Security Sector Reform After Armed Conflict

  • Sabine KurtenbachEmail author
  • Nadine Ansorg
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11795-5_3-1

Synonyms

Definition/Description

Security sector reform (SSR) is a central pillar of peace strategies, closely linked to but not interchangeable with state-building and democratization. There is a broad consensus that sustainable post-war peace needs a stable security environment and thus institutions that are able to inhibit non-legal manifestations of violence. The main elements of SSR are reforms in the state security institutions (military and police) as well as in the judiciary. The first generation SSR was characterized by Western blueprints and a lack of context sensitivity, with the empirical record being rather weak. As a consequence, programs moved away from “one size fits all” to a greater attention to local contexts. The need to include local, non-state actors has been acknowledged, but designing and implementing new approaches on the ground is neither easy nor going to happen in the immediate future. A further step in the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Almohamad, S. (2019). Bringing regional politics to the study of security sector reform: Army reform in Sierra Leone and Iraq. GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg.Google Scholar
  2. Ansorg, N. (2019). Decolonising security sector reform in fragile countries in the global south. Keynote address at the workshop “Security sector reform in fragile contexts – What works best, where and when?,” Federal Academy for Security Policy and GIZ, Berlin.Google Scholar
  3. Ansorg, N., & Gordon, E. (2019). Co-operation, contestation and complexity in post-conflict security sector reform. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 13(1), 2–24.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2018.1516392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ansorg, N., & Haastrup, T. (2018). Gender and the EU’s support for security sector reform in fragile contexts: Gender & the EU’s support to SSR. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12716.Google Scholar
  5. Ansorg, N., & Kurtenbach, S. (2017). Introduction: Institutional reforms and peace building. In N. Ansorg & S. Kurtenbach (Eds.), Institutional reforms and peacebuilding. Change, path-dependency and societal divisions in post-war communities (pp. 1–18). Abingdon/Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Ansorg, N., Haass, F., & Strasheim, J. (2016). Police reforms in peace agreements, 1975–2011: Introducing the PRPA dataset. Journal of Peace Research, 53(4), 597–607.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343316628932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arjona, A. (2014). Wartime institutions: A research agenda. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 58(8), 1360–1389.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002714547904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bajraktari, Y., Boutellis, A., Gunja, F., Harris, D. Y., Kapsis, J., Kaye, E., & Rhee, J. (2006). The PRIME system: Measuring the success of post-conflict police reform. Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton NJ.Google Scholar
  9. Ball, N. (2006). Civil society, good governance and the security sector. In M. Caparini, P. Fluri, & F. Molnar (Eds.), Civil society and the security sector. Concepts and practices in new democracies. Berlin: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
  10. Berg, L.-A. (2014). From weakness to strength: The political roots of security sector reform in Bosnia and Herzegovina. International Peacekeeping, 21(2), 149–164.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2014.910397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bernabéu, I. (2007). Laying the foundations of democracy? Reconsidering security sector reform under UN auspices in Kosovo. Security Dialogue, 38(1), 71–92.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010607075973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Besley, T., & Persson, T. (2010). State capacity, conflict, and development. Econometrica, 78(1), 1–34.  https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA8073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Betts, W. S., Carlson, S. N., & Gisvold, G. (2001). Post-conflict transitional administration of Kosovo and the lessons-learned in efforts to establish a judiciary and rule of law. Michigan Journal of International Law, 22(3), 371.Google Scholar
  14. Bøås, M., & Stig, K. (2010). Security sector reform in Liberia: An uneven partnership without local ownership. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 4(3), 285–303.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2010.498934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Boege, V. (2016). Looking beyond institutional reform engaging with the hybridization of peace and political order. Two cases from Oceania and West Africa. In N. Ansorg, S. Kurtenbach, & H. Wulf (Eds.), Institutional reforms and peacebuilding: Change, path-dependency and societal divisions in post-war communities (1st ed.). New York: Routledge.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315545219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bryden, A., & Hänggi, H. (2004). Reform and reconstruction of the security sector. Münster: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
  17. Brzoska, M., & Heinemann-Grüder, A. (2004). Security sector reform and post-conflict reconstruction under international auspices. In A. Bryden & H. Hänggi (Eds.), Reform and reconstruction of the security sector (pp. 121–142). Münster: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
  18. Capoccia, G. (2016). When do institutions “bite”? Historical institutionalism and the politics of institutional change. Comparative Political Studies, 49(8), 1095–1127.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414015626449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cawthra, G., & Luckham, R. (2003). Governing insecurity: Democratic control of military and security establishments in transitional democracies. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  20. Chanaa, J. (2002). Security sector reform: Issues, challenges and prospects. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press for the International Institute for Strategic Studies.Google Scholar
  21. Cooper, N., & Pugh, M. (2002). Security-sector transformation in post-conflict societies (The Conflict, Security & Development Group working papers). Retrieved from Centre for Defence Studies, King’s College London website: http://securityanddevelopment.org/pdf/work5.pdf
  22. Davis, D. E. (2009). Non-state armed actors, new imagined communities, and shifting patterns of sovereignty and insecurity in the modern world. Contemporary Security Policy, 30, 221–245.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260903059757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Donais, T. (2009). Empowerment or imposition? Dilemmas of local ownership in post-conflict peacebuilding processes. Peace & Change, 34(1), 3–26.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0130.2009.00531.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Doyle, M. W., & Sambanis, N. (2000). International peacebuilding: A theoretical and quantitative analysis. The American Political Science Review, 94(4), 779–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Giustozzi, A. (2011). The art of coercion: The primitive accumulation and management of coercive power. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Giustozzi, A. (Ed.). (2012). Post-conflict disarmament, demobilization and reintegration: Bringing state-building back in. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  27. Glassmyer, K., & Sambanis, N. (2008). Rebel – Military integration and civil war termination. Journal of Peace Research, 45(3), 365–384.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343308088816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gross, E. (2009). Security sector reform in Afghanistan: The EU’s contribution. Brussels: European Union Institute for Security Studies.Google Scholar
  29. Hartzell, C., & Hoddie, M. (2003). Institutionalizing peace: Power sharing and post-civil war conflict management. American Journal of Political Science, 47(2), 318–332.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5907.00022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hood, L. (2006). Missed opportunities: The United Nations, police service and defence force development in Timor-Leste, 1999–2004. Civil Wars, 8(2), 143–162.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13698240600877270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jackson, P. (2011). Security sector reform and state building. Third World Quarterly, 32(10), 1803–1822.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2011.610577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jackson, P. (2018). Introduction: Second-generation security sector reform. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 12(1), 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2018.1426384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Joshi, M., Quinn, J. M., & Regan, P. M. (2015). Annualized implementation data on comprehensive intrastate peace accords, 1989–2012. Journal of Peace Research, 52(4), 551–562.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343314567486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Keen, D. (2000). War and peace: What’s the difference? International Peacekeeping, 7(4), 1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13533310008413860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Krause, K. (2012). Hybrid violence: Locating the use of force in postconflict settings. Global Governance, 18(1), 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kuehn, D., & Lorenz, P. (2011). Explaining civil-military relations in new democracies: Structure, agency and theory development. Asian Journal of Political Science, 19(3), 231–249.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2011.628145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kurtenbach, S. (2008). Guatemala’s post-war development. The structural failure of low intensity peace (Working paper no. 3, Social and political fractures after wars: Youth violence in Cambodia and Guatemala). Duisburg: INEF.Google Scholar
  38. Kurtenbach, S. (2010). Why is liberal peace-building so difficult? Some lessons from Central America. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 88, 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kurtenbach, S. (2013). The ‘happy outcomes’ may not come at all – Postwar violence in Central America. Civil Wars, 15(Suppl 1), 105–122.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2013.850884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kurtenbach, S., & Wulf, H. (2012). Violence and security concerns in post-conflict situations (Research and advisory project „Instruments and procedures of German development cooperation in post-conflict situations“ – Project working paper no. 3). Duisburg: Institute for Development and Peace.Google Scholar
  41. Lambach, D. (2007). Oligopolies of violence in post-conflict societies. Hamburg: German Institute of Global and Area Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lemay-Hébert, N. (2014). Resistance in the time of cholera: The limits of stabilization through securitization in Haiti. International Peacekeeping, 21(2), 198–213.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2014.910399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Licklider, R. (2014). New armies from old: Merging competing military forces after civil wars. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Loden, A. (2007). Civil society and security sector reform in post-conflict Liberia: Painting a moving train without brushes. The International Journal of Transitional Justice, 1(2), 297–307.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijm022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mac Ginty, R. (2011). International peacebuilding and local resistance: Hybrid forms of peace. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mac Ginty, R., & Richmond, O. P. (2013). The local turn in peace building: A critical agenda for peace. Third World Quarterly, 34(5), 763–783.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2013.800750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McFate, S. (2010). The link between DDR and SSR in conflict-affected countries. Retrieved from United States Institute of Peace website: https://www.usip.org/publications/2010/05/link-between-ddr-and-ssr-conflict-affected-countries
  48. Mehler, A. (2009). Hybrid regimes and oligopolies of violence in Africa: Expectations on security provision “from below” (No. 8). Retrieved from Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management website: http://www.berghof-foundation.org/fileadmin/redaktion/Publications/Handbook/Dialogue_Chapters/dialogue8_mehler_comm.pdf
  49. Mendelson-Forman, J. (2006). Security sector reform in Haiti. International Peacekeeping, 13(1), 14–27.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13533310500424629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Muggah, R. (2005). No magic bullet: A critical perspective on disarmament, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) and weapons reduction in post-conflict contexts. The Round Table, 94(379), 239–252.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00358530500082684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Myrttinen, H. (2010). Poster boys no more: Gender and security sector reform in Timor-Leste (Report). Geneva: Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF).Google Scholar
  52. Nathan, L. (2007). No ownership, no commitment: A guide to local ownership of security sector reform. Retrieved from http://issat.dcaf.ch/mkd/layout/set/fullscreen/content/download/2210/19148/file/Nathan%20No_Ownership_No_Commitment.pdf
  53. Neild, R. (2001). Democratic police reforms in war-torn societies. Conflict, Security and Development, 1(01), 21–43.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14678800100590596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. O’Neill, W. G. (2005). Police reform in post-conflict societies: What we know and what we still need to know. Retrieved from International Peace Academy website: http://www.ipinst.org/~ipinst/media/pdf/publications/polreferpt.pdf
  55. OECD. (2007). OECD DAC handbook on security system reform. Supporting security and justice. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  56. Paris, R., & Sisk, T. D. (Eds.). (2009). The dilemmas of statebuilding: Confronting the contradictions of postwar peace operations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Schroeder, U. C., Chappuis, F., & Kocak, D. (2014). Security sector reform and the emergence of hybrid security governance. International Peacekeeping, 21(2), 214–230.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2014.910405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sedra, M. (2010). Security sector reform 101: Understanding the concept, charting trends and identifying challenges. Retrieved from The Centre for International Governance Innovation website: https://www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/ssr_101_final_april_27.pdf
  59. Sedra, M. (2014). An uncertain future for Afghanistan’s security sector. Stability: International Journal of Security & Development, 3(1), 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.5334/sta.ei.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sedra, M. (2018). Adapting security sector reform to ground-level realities: The transition to a second-generation model. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 12(1), 48–63.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2018.1426383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Slaby, K. (2003). Security sector reform in Central America: Is it working? (No. IPS 688-FA03). Retrieved from Monterey Institute of International Studies website: http://sites.miis.edu/sand/files/2011/07/Security-Sector-Reform-in-Central-America-is-it-Working-Kimberly-Slaby.pdf
  62. Spear, J. (2002). Disarmament and demobilization. In S. J. Stedman, D. Rothchild, & E. M. Cousens (Eds.), Ending civil wars. The implementation of peace agreements (pp. 141–182). Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  63. Stodiek, T., & Zellner, W. (2007). The creation of multi-ethnic police services in the Western Balkans: A record of mixed success. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-260323
  64. Strohmeyer, H. (2001). Collapse and reconstruction of a judicial system: The United Nations Missions in Kosovo and East Timor. The American Journal of International Law, 95(1), 46–63.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2642036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. UN. (2014). Resolution 2151 (2014) (UN Security Council Resolution). Retrieved from United Nation Security Council website: http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/2151(2014)
  66. Vetschera, H., & Damian, M. (2006). Security sector reform in Bosnia and Herzegovina: The role of the international community. International Peacekeeping, 13(1), 28–42.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13533310500424694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Waldman, T. (2014). The use of statebuilding research in fragile contexts: Evidence from British policymaking in Afghanistan, Nepal and Sierra Leone. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 8(2–3), 149–172.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2014.885675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wood, E. J. (2008). The social processes of civil war: The wartime transformation of social networks. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 539–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wulf, H. (2004). Security sector reform in developing and transitional countries. Berlin: Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GIGA German Institute of Global and Area StudiesHamburgGermany
  2. 2.University of KentCanterburyUK

Section editors and affiliations

  • Kai Michael Kenkel
  • Oliver Richmond
    • 1
  • Gëzim Visoka
    • 2
  1. 1.The University of ManchesterManchesterUK
  2. 2.Dublin City UniversityDublinIreland