Perpetrator Research

  • Timothy WilliamsEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11795-5_22-1

Definition

Perpetrator research has become an important sub-discipline of peace and conflict studies. It challenges researchers to try and understand conflict and violence not only from the less contentious perspectives of the victims or the analytically less entangled perspective of bystanders or outsiders but also from the viewpoint of those who planned and enacted the violence. Recent research on perpetrators has shifted its focus down the hierarchy to increasingly studying low-level perpetrators, engaging with these men and women across various different cases in order to try to understand their motivations for perpetration. Furthermore, perpetrator research focuses on perpetrators in post-violence societies, studying how they reintegrate into society, how transitional justice mechanisms deal with them, as well as how their actions are remembered societally and constructed in cultural representations of them. As such, perpetrator research attempts to untangle the various actions...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Anderson, K. (2017). Perpetrating genocide. A criminological account. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, M. E. (2018). Perpetrator trauma, empathic unsettlement, and the uncanny: Conceptualizations of perpetrators in South Africa’s truth commission special report. Journal of Perpetrator Research, 2(1), 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baines, E. (2009). Complex Political Perpetrators. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 47(2), 163–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernath, J. (2016). ‘Complex political victims’ in the aftermath of mass atrocity. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 10(1), 46–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, S. E. (2017). Gender and the genocide in Rwanda. Women as rescuers and perpetrators. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Browning, C. (2001). Ordinary men. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  7. Drumbl, M. (2012). Reimagining child soldiers in international law and policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eggert, J. (2018). Female fighters and militants during the lebanese civil war: Individual profiles, pathways and motivations. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 1–30.Google Scholar
  9. Fujii, L. A. (2009). Killing neighbours: Networks of violence in Rwanda. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Goldhagen, D. J. (1996). Hitler’s willing executioners. London: Abacus.Google Scholar
  11. Gross, J. T. (2003). Neighbours. London: Arrow.Google Scholar
  12. Gudehus, C. (2018). Violence as action. In Perpetrators and perpetration of mass violence. Dynamics, motivations and concepts (pp. 36–57). Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heschel, S. (2004). Does atrocity have a gender? Feminist interpretations of women in the SS. In J. M. Diefendorf (Ed.), Lessons and legacies VI: New currents in holocaust research (pp. 300–321). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jeftic, A. (2019). Social aspects of memory. Stories of victims and perpetrators from Bosnia-Herzegovina. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jessee, E. (2015). Introduction. Approaching Perpetrators. Conflict and Society, 1(1), 4–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jessee, E. (2017). Negotiating genocide in Rwanda. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kellenbach, K. (2013). The mark of Cain. Guilt and denial in the post-war lives of Nazi perpetrators. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Knittel, S. (2014). The historical uncanny: Disability, ethnicity, and the politics of holocaust memory. New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kühl, S. (2014). Ganz normale Organisationen. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  20. Leader Maynard, J. (2014). Rethinking the role of ideology in mass atrocities. Terrorism and Political Violence, 26(5), 821–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Littell, J. (2009). The kindly ones. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  22. Manning, P. (2015). Reconciliation and perpetrator memories in Cambodia. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 9(3), 386–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McDoom, O. (2013). Who killed in Rwanda’s genocide? Journal of Peace Research, 50(4), 453–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McGlothlin, E. (2016). Empathetic identification and the mind of the holocaust perpetrator in fiction: A proposed taxonomy of response. Narrative, 24(3), 251–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Morag, R. (2013). Waltzing with Bashir: Perpetrator trauma and cinema. London: I.B. Tauris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rau, P. (2013). Our Nazis: Representations of fascism in contemporary literature and film.  https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748668649.001.0001.
  27. Rauschenbach, M., Staerklé, C., & Scalia, D. (2016). Accused for involvement in collective violence: The discursive reconstruction of agency and identity by perpetrators of international crimes. Political Psychology, 37(2), 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Renner, J. (2015). Producing the subjects of reconciliation: The making of sierra Leoneans as victims and perpetrators of past human rights violations. Third World Quarterly, 36(6), 1110–1128.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1047197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sandberg, E. (2014). ‘This incomprehensible thing’: Jonathan Littell’s the kindly ones and the aesthetics of excess. Cambridge Quarterly, 43(3), 231–255.  https://doi.org/10.1093/camqtly/bfu015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schmidt, S. (2017). Perpetrator’s knowledge: What and how can we learn from perpetrator testimony? Journal of Perpetrator Research, 1(1), 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sjoberg, L. (2016). Women as wartime rapists. Beyond sensation and stereotyping. New York: NYU Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sjoberg, L., & Gentry, C. E. (2007). Mothers, monsters, whores: Women’s violence in global politics. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  33. Skjelsbæk, I. (2018). Perpetrators of sexual violence in armed conflict. In T. Williams & S. Buckley-Zistel (Eds.), Perpetrators and perpetration of mass violence. Dynamics, motivations and concepts (pp. 151–168). Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smeulers, A., Weerdesteijn, M., & Holá, B. (Eds.). (2019). Perpetrators of international crimes theories, methods, and evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Straus, S. (2006). The order of genocide. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Tames, I. (2016). Ashamed about the past: The case of Nazi collaborators and their families in post-war Dutch society. In S. Bird, M. Fulbrook, J. Wagner, & C. Wienand (Eds.), Reverberations of Nazi violence in Germany and beyond: Disturbing pasts (pp. 47–64). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  37. Waller, J. (2002). Becoming evil: How ordinary people commit genocide and mass killing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Williams, T. (2018). Agency, responsibility, and culpability: The complexity of roles and self-representations of perpetrators. Journal of Perpetrator Research, 2(1), 39–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Williams, T. (forthcoming). The complexity of evil. Modelling perpetration in genocide. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Williams, T., & Buckley-Zistel, S. (2018). Perpetrators and perpetration of mass violence. Dynamics, motivations and concepts. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceBundeswehr University MunichMunichGermany

Section editors and affiliations

  • Johanna Mannergren Selimovic
    • 1
  • Oliver Richmond
    • 2
  • Gëzim Visoka
    • 3
  1. 1.The Swedish Institute of International AffairsStockholmSweden
  2. 2.The University of ManchesterManchesterUK
  3. 3.Dublin City UniversityDublinIreland