelines-for-educational-research-2018. Accessed 30 Oct 2019

  • British Sociological Research Association (2017) Statement of Ethical Practice https://www.britsoc.co.uk/media/24310/bsa_statement_of_ethical_practice.pdf

  • Collier J (1957) Photography in anthropology: a report on two experiments. Am Anthropol 59(5):843–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies K (2008) Photo elicitation and informed consent: reflections from the Living Resemblances project. In: Wiles R, Prosser J, Bagnoli A, Clark A, Davies K, Holland S, Renold E (eds) Visual ethics: ethical issues in visual research, ESRC National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper, Southampton, National Centre for Research Methods. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/421/1/MethodsReviewPaperNCRM-011.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2019

  • Durham MG (2018) Resignifying Alan Kurdi: news photographs, memes, and the ethics of embodied vulnerability. Crit Stud Media Commun 35(3):240–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2017.1408958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards V (2019) How might we work more ethically with children and young people: the ‘case of ethics’. Accessed 30 Oct 2019

    Google Scholar 

  • Escott H, Pahl K (2019) ‘Being in the bin’: affective understandings of prescriptivism and spelling in video narratives co-produced with children in a post-industrial area of the UK. Linguist Educ 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.100754

  • Fink J (2012) Walking the neighbourhood, seeing the small details of community life: reflections from a photography walking tour. Crit Soc Policy 32(1):31–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink J, Lomax H (2016) Sharing images, spoiling meanings? Class, gender & ethics in visual research with girls. Girlhood Stud 9(3):20–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabb J (2010) Home truths: ethical issues in family research. Qual Res 10:461–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillemin M, Gillam L (2004) Ethics, reflexivity, and ‘ethically important moments’ in research. Qual Inq 10(2):261–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haaken J, O’Neill M (2014) Moving images: psychoanalytically-informed visual methods in documenting the lives of women migrants and asylum-seekers. J Health Psychol 19(1):79–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall M, Pahl K, Pool S (2015) Visual digital methodologies with children and young people: perspectives from the field. In: Stirling E, Yamada-Rice D (eds) Visual methods with children and young people. Palgrave, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Hand M (2017) Visuality in social media: researching images, circulations and practices images. In: Sloan L, Quan-Haase A (eds) The SAGE handbook of social media research methods. Sage, London, pp 215–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Heng T (2017) Visual methods in the field: photograph for the social sciences. Routledge, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Henwood K, Dicks B, Housley W (2019) QR in reflexive mode: the participatory turn and interpretive social science. Qual Res 19(3):241–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Iphofen R (2011) Ethical decision making in qualitative research. Qual Res 11(4):443–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen J, Sandbye M (eds) (2014) Digital snaps: the new face of photography. IB Tauris, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Leurs K (2017) Feminist data studies: using digital methods for ethical, reflexive and situated socio-cultural research. Fem Rev 115:130–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lie R, Witteveen L (2017) Visual informed consent: informed consent without forms. Int J Soc Res Methodol 20(1):63–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomax H (2012) Shifting the focus: Children’s image making practices & their implications for analysis. Int J Res Method Educ 35(2):227–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomax H (2015) Seen & heard? Ethics & agency in participatory visual research with children, young people & families. Fam Relatsh Soc 4(3):493–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomax H, Fink J (2019) Understanding online images: content, Context & Circulation as analytic foci. In: Pauwels L, Mannay D (eds) Sage handbook of visual methods, 2nd edn. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomax H, Fink J, Singh N, High C (2011) The politics of performance: methodological challenges of researching children’s experiences of childhood through the lens of participatory video. Int J Soc Res Methodol 14(3):231–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luttrell W, Restler V, Fontaine C (2012) Youth video-making: selves and identities in dialogue. In: Milne EJ, Mitchell C, de Lange N (eds) Participatory video handbook. AltaMira Press, Latham, pp 164–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandrona A (2016) Visual culture, aesthetics and the ethics of cellphilming. In: MacEntee K, Burkholder C, Schwab-Cartas J (eds) What’s a Cellphilm? Integrating Mobile phone technology into participatory visual research and activism. Sense publishers, Rotterdam, pp 183–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannay D (2010) Making the familiar strange: can visual research methods render the familiar setting more perceptible? Qual Res 10(1):91–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannay D (2013) ‘Who put that on there … why why why?’ Power games and participatory techniques of visual data production. Vis Stud 28(2):136–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannay D (2016) Visual, narrative and creative research methods: application, reflection and ethics. Routledge, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannay D, Staples E (2019) Sandboxes, stickers and superheroes: employing creative techniques to explore the aspirations and experiences of children and young people who are looked after. In: Mannay D, Rees A, Roberts L (eds) Children and young people ‘looked after’? Education, intervention and the everyday culture of care in Wales. University of Wales Press, Cardiff, pp 169–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannay D, Lomax H, Fink J (2015) Scissors, sand and the cutting room floor: employing visual and creative methods ethically with marginalised communities. Paper presented at the British Sociological Association Annual Conference, Glasgow, 15–17 April 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Markham A (2012) Fabrication as ethical practice: qualitative inquiry in ambiguous internet contexts. Inf Commun Soc 15(3):334–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh JA (2017) The internet of toys: a posthuman and multimodal analysis of connected play. Teach Coll Rec 119:120305. ISSN 0161-4681

    Google Scholar 

  • Mielczarek N (2018) The dead Syrian refugee boy goes viral: funerary Aylan Kurdi memes as tools of mourning and visual reparation in remix culture. Vis Commun. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357218797366

  • Miller T, Birch M, Mauthner M, Jessop J (2012) Ethics in qualitative research. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills CW (1957) The sociological imagination. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell C (2017) “The girl should just clean up the mess”: on studying audiences in understanding the meaningful engagement of young people in policy-making. Int J Qual Methods 16:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mok TM, Cornish F, Tarr J (2015) Too Much Information: Visual Research Ethics in the Age of Wearable Cameras, Integr Psych Behav 49:309–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-014-9289-8

  • Nutbrown C (2010) Naked by the Pool? Blurring the image? Ethical issues in the portrayal of young children in arts-based educational research. Qual Inq 17(1):3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor D (2013) The apomediated world: regulating research when social media has changed research. J Law Med Ethics 41(2):470–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill M, Roberts B (2020) Walking methods: research on the move. Routledge, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauwels L (2011) An integrated conceptual framework for visual social research. In: Margolis E, Pauwels L (eds) The Sage handbook of visual research methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 3–23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pilcher K, Martin W, Williams V (2016) Issues of collaboration, representation, meaning and emotions: utilising participant-led visual diaries to capture the everyday lives of people in mid to later life. Int J Soc Res Methodol 19(6):677–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pink S (2013) Doing visual ethnography. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser J, Loxley A (2008) Introducing Visual Methods. Discussion Paper. National Centre for Research Methods http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/420/. Accessed 30 Oct 19

  • Rose G (2016) Visual methodologies: an introduction to researching with visual materials, 4th edn. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Casares M, Thompson J (2016) Obtaining meaningful informed consent: preliminary results of a study to develop visual informed consent forms with children. Chil Geograph 14(1):35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders B, Kitzinger J, Kitzinger C (2015) Participant Anonymity in the Internet Age: From Theory to Practice. Qualitative Research in Psychology 12(2):125–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultheis F, Bourdieu P (2001) Pictures from Algeria: an interview with Pierre Bourdieu. Camera Austria, Graz

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontag S (2014) Regarding the pain of others. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirling E, Yamada-Rice D (2015) Visual methods with children and young people. Palgrave, Basingstoke

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sweetman P (2009) Just anybody? Images, ethics and recognition. In: Gillett J (ed) Just anybody. Fotonet/The Winchester Gallery, Winchester, pp 7–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Trachtenberg A (1989) Reading American photographs: images as history-Mathew Brady to Walker Evans. Hill and Wang, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto J (1993) Moral boundaries: a political argument for an ethic of care. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijck J (2008) Digital photography: communication, identity, Memory. Vis Commun 71(1):57–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van House NA (2011) Personal photography, digital technologies and the uses of the visual. Vis Stud 26(2):125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vannini P, Stewart LM (2017) The GoPro gaze. Cult Geogr 24(1):149–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson C, Barnabas S, Tomaselli K (2016) Smaller lens, bigger picture: exploring self-generated cellphilms in participatory research. In: MacEntee K, Burkholder C, Schwab-Cartas J (eds) What’s a cellphilm? Integrating mobile phone technology into participatory visual research and activism. Sense publishers, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiles R, Prosser J, Bagnoli A, Clark A, Davies K, Holland S, Renold E (2008) Visual ethics: ethical issues in visual research, ESRC National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper, Southampton, National Centre for Research Methods. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/421/1/MethodsReviewPaperNCRM-011.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 19

  • Wiles R, Coffey A, Robinson J, Heath S (2012) Anonymisation and visual images: issues of respect, ‘voice’ and protection. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 15(1):41–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams M, Burnapp P, Sloan L (2017) Towards an Ethical Framework for Publishing Twitter Data in Social Research: Taking into Account Users’ Views, Online Context and Algorithmic Estimation. Sociology 51(6):1149–1168

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood E (2015) Ethics, voices and visual methods. In: Stirling E, Yamada-Rice D (eds) Visual methods with children and young people. Palgrave, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang KH (2015) Voice, authenticity and ethical challenges: the participatory dissemination of youth-generated visual data over social media. Vis Stud 30(3):309–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education and Professional Development, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, England

    Helen Lomax

Authors
  1. Helen Lomax
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helen Lomax .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Chatelaillon Plage, France

    Ron Iphofen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Lomax, H. (2020). Consuming Images, Ethics, and Integrity in Visual Social Research. In: Iphofen, R. (eds) Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16759-2_39

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation