Advertisement

Evaluation and Decision Making in Higher Education

Toward Equitable Repertoires of Faculty Practice
  • Julie PosseltEmail author
  • Theresa E. Hernandez
  • Cynthia D. Villarreal
  • Aireale J. Rodgers
  • Lauren N. Irwin
Living reference work entry
  • 2 Downloads
Part of the Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research book series (HATR, volume 35)

Abstract

In this chapter, we propose evaluation and decision-making as activities which, properly reconstructed from conventional norms, can be leveraged to change who and what receives access, opportunities, recognition, and status in higher education. We critically review seminal perspectives on faculty evaluation and decision-making, advance a new framework for equitable evaluation and decision-making in higher education, and consider the relevance of this framework in four functional areas of faculty practice: admission of graduate students, hiring, peer review, and curriculum and instruction.

Keywords

Equity Faculty Evaluation Decision making Admissions Hiring Peer review Curriculum 

References

  1. Aldridge, D. P. (2006). The limits of master narratives in history textbooks: An analysis of representations of Martin Luther King, Jr. Teacher’s College Review, 108(4), 662–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alon, S., & Tienda, M. (2007). Diversity, opportunity, and the shifting meritocracy in higher education. American Sociological Review, 72(4), 487–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alvarado, L. A. (2010). Dispelling the meritocracy myth: Lessons for higher education and student affairs educators. The Vermont Connection, 31(1), 10–20.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, K. J., & Smith, G. (2005). Students’ preconceptions of professors: Benefits and barriers according to ethnicity and gender. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 27(2), 184–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Apple, M. W. (1999). What counts as legitimate knowledge? The social production and use of reviews. Review of Educational Research, 69(4), 343–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bailyn, L. (2003). Academic careers and gender equity: Lessons learned from MIT 1. Gender, Work and Organization, 10(2), 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baldwin, M. (2018). Scientific autonomy, public accountability, and the rise of “peer review” in the Cold War United States. Isis, 109(3), 538–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barab, S. A., Barnett, M., & Squire, K. (2002). Developing an empirical account of a community of practice: Characterizing the essential tensions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(4), 489–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. The American Psychologist, 54(7), 462–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bastedo, M. N. (2009). Convergent institutional logics in public higher education: State policymaking and governing board activism. The Review of Higher Education, 32(2), 209–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bastedo, M. N., & Bowman, N. A. (2017). Improving admission of low-SES students at selective colleges: Results from an experimental simulation. Educational Researcher, 46(2), 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bastedo, M. N., & Jaquette, O. (2011). Running in place: Low-income students and the dynamics of higher education stratification. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(3), 318–339.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373711406718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bastedo, M., Bowman, N., Glasener, K., & Kelly, J. (2018). What are we talking about when we talk about holistic review? Selective college admissions and its effects on low-SES students. The Journal of Higher Education, 89(5), 782–805.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2018.1442633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Battilana, J. (2006). Agency and institutions: The enabling role of individuals’ social position. Organization, 13(5), 653–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bauman, G. L., Bustillos, L. T., Bensimon, E. M., Brown, M. C., & Bartee, R. (2005). Achieving equitable educational outcomes with all students: The institution’s roles and responsibilities. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.Google Scholar
  17. Becher, T. (1981). Towards a definition of disciplinary cultures. Studies in Higher Education, 6(2), 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Becher, T. (1987). Disciplinary discourse. Studies in Higher Education, 12(3), 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (1989). Academic tribes and territories. Buckingham: SRHE.Google Scholar
  20. Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Beckert, J., & Musselin, C. (2013). Constructing quality: The classification of goods in markets. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bedeian, A. G. (2004). Peer review and the social construction of knowledge in the management discipline. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3(2), 198–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Bell, R. L., & Chong, H. G. (2010). A caste and class among the relative frequency of faculty’s publications: A content analysis of refereed business journals. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 8(1), 65–89.Google Scholar
  24. Bensimon, E. M. (2005). Closing the achievement gap in higher education: An organizational learning perspective. New Directions for Higher Education, 2005(131), 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Bensimon, E. M. (2012). The equity scorecard: Theory of change. In E. M. Bensimon & L. Malcom (Eds.), Confronting equity issues on campus: Implementing the equity scorecard in theory and practice (pp. 17–44). Sterling: Stylus.Google Scholar
  26. Bensimon, E. M., & Malcom, L. E. (2012). Confronting equity issues on campus. Sterling: Stylus.Google Scholar
  27. Bensimon, E. M., Rueda, R., Dowd, A. C., & Harris III, F. (2007). Accountability, equity, and practitioner learning and change. Metropolitan, 18(3), 28–45.Google Scholar
  28. Berquist, W. H., & Pawlak, K. (2007). Engaging the six cultures of the academy: Revised and expanded edition of the four cultures of the academy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  29. Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review, 94(4), 991–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Bielby, R., Posselt, J. R., Jaquette, O., & Bastedo, M. N. (2014). Why are women underrepresented in elite colleges and universities? A non-linear decomposition analysis. Research in Higher Education, 55(8), 735–760.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-014-9334-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Blankenship-Knox, A. E., Platt, E. R., & Read, H. (2017). Rewarding collegiality: The use of collegiality as a factor in faculty evaluation and employment decisions. Journal of Faculty Development, 31(2), 37–42.Google Scholar
  32. Bok, D. (2009). Our underachieving colleges: A candid look at how much students learn and why they should be learning more-new edition (Vol. 2). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Boltanski, L., & Thevenot, L. (2000) The reality of moral expectations: A sociology of situated judgment. Philosophical Explorations, 3(3), 208–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Boltanski, L., Thévenot, L., & Porter, C. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Boring, A. (2017). Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching. Journal of Public Economics, 145, 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Bourdieu, P. (1998). The state nobility: Elite schools in the field of power. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Bowman, N. A., & Bastedo, M. N. (2018). What role may admissions office diversity and practices play in equitable decisions? Research in Higher Education, 59(4), 430–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Brand, A. (2013). Point of view: Faculty appointments and the record of scholarship. eLife, 2, e00452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Briihl, D., & Wasieleski, D. (2004). A survey of master’s-level psychology programs: Admissions criteria and program policies. Teaching of Psychology, 31(4), 252–256.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top3104_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Brookfield, S. D. (2017). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. Wiley.Google Scholar
  42. Brownell, S. E., & Tanner, K. D. (2012). Barriers to faculty pedagogical change: Lack of training, time, incentives, and… tensions with professional identity? CBE – Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 339–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Caffarella, R. S., & Zinn, L. F. (1999). Professional development for faculty: A conceptual framework of barriers and supports. Innovative Higher Education, 23(4), 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Caldwell, C., Shapiro, J. P., & Gross, S. J. (2007). Ethical leadership in higher education admission: Equality vs. equity. Journal of College Admission, 195, 14–19.Google Scholar
  45. Campbell, C. M., & O’Meara, K. (2014). Faculty agency: Departmental contexts that matter in faculty careers. Research in Higher Education, 55(1), 49–74.Google Scholar
  46. Carlin, P. S., Kidd, M. P., Rooney, P. M., & Denton, B. (2013). Academic wage structure by gender: The roles of peer review, performance, and market forces. Southern Economic Journal, 80(1), 127–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Carter, D. F., Dueñas, J. E. R., & Mendoza, R. (2019). Critical examination of the role of STEM in propagating and maintaining race and gender disparities. In M. B. Paulsen and L. W. Perna (Eds) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 34 (39–97). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  48. Christensen, D., Nance, W., & White, D. (2012). Academic performance in MBA programs: Do prerequisites really matter? Journal of Education for Business, 87(1), 42–47.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2011.555790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Christensen, M., Lykkegaard, E., Lund, O., & O’Neill, L. (2018). Qualitative analysis of MMI raters’ scorings of medical school candidates: A matter of taste? Advances in Health Sciences Education, 23(2), 289–310.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-017-9794-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Cipriano, R. E., & Buller, J. L. (2012). Rating faculty collegiality. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 44(2), 45–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Cole, S. (1983). The hierarchy of the sciences? American Journal of Sociology, 89(1), 111–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Cole, S., & Simon, G. A. (1981). Chance and consensus in peer review. Science, 214(4523), 881–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Contreras, F. E. (2005). The reconstruction of merit post-proposition 209. Educational Policy, 19(2), 371–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Corbally, J. E., & Sergiovanni, T. J. (Eds.). (1986). Leadership and organizational culture: New perspectives on administrative theory and practice. Oxford: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  55. Correll, S. J., Benard, S., & Paik, I. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology, 112(5), 1297–1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Culpepper, S. A., & Davenport, E. C. (2009). Assessing differential prediction of college grades by race/ethnicity with a multilevel model. Journal of Educational Measurement, 46(2), 220–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Cureton, E. E., Cureton, L. W., & Bishop, R. (1949). Predictions of success in graduate study at the University of Tennessee. American Psychologist, 4, 361–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Deephouse, D. L., & Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 49–77). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Delgado, R. (1984). The imperial scholar: Reflections on a review of civil rights literature. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 132(3), 561–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Delgado Bernal, D., & Villalpando, O. (2002). An apartheid of knowledge in academia: The struggle over the “legitimate” knowledge of faculty of color. Equity & Excellence in Education, 35(2), 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Dowd, A. C., & Bensimon, E. M. (2015). Engaging the “race question”: Accountability and equity in US higher education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  62. Ehrenberg, R. G., Jakubson, G. H., Martin, M. L., Main, J. B., & Eisenberg, T. (2012). Diversifying the faculty across gender lines: Do trustees and administrators matter? Economics of Education Review, 31(1), 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar
  64. Espeland, W. N., & Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Felix, E. R., Bensimon, E. M., Hanson, D., Gray, J., & Klingsmith, L. (2015). Developing agency for equity-minded change. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2015(172), 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Freeman, S., & DiRamio, D. (2016). Elitism or pragmatism? Faculty hiring at top graduate programs In higher education administration. The Journal of the Professoriate, 8, 94–127.Google Scholar
  68. Garces, L. M. (2014). Aligning diversity, quality, and equity: The implications of legal and public policy developments for promoting racial diversity in graduate studies. American Journal of Education, 120(4), 457–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Gay, G. (1990). Achieving educational equality through curriculum desegregation. The Phi Delta Kappan, 72(1), 56–62.Google Scholar
  70. Gildersleeve, R. E. (2010). Access between and beyond borders. Journal of College Admission, 206, 3–10.Google Scholar
  71. Gonzales, L. D. (2013). Faculty sensemaking and mission creep: Interrogating institutionalized ways of knowing and doing legitimacy. The Review of Higher Education, 36(2), 179–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Gonzales, L. D., & Núñez, A.-M. (2014). The ranking regime and the production of knowledge: Implications for academia. Education Analysis Policy Archives, 22(31).  https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v22n31.2014.
  73. Gonzales, L. D., & Rincones, R. (2012). Interdisciplinary scholars: Negotiating legitimacy at the core and from the margins. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 36(4), 495–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Gonzales, L. D., & Terosky, A. L. (2016). From the faculty perspective: Defining, earning, and maintaining legitimacy across academia. Teachers College Record, 118(7), 1–44.Google Scholar
  75. Gordon, J. (2005). White on White: Researcher reflexivity and the logics of privilege in White schools undertaking reform. The Urban Review, 37(4), 279–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Guinier, L. (2015). The tyranny of the meritocracy: Democratizing higher education in America. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  77. Gutiérrez, K. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (2009). Why deliberative democracy?. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Halberstam, B., & Redstone, F. (2005). The predictive value of admissions materials on objective and subjective measures of graduate school performance in speech-language pathology. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(2), 261–272.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800500120183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Hamann, J., & Beljean, S. (2017). Academic evaluation in higher education. In Encyclopedia of international higher education systems and institutions (pp. 1–7). Amsterdam: Springer.Google Scholar
  81. Haro, R. (1995). Held to a higher standard: Latino executive selection in higher education. In R. V. Padilla & R. C. Chavez (Eds.), The leaning Ivory Tower: Latino professors in American universities (pp. B32–B33). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  82. Harper, S.R. (2012). Black male student success in higher education: A report from the National Black Male College Achievement Study. University of Pennsylvania, Graduate School of Education, Center for the Study of Race and Equity in Education.Google Scholar
  83. Harper, S. R., & Hurtado, S. (2007). Nine themes in campus racial climates and implications for institutional transformation. New Directions for Student Services, 2007(120), 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Harper, S. R., Smith, E. J., & Davis, C. H., III. (2018). A critical race case analysis of black undergraduate student success at an urban university. Urban Education, 53(1), 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Harris, J. C., & Patton, L. D. (2018). Un/doing intersectionality through higher education research. The Journal of Higher Education, 1–26.Google Scholar
  86. Hedlund, J., Wilt, J., Nebel, K., Ashford, S., & Sternberg, R. (2006). Assessing practical intelligence in business school admissions: A supplement to the graduate management admissions test. Learning and Individual Differences, 16(2), 101–127.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2005.07.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2017). The practice of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  88. Hirschauer, S. (2010). Editorial judgments: A praxeology of ‘voting’ in peer review. Social Studies of Science, 40(1), 71–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Hodum, R. L., & James, G. W. (2010). An observation of normative structure for college admission and recruitment officers. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 317–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Hoffman, M. (1977). Moral internalization: Current theory and research. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 85–133.Google Scholar
  91. Hojat, M., Gonnella, J. S., & Caelleigh, A. S. (2003). Impartial judgment by the “gatekeepers” of science: Fallibility and accountability in the peer review process. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 8(1), 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Hora, M. T., & Ferrare, J. J. (2013). Instructional systems of practice: A multidimensional analysis of math and science undergraduate course planning and classroom teaching. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(2), 212–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Hora, M.T., & Holden, J.I. (2012). Exploring faculty decision-making processes for using instructional technology in the classroom. University of Wisconsin. (ERICDocument Reproduction Service No. ED530736).Google Scholar
  94. Hook, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  95. Hurtado, S. (1992). The campus racial climate: Contexts of conflict. The Journal of Higher Education, 63(5), 539–569.Google Scholar
  96. Hyland, K. (1999). Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 20(3), 341–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Jaquette, O., Curs, B. R., & Posselt, J. R. (2016). Tuition rich, mission poor: Nonresident enrollment growth and the socioeconomic and racial composition of public research universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 87(5), 635–673.Google Scholar
  98. June, A.W. (2017, November 22). When ‘collegiality’ and evaluating faculty collide. Chronicle of higher education. Retrieved April 1, 2019 from https://www.chronicle.com/article/When-Collegiality-and/241862
  99. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
  100. Karabel, J. (2005). The chosen: The hidden history of admission and exclusion at Harvard, Yale, and Princeton. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  101. Karabel, J. (2006). The chosen: The hidden history of admission and exclusion at Harvard, Yale, and Princeton. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  102. Kayes, P. E. (2006). New paradigms for diversifying faculty and staff in higher education: Uncovering cultural biases in the search and hiring process. Multicultural Education, 14(2), 65–69.Google Scholar
  103. Kezar, A., & Gehrke, S. (2016). Faculty composition in four-year institutions: The role of pressures, values, and organizational processes in academic decision-making. The Journal of Higher Education, 87(3), 390–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Khan, S. (2012). The sociology of elites. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 361–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Kobrin, J., & Patterson, B. (2011). Contextual factors associated with the validity of SAT scores and high school GPA for predicting first-year college grades. Educational Assessment, 16(4), 207–226.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2011.635956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Koys, D. J. (2005). The validity of the graduate management admissions test for non-US students. Journal of Education for Business, 80(4), 236–239.  https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.80.4.236-239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Kuncel, N. R., & Hezlett, S. A. (2007). Standardized tests predict graduate students’ success. Science, 315(5815), 1080–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2001). A comprehensive meta-analysis of the predictive validity of the graduate record examinations: Implications for graduate student selection and performance. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 162–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Kyllonen, P., Walters, A. M., & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Noncognitive constructs and their assessment in graduate education: A review. Educational Assessment, 10(3), 153–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Laird, T. F. N., Shoup, R., Kuh, G. D., & Schwarz, M. J. (2008). The effects of discipline on deep approaches to student learning and college outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 49(6), 469–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Lamont, M. (2009). How professors think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Lamont, M. (2012). Toward a comparative sociology of valuation and evaluation. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 201–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Lamont, M., Beljean, S., & Clair, M. (2014). What is missing? Cultural processes and causal pathways to inequality. Socio-Economic Review, 12(3), 573–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Lanham, B. D., Schauer, E. J., & Osho, G. S. (2011). A comprehensive analysis of the efficacy of non-cognitive measures: Predicting academic success in a historically Black university in South Texas. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 8(4), 43–51.  https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v8i4.4193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Lannholm, G.V. (1968). Cooperative studies of predicting graduate school success. Graduate record examinations special report number 68-3.Google Scholar
  116. Lattuca, L. R. (2005). Faculty work as learning: Insights from theories of cognition. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 102, 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Lattuca, L. R., & Stark, J. S. (2011). Shaping the college curriculum: Academic plans in context. San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
  118. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Lee, C. D., & Chun, E. (2014). Search committees: A comprehensive guide to successful faculty, staff, and administrative searches (2nd ed.). Sterling: Stylus Publishing.Google Scholar
  120. Liera, R. (2018). Faculty learning and agency for racial equity (Doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California.Google Scholar
  121. Liera, R., & Dowd, A. C. (2018). Faculty learning at boundaries to broker racial equity. The Journal of Higher Education, 90, 1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2018.1512805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Littleford, L., Buxton, K., Bucher, M., Simon-Dack, S., & Yang, K. (2018). Psychology doctoral program admissions: What master’s and undergraduate-level students need to know. Teaching of Psychology, 45(1), 75–83.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628317745453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Littler, J. (2017). Against meritocracy: Culture, power and myths of mobility. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  124. Liu, A. (2011). Unraveling the myth of meritocracy within the context of US higher education. Higher Education, 62(4), 383–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. MacNell, L., Driscoll, A., & Hunt, A. N. (2015). What’s in a name: Exposing gender bias in student ratings of teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 40(4), 291–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Mann, S. J. (2001). Alternative perspectives on the student experience: Alienation and engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 26(1), 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. March, J. G. (1994). Primer on decision making: How decisions happen. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  128. Marine, S. B. (2017). Changing the frame: Queering access to higher education for trans∗ students. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30(3), 217–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Massey, D. (2007). Categorically unequal: The American stratification system. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  130. Mattern, K., & Patterson, B. (2013). Test of slope and intercept bias in college admissions: A response to Aguinis, Culpepper, and Pierce (2010). Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(1), 134–147.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Mattern, K., Shaw, E., & Kobrin, J. (2011). An alternative presentation of incremental validity: Discrepant SAT and HSGPA performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71(4), 638–662.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164410383563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. McKenna, A., Yalvac, B., & Light, G.J. (2009). The role of collaborative reflection on shaping engineering faculty teaching approaches. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1), 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Milkman, K. L., Akinola, M., & Chugh, D. (2015). What happens before? A field experiment exploring how pay and representation differentially shape bias on the pathway into organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(6), 1678–1712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Miller, C. C. (2006). From the editors: Peer review in the organizational and management sciences: Prevalence and effects of reviewer hostility, bias, and dissensus. The Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 425–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Miller, C., & Stassun, K. (2014). A test that fails. Nature, 510(7504), 303–304.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7504-303a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Miller, C. W., Zwickl, B. M., Posselt, J. R., Silvestrini, R. T., & Hodapp, T. (2019). Typical physics Ph. D. admissions criteria limit access to underrepresented groups but fail to predict doctoral completion. Science Advances, 5(1), eaat7550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Milner, H. R., IV. (2007). Race, culture, and researcher positionality: Working through dangers seen, unseen, and unforeseen. Educational Researcher, 36(7), 388–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Mitchell, K. M., & Martin, J. (2018). Gender bias in student evaluations. PS: Political Science & Politics, 51(3), 648–652.Google Scholar
  139. Morrison, G. Z. (2010). Two separate worlds: Students of color at a predominantly white university. Journal of Black Studies, 40(5), 987–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Moore, D. A., Swift, S. A., Sharek, Z. S., & Gino, F. (2010). Correspondence bias in performance evaluation: Why grade inflation works. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(6), 843–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Moses, M. S., & Chang, M. J. (2006). Toward a deeper understanding of the diversity rationale. Educational Researcher, 35(1), 6–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Moss-Racusin, C. (2012). Are science faculty biased against female students? Society of Personality and Social Psychology Connections. Retrieved from https://spsptalks.wordpress.com/2012/09/21/are-science-faculty-biased-against-female-students/
  143. Mountford, M., Ehlert, M., Machell, J., & Cockrell, D. (2007). Traditional and personal admissions criteria: Predicting candidate performance in US educational leadership programmes. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 10(2), 191–210.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13603120600935696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Murphy, S., Klieger, D., Borneman, M., & Kuncel, N. (2009). The predictive power of personal statements in admissions: A meta-analysis and cautionary tale. College and University, 84(4), 83–86.Google Scholar
  145. Museus, S.D., Ledesma, M., & Parker, T. (2015). Racism and racial equity in higher education. ASHE Higher Education Reader.Google Scholar
  146. Nash, K. (2019). Neo-liberalisation, universities and the values of bureaucracy. The Sociological Review, 67(1), 178–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Neumann, A. (2009). Professing to learn: Creating tenured lives and careers in the American research university (No. 475). Baltimore: JHU Press.Google Scholar
  148. Neumann, A. (2014). Staking a claim on learning: What we should know about learning in higher education and why. The Review of Higher Education, 37(2), 249–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Neumann, R., Parry, S., & Becher, T. (2002). Teaching and learning in their disciplinary contexts: A conceptual analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 27(4), 405–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Park, J. J., & Liu, A. (2014). Interest convergence or divergence? A critical race analysis of Asian Americans, meritocracy, and critical mass in the affirmative action debate. The Journal of Higher Education, 85(1), 36–64.Google Scholar
  151. Pascarella, E. T. (1985). College environmental influences on learning and cognitive development: A critical review and synthesis. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 1). New York: Agathon.Google Scholar
  152. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  153. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research (Vol. 2). Indianapolis: Jossey-Bass, An Imprint of Wiley.Google Scholar
  154. Pascarella, E. T., Blaich, C., Martin, G. L., & Hanson, J. M. (2011). How robust are the findings of academically adrift? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 43(3), 20–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Patton, L. D., Harper, S. R., & Harris, J. (2015). Using critical race theory to (re)interpret widely- studied topics related to students in U.S. higher education. In Martínez Alemán, A. M., Bensimon, E. M., Pusser, B. (Eds.), Critical approaches to the study of higher education (pp. 193–219). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  156. Paxton, P., & Bollen, K. A. (2003). Perceived quality and methodology in graduate department ratings: Sociology, political science, and economics. Sociology of Education, 76(1), 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Pittman, C. T. (2010). Race and gender oppression in the classroom: The experiences of women faculty of color with white male students. Teaching Sociology, 38(5), 183–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Posselt, J. R. (2014). Toward inclusive excellence in graduate education: Constructing merit and diversity in PhD admissions. American Journal of Education, 120(4), 481–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Posselt, J. R. (2015). Disciplinary logics in doctoral admissions: Understanding patterns of faculty evaluation. Journal of Higher Education, 86(6), 807–833.  https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2015.0030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Posselt, J. R. (2016). Inside graduate admissions: Merit, diversity, and faculty gatekeeping. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Posselt, J. R. (2018). Trust networks: A new perspective on pedigree and the ambiguities of admissions. The Review of Higher Education, 41(4), 497–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Posselt, J.R., & Miller, C.W. (2018, May). It’s time for the talk. Inside Higher Ed. Google Scholar
  163. Posselt, J. R., Jaquette, O., Bielby, R., & Bastedo, M. N. (2012). Access without equity: Longitudinal analyses of institutional stratification by race and ethnicity, 1972–2004. American Educational Research Journal, 49(6), 1074–1111.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212439456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Posselt, J., Hernandez, T., Cochran, G., & Miller, C. (in press). Metrics first, diversity later? Making the short list and getting admitted to selective physics Ph.D. programs. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering.  https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2019027863 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Potvin, G., Chari, D., & Hodapp, T. (2017). Investigating approaches to diversity in a national survey of physics doctoral degree programs: The graduate admissions landscape. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 020142-1–020142-13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. Powell, W. W. (1985). Getting into print: The decision-making process in scholarly publishing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  167. Quaye, S. J., & Harper, S. R. (2007). Faculty accountability for culturally inclusive pedagogy and curriculua. Liberal Education, 93(3), 32–39.Google Scholar
  168. Quaye, S. J., & Harper, S. R. (Eds.). (2014). Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  169. Raelin, J. (2008). Refereeing the game of peer review. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(1), 124–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. Redding, A. B. (2013). Supporting international applicants and promoting an ethical model of global college admission. Journal of College Admission, 219, 8–15.Google Scholar
  171. Rendón, L. I. (1994). Validating culturally diverse students: Toward a new model of learning and student development. Innovative Higher Education, 19(1), 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. Rivera, L. A. (2017). When two bodies are (not) a problem: Gender and relationship status discrimination in academic hiring. American Sociological Review, 82(6), 1111–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. Roberts, T. J., & Shambrook, J. (2012). Academic excellence: A commentary and reflections on the inherent value of peer review. Journal of Research Administration, 43(1), 33–38.Google Scholar
  174. Roberts, S. G., & Verhoef, T. (2016). Double-blind reviewing at EvoLang 11 reveals gender bias. Journal of Language Evolution, 1(2), 163–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  176. Rose, G. (1997). Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography, 21(3), 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. Rowland, F. (2002). The peer-review process. Learned Publishing, 15(4), 247–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. Sagaria, M. A. D. (2002). An exploratory model of filtering in administrative searches: Toward counter-hegemonic discourses. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(6), 677–710.Google Scholar
  179. Salinas, C. (2018). A case study for a new peer-review journal on race and ethnicity in American higher education. Publications, 6(2), 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  180. Sandler, B.R. (1996). The chilly classroom climate: A guide to improve the education of women. Association of American Colleges, Project on the Status and Education of Women. Google Scholar
  181. Sauder, M., & Espeland, W. N. (2009). The discipline of rankings: Tight coupling and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. Sawyer, R. (2013). Beyond correlations: Usefulness of high school GPA and test scores in making college admissions decisions. Applied Measurement in Education, 26(2), 89–112.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2013.765433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. Schein, E. H. (1990). Organizational culture. The American Psychologist, 45(2), 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  184. Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (Vol. 2). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  185. Schwartzman, R. (1997). Peer review as the enforcement of disciplinary orthodoxy. Southern Communication Journal, 63(1), 69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. Sedlacek, W. E. (2004). Beyond the big test: Noncognitive assessment in higher education. Indianapolis: Jossey-Bass, An Imprint of Wiley.Google Scholar
  187. Seldin, P. (1995). Improving college teaching. Bolton: Anker Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  188. Sensoy, O., & DiAngelo, R. (2017). “We are all for diversity, but…”: How faculty hiring committees reproduce whiteness and practical change for how they can change. Harvard Educational Review, 87(4), 557–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  189. Shivpuri, S., Schmitt, N., Oswald, F., & Kim, B. (2006). Individual differences in academic growth: Do they exist, and can we predict them? Journal of College Student Development, 47(1), 69–86.  https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2006.0013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  191. Siler, K., & Strang, D. (2017). Peer review and scholarly originality: Let 1,000 flowers bloom, but don’t step on any. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 42(1), 29–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  192. Sinha, R., Oswald, F., Imus, A., & Schmitt, N. (2011). Criterion-focused approach to reducing adverse impact in college admissions. Applied Measurement in Education, 24(2), 137–161.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2011.554605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  193. Sireci, S., & Talento-Miller, E. (2006). Evaluating the predictive validity of graduate management admission test scores. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(2), 305–317.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  194. Smith, M. J. (2008). Four steps to a paradigm shift: Employing critical perspectives to improve outreach to low-SES African-American and Latino students and their parents. Journal of College Admission, 201, 17–23. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/219164492/.Google Scholar
  195. Smith, D. G. (2009). Diversity’s promise for higher education: Making it work. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  196. Smith, D. G. (2015). Diversity’s promise for higher education: Making it work. Baltimore: JHU Press.Google Scholar
  197. Smith, D. G., & Garrison, G. (2005). The impending loss of talent: An exploratory study challenging assumptions about testing and merit. Teachers College Record, 107(4), 629–653.Google Scholar
  198. Smith, D. G., Wolf, L. E., Busenberg, B., et al. (1996). Achieving faculty diversity: Debunking the myths. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.Google Scholar
  199. Smith, D. G., Turner, C. S. V., Osei-Kofi, N., & Richards, S. (2004). Interrupting the usual: Successful strategies for hiring diverse faculty. The Journal of Higher Education, 75(2), 133–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  200. Solórzano, D., Ceja, M., & Yosso, T. (2000). Critical race theory, racial microaggressions, and campus racial climate: The experiences of African American college students. Journal of Negro Education, 60–73.Google Scholar
  201. Sommerfeld, A. (2011). Recasting non-cognitive factors in college readiness as what they truly are: Non-academic factors. Journal of College Admission, 213, 18–22.Google Scholar
  202. Sorey, K., & Duggan, M. H. (2008). Homeschoolers entering community colleges: Perceptions of admission officers. Journal of College Admission, 200, 22–28.Google Scholar
  203. Squire, D.D. (2019). “It’s pretty essential”: A critical race counter-narrative of faculty of color understandings of diversity and equity in doctoral admissions. The Urban Review, 1–25.Google Scholar
  204. Stanley, C. A. (2007). When counter narratives meet master narratives in the journal editorial-review process. Educational Researcher, 36(1), 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  205. Stanny, C., Gonzalez, M., & McGowan, B. (2015). Assessing the culture of teaching and learning through a syllabus review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(7), 898–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  206. Stanton-Salazar, R. D. (2011). A social capital framework for the study of institutional agents and their role in the empowerment of low-status students and youth. Youth & Society, 43(3), 1066–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  207. Stegmeir, M. (2017). Muslims on campus: College-bound students, schools contend with rising intolerance. Journal of College Admission, 237, 34–39.Google Scholar
