Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education

2019 Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho

Multi-disciplinarity

  • Michal J. BardeckiEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11352-0_90

Abstract

This paper explores both the origins and usage of the term “multidisciplinarity” and its related cognates such as interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity – particularly in their application to the study of sustainable development. Generally, there has been a lack of consistency and precision in the definitions and use of these terms. In its most precise usage in research, multidisciplinarity does not challenge or transcend conventional disciplinary boundaries, but rather individuals (or disciplinary-focused groups) work on distinct aspects of the common undertaking within the context their own disciplinary base, providing a different perspective on the problem or issue. From the perspective of education, multidisciplinarity does refer to the ability of students to access courses taught by disciplines outside their area of study (i.e., “service subjects”).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aboelela SW, Larson E, Bakken S, Carrasquillo O, Formicola A, Glied SA, Haas J, Gebbie KM (2007) Defining interdisciplinary research: conclusions from a critical review of the literature. Health Serv Res 42:329–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvargonzález D (2011) Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, transdisciplinarity, and the sciences. Int Stud Philos Sci 25(4):387–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bäckstrand K (2003) Civic science for sustainability: reframing the role of experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance. Global Environ Polit 3:24–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boix Mansilla V, Duraising ED (2007) Targeted assessment of students’ interdisciplinary work: an empirically grounded framework proposed. J High Educ 78(2):215–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borrego M, Newswander LK (2010) Definitions of interdisciplinary research: toward graduate-level interdisciplinary learning outcomes. Rev High Educ 34(1):61–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruce A, Lyall C, Tait J, Williams R (2004) Interdisciplinary integration in Europe: the case of the Fifth Framework Programme. Futures 36:457–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brugmann R, Côté N, Postma N, Shaw EA, Pal D, Robinson JB (2019) Expanding student engagement in sustainability: using SDG-and CEL-focused inventories to transform curriculum at the University of Toronto. Sustainability 11(2):530.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caldwell LK (1983) Environmental studies: discipline or metadiscipline? Environ Prof 5:247–259Google Scholar
  9. Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI) (1972) Interdisciplinarity: problems of teaching and research in Universities. OECD Publications Center, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  10. Choi BC, Pak AW (2006) Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. Clin Invest Med 29(6):351–364Google Scholar
  11. Churchman CW (1967) Wicked problems. Manag Sci 14(4):141–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark WC, Dickson NM (2003) Sustainability science: the emerging research program. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:8059–8061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dovers S (2010) Embedded scales: interdisciplinary and institutional issues. In: Brown VA, Harris JA, Russell JY (eds) Tackling wicked problems through the transdisciplinary imagination. Earthscan, London, pp 182–192Google Scholar
  14. Duncker E (2001) Symbolic communication in multidisciplinary cooperations. Sci Technol Hum Values 26(3):349–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. El-Jardali F, Ataya N, Fadlallah R (2018) Changing roles of universities in the era of SDGs: rising up to the global challenge through institutionalising partnerships with governments and communities. Health Res Policy Syst 16(1):38.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0318-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Evely AC, Fazey I, Lambin X, Lambert E, Allen S, Pinard M (2010) Defining and evaluating the impact of cross-disciplinary conservation research. Environ Conserv 37(4):442–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frank R (1988) Interdisciplinary’: the first half century. Issues Integr Stud 6:139–151Google Scholar
  18. Froedman R (2013) Sustainable knowledge: a theory of Interdisciplinarity. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Garcia J, da Silva SA, Carvalho AS, de Andrade JBSO (2017) Education for sustainable development and its role in the promotion of the sustainable development goals. In: Davim JP (ed) Curricula for sustainability in higher education. Springer, Cham, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  20. Harpe BDL, Thomas I (2009) Curriculum change in universities: conditions that facilitate education for sustainable development. J Educ Sustain Dev 3(1):75–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huutoniemi K, Klein JT, Bruun H, Hukkinen J (2010) Analyzing interdisciplinarity: typology and indicators. Res Policy 39(1):79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jantsch E (1972) Towards interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in education and innovation. In: Centre for educational research and innovation interdisciplinarity: problems of teaching and research in Universities. OECD Publications Center, Washington, DC, pp 97–121Google Scholar
  23. Jarzebski MP, Kudo S (2016) The ecological domain in the sustainability science research and education. Ecol Quest 24:65–74Google Scholar
  24. Kajikawa Y, Ohno J, Takeda Y, Matsushima K, Komiyama H (2007) Creating an academic landscape of sustainability science: an analysis of the citation network. Sustain Sci 2(2):221–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kates RW, Dasgupta P (2007) A grand challenge for sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(43):16747–16750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Klein JT (1990) Interdisciplinarity: history, theory, and practice. Wayne State University Press, DetroitGoogle Scholar
  27. Koc M (2016) Sustainability: a tool for food system reform? In: Blay-Palmer A (ed) Imagining sustainable food systems: theory and practice. AShgate, Surrey, pp 37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kolb M, Fröhlich L, Schmidpeter R (2017) Implementing sustainability as the new normal: responsible management education – from a private business school’s perspective. Int J Manag Educ 15(2):280–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Komiyama H, Takeuchi K (2006) Sustainability science: building a new discipline. Sustain Sci 1(1):1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M, Stauffacher M, Martens P, Moll P, Swilling M, Thomas CJ (2012) Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustain Sci 7(1):25–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lattuca LR (2001) Creating interdisciplinarity: interdisciplinary research and teaching among College and University Faculty. Vanderbilt University Press, NashvilleGoogle Scholar
  32. Leal Filho W, Azeiteiro U, Alves F, Pace P, Mifsud M, Brandli L, Caeiro SS, Disterheft A (2018) Reinvigorating the sustainable development research agenda: the role of the sustainable development goals (SDG). Int J Sust Dev World 25(2):131–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Max-Neef MA (2005) Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecol Econ 53:5–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mihelcic JR, Crittenden JC, Small MJ, Shonnard DR, Hokanson DR, Zhang Q, Chen H, Sorby SA, James VU, Sutherland JW, Schnoor JL (2003) Sustainability science and engineering: the emergence of a new metadiscipline. Environ Sci Technol 37(23):5314–5324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Miller RC (1982) Varieties of interdisciplinary approaches in the social sciences. Issues Integr Stud 1:1–37Google Scholar
  36. Mooney S, Young D, Cobourn K, Islam S (2013) Multidisciplinary research: implications for agricultural and applied economists. J Agric Appl Econ 45(3):187–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moore J (2005) Seven recommendations for creating sustainability education at the university level: a guide for change agents. Int J Sustain High Educ 6(4):326–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Morin E (1992) Method: towards a study of humankind. In: The nature of nature, vol 1. Peter Lang, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. National Academy of Sciences (2005) Facilitating interdisciplinary research. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  40. Nicolescu B (2002) Manifesto of Transdisciplinarity (trans: Voss K). State University of New York Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  41. Nučič M (2012) Is sustainability science becoming more interdisciplinary over time? Acta Geogr Slov 52(1):216–228Google Scholar
  42. Pearson S, Honeywood S, O’Toole M (2005) Not yet learning for sustainability: the challenge of environmental education in a university. Int Res Geogr Environ Educ 14(3):173–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Popper K (1963) Conjectures and refutations: the growth of scientific knowledge. Routledge and Kegan Paul, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Quental N, Lourenco JM (2012) References, authors, journals and scientific disciplines underlying the sustainable development literature: a citation analysis. Scientometrics 90(2):361–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rosenfield PL (1992) The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Soc Sci Med 35:1343–1357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schleifer R (2002) A new kind of work: publishing, theory, and cultural studies. In: Shumway D, Dionne C (eds) Disciplining English: alternative histories, critical perspective. SUNY Press, Albany, pp 170–194Google Scholar
  47. Schoolman ED, Guest JS, Bush KF, Bell AR (2012) How interdisciplinary is sustainability research? Analyzing the structure of an emerging scientific field. Sustain Sci 7(1):67–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schoot Uiterkamp AJM, Vlek CAJ (2007) Practice and outcomes of multidisciplinary research for environmental sustainability. J Soc Issues 63(1):175–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Somerville MA, Rapaport DJ (eds) (2002) Transdisciplinarity: recreating integrated knowledge. EOLSS Publishers, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  50. Stock P, Burton RJ (2011) Defining terms for integrated (multi-inter-trans-disciplinary) sustainability research. Sustainability 3(8):1090–1113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Swart RJ, Raskin P, Robinson J (2004) The problem of the future: sustainability science and scenario analysis. Glob Environ Chang 14:137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thomas I (2009) Critical thinking, transformative learning, sustainable education, and problem-based learning in universities. J Transform Educ 7(3):245–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tress G, Tress B, Fry G (2005) Clarifying integrative research concepts in landscape ecology. Landsc Ecol 20(4):479–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wear DN (1999) Challenges to interdisciplinary discourse. Ecosystems 2(4):299–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wright TS (2002) Definitions and frameworks for environmental sustainability in higher education. High Educ Pol 15(2):105–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zarin DJ, Kainer KA, Putz FE, Schmink M, Jacobson SK (2003) Integrated graduate education and research in neotropical working forests. J For 101(6):31–37Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geography and Environmental Studies and Graduate Programs in Environmental Applied Science and ManagementRyerson UniversityTorontoCanada

Section editors and affiliations

  • Noor Adelyna Mohammed Akib
    • 1
  • Tehmina Khan
    • 2
  1. 1.Universiti Sains MalaysiaPenangMalaysia
  2. 2.School of AccountingRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia