The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Interest Groups, Lobbying and Public Affairs

Living Edition
| Editors: Phil Harris, Alberto Bitonti, Craig S. Fleisher, Anne Skorkjær Binderkrantz

Democratic Innovation

  • Michele SoriceEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13895-0_66-1
  • 19 Downloads

Definition

The term democratic innovation covers all procedures aimed at facilitating and increasing citizens’ access and political participation, which are realized both through institutions specifically designed to increase public participation and through bottom-up experiences capable of providing connections to institutional practices in policy-making and political decision-making processes.

A modern definition of democratic innovation should be inclusive and sufficiently flexible to consider both the forms of institutional reshaping promoted by public institutions themselves and the cases of democratic participation promoted by citizens’ associations and/or social movements that only subsequently – and usually through articulated forms of conflict and bargaining – undergo an institutionalization process.

Introduction

The concept of democratic innovation entered the international political and academic debate at the beginning of the twenty-first century, although in the seventies...

Keywords

Political participation Policymaking Mini-publics Crisis of representation Participatory budget 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Albert, V. (2016). The limits to citizen power. Participatory democracy and the entanglements of the state. London: Pluto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baiocchi, G., & Ganuza, E. (2018). Popular democracy. The paradox of participation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society. Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. De Blasio, E., & Sorice, M. (2019). E-democracy and digital activism: From divergent paths toward a new frame. International Journal of Communication, 13, 5715–5733.Google Scholar
  5. Fawcett, P., Flinders, M., Hay, C., & Wood, M. (Eds.). (2017). Anti-politics, depoliticisation, & governance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Floridia, A. (2017). From participation to deliberation: A critical genealogy of deliberative democracy. London: ECPR Press/Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  7. Geissel, B., & Joas, M. (Eds.). (2013). Participatory democratic innovations in Europe: Improving the quality of democracy? Berlin, Germany: Barbara Budrich.Google Scholar
  8. Godin, R. E. (2008). Innovating democracy. Democratic theory and practice after the deliberative turn. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Saward, M. (Ed.). (2000). Democratic innovation. Deliberation, representation and association. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Sintomer, Y. (2010). Random selection, republican self-government, and deliberative democracy. Constellations, 17, 472–487.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.2010.00607.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Smith, G. (2009). Democratic innovations: Designing institutions for citizen participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2017). Depoliticizing or repoliticizing public governance? In P. Fawcett, M. Flinders, C. Hay, & M. Wood (Eds.), Anti-politics, depoliticisation, & governance (pp. 28–48). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Urbinati, N. (2014). Democracy disfigured: Opinion, truth and the people. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Elstub, S., & Escobar, O. (Eds.). (2019). Handbook of democratic innovation and governance. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Elstub, S., & McLaverty, P. (2014). Deliberative democracy: Issues and cases. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Geissel, B., & Newton, K. (Eds.). (2012). Evaluating democratic innovations. Curing the democratic malaise? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Smith, G. (2009). Democratic innovations: Designing institutions for citizen participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political SciencesLuiss UniversityRomeItaly

Section editors and affiliations

  • Alberto Bitonti
    • 1
  1. 1.Università della Svizzera ItalianaLuganoSwitzerland