  208. Stevens, M. (2007). Creating a class: College admissions and the education of elites. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  209. Storage, D., Horne, Z., Cimpian, A., & Leslie, S. J. (2016). The frequency of “brilliant” and “genius” in teaching evaluations predicts the representation of women and African Americans across fields. PLoS One, 11(3), e0150194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  210. Stupnisky, R. H., BrckaLorenz, A., Yuhas, B., & Guay, F. (2018). Faculty members’ motivation for teaching and best practices: Testing a model based on self-determination theory across institution types. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 53, 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  211. Sulik, G., & Keys, J. (2014). “Many students really do not yet know how to behave!” The syllabus as a tool for socialization. Teaching Sociology, 42(2), 151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  212. Swartz, D.L. (2016). Bourdieu’s concept of field. Oxford Bibliographies. Retrieved from http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199756384/obo-9780199756384-0164.xml
  213. Tate, W. F., IV. (1997). Critical race theory and education: History, theory, and implications. Review of Research in Education, 23, 191–243.Google Scholar
  214. Thomas, L., Kuncel, N., & Crede, M. (2007). Noncognitive variables in college admissions: The case of the non-cognitive questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(4), 635–657.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164406292074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  215. Thornton, P. H. (2004). Markets from culture: Institutional logics and organizational decisions in higher education publishing. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  216. Tierney, W. G. (1993). Building communities of difference: Higher education in the twenty-first century. Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  217. Tierney, W. G. (2008). The impact of culture on organizational decision-making: Theory and practice in higher education. Sterling: Stylus Publishing, LLC.Google Scholar
  218. Tierney, W. G., & Bensimon, E. M. (1996). Promotion and tenure: Community and socialization in academe. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  219. Tierney, W. G., & Blumberg Corwin, Z. (2007). The tensions between academic freedom and institutional review boards. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(3), 388–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  220. Tomkins, A., Zhang, M., & Heavlin, W. D. (2017). Reviewer bias in single-versus double-blind peer review. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(48), 12708–12713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  221. Trix, F., & Psenka, C. (2003). Exploring the color of glass: Letters of recommendation for female and male medical faculty. Discourse & Society, 14(2), 191–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  222. Turner, C. S. V. (2002). Diversifying the faculty: A guidebook for search committees. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.Google Scholar
  223. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  224. Twombly, S. B. (2005). Values, policies, and practices affecting the hiring process for full-time arts and sciences faculty in community colleges. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(4), 423–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  225. Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  226. Uzuner-Smith, S., & Englander, K. (2015). Exposing ideology within university policies: A critical discourse analysis of faculty hiring, promotion and remuneration practices. Journal of Education Policy, 30(1), 62–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  227. Villarreal, C. D., Liera, R., & Malcom-Piqueux, L. (2019). The role of niceness in silencing racially minoritized faculty. In A. E. Castagno (Ed.), The price of nice: How good intentions maintain educational inequity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  228. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (Vol. 2). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  229. Wechsler, H. S. (2017). The qualified student: A history of selective college admission in America. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  230. Wenger, E. (2010). Communities of practice and social learning systems: The career of a concept. In Social learning systems and communities of practice (pp. 179–198). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  231. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). A sociocultural approach to socially shared cognition. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (p. 85–100). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  232. White, C. B., Dey, E. L., & Fantone, J. C. (2009). Analysis of factors that predict clinical performance in medical school. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14(4), 623–623.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-009-9189-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  233. Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  234. Yosso, T. J. (2006). Critical race counterstories along the Chicana/Chicano educational pipeline. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  235. Zwick, R. (2017). Who gets in?: Strategies for fair and effective college admissions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julie Posselt
    • 1
    Email author
  • Theresa E. Hernandez
    • 2
  • Cynthia D. Villarreal
    • 2
  • Aireale J. Rodgers
    • 2
  • Lauren N. Irwin
    • 2
  1. 1.Rossier School of EducationUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Laura W. Perna
    • 1
  • Ann Austin
    • 2
  • Stephen DesJardins
  • Linda Eisenmann
  • Pamela Eddy
    • 3
  • Adrianna Kezar
    • 4
  • Anne-Marie Nunez
  • Shouping Hu
  • Anna Neumann
    • 5
  • Nicholas A Bowman
  • Marvin Titus
  1. 1.Graduate School of EducationUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Michigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  3. 3.College of William and MaryWilliamsburgUSA
  4. 4.School of EducationUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  5. 5.Higher and Postsecondary EducationTeachers College, Columbia UniversityNew York CityUSA

Personalised recommendations