Interests Groups Framing

  • Iskander De BruyckerEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13895-0_41-1

Definition

This chapter sets out to introduce the interest group literature on framing. Framing is typically understood as a process where actors emphasize certain aspects of an issue over others to designate what is important and what should be paid attention to. Framing is often seen as a cumbersome research topic but can easily be tackled when the appropriate definitions, framing types, and levels of analyses are considered. Previous studies have made great progress in explaining how frames are selected and how they impact decision-making. The chapter discusses relevant studies, identifies challenges ahead, and highlights pathways for future research. It concludes by explaining how interest group frames are part of a larger chorus of frames to which different kinds of political actors contribute. In order to understand frame selection and impact, we need to take stock of the broader chorus in which interest group frames are embedded.

Introduction

The definition of the alternatives...

Keywords

Interest groups Framing Strategy Influence 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Baumgartner, F. R., De Boef, S. L., & Boydstun, A. E. (2008). The decline of the death penalty and the discovery of innocence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumgartner, F. R., & Mahoney, C. (2008). Forum section: The two faces of framing: Individual-level framing and collective issue definition in the European Union. European Union Politics, 9(3), 435–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 611–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Binderkrantz, A. S. (2019). Interest group framing in Denmark and the UK: Membership representation or public appeal? Journal of European Public Policy, 1–21. (available online)Google Scholar
  5. Candel, J. J., Breeman, G. E., Stiller, S. J., & Termeer, C. J. (2014). Disentangling the consensus frame of food security: The case of the EU common agricultural policy reform debate. Food Policy, 44, 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Daviter, F. (2011). Policy framing in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. De Bruycker, I. (2016). Pressure and expertise: Explaining the information supply of interest groups in EU legislative lobbying. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(3), 599–616.Google Scholar
  9. De Bruycker, I. (2019). Blessing or curse for advocacy? How news media attention helps advocacy groups to achieve their policy goals. Political Communication, 36(1), 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Vreese, C. H. (2005). News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journal & Document Design, 13(1), 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dür, A. (2019). How interest groups influence public opinion: Arguments matter more than the sources. European Journal of Political Research, 58(2), 514–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eising, R., Rasch, D., & Rozbicka, P. (2015). Institutions, policies, and arguments: Context and strategy in EU policy framing. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(4), 516–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Junk, W. M., & Rasmussen, A. (2019). Framing by the flock: Collective issue definition and advocacy success. Comparative Political Studies, 52(4), 483–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Klüver, H., & Mahoney, C. (2015). Measuring interest group framing strategies in public policy debates. Journal of Public Policy, 35(2), 223–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Klüver, H., Mahoney, C., & Opper, M. (2015). Framing in context: How interest groups employ framing to lobby the European Commission. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(4), 481–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McLeod, D. M., & Shah, D. V. (2015). News frames and national security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semi-sovereign people: A Realist’s view of democracy in America. Hinsdale, IL: The Dryden Press.Google Scholar
  19. Scheufele, D. A., & Iyengar, S. (2012). The state of framing research: A call for new directions. The Oxford handbook of political communication theories (pp. 1–26). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Voltolini, B., & Eising, R. (2017). Framing processes and lobbying in EU foreign policy: Case study and process-tracing methods. European Political Science, 16, 354–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Baumgartner, F. R., & Mahoney, C. (2008). Forum section: The two faces of framing: Individual-level framing and collective issue definition in the European Union. European Union Politics, 9(3), 435–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. De Bruycker, I. (2017). Framing and advocacy: A research agenda for interest group studies. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(5), 775–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Maastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands