Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education

2019 Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho

Technological Innovation for Sustainability

  • Lucas Marques MatosEmail author
  • Rosley Anholon
  • Walter Leal Filho
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11352-0_78

Introduction and Definitions

In this paper, we aim to discuss the role and importance of technological innovation for sustainable development. To do that, we divide our discussion in two major parts: First, we highlight the role of technological innovation as an engine for social prosperity and how it can alleviate and solve social and economic problems; second, we explore a range of possibilities regarding possible contributions that technological innovation can offer in solving or mitigating some of the major environmental sustainability problems of the present. The sustainable development concept was initially formulated and gained global attention since the Brundtland Commission (UNWCED 1987). Its first definitions comprised the following core sentences:

Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.

Meeting essential needs requires not only a new era of economic growth for nations in which the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Achilladelis B, Antonakis N (2001) The dynamics of technological innovation: the case of the pharmaceutical industry. Res Policy 30(4):535–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BP (2017) Shares of global primary energy consumption. BP statistical review of world energy, June 2017. Available at: https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/en/corporate/pdf/energy-economics/statistical-review-2017/bp-statistical-review-of-world-energy-2017-full-report.pdf. Accessed 1 Jan 2018
  3. Department of Economics and Social Development (DESA) (2013) Challenges to sustainable development. Available at: http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/financial-crisis/sustainable-development.html. Accessed 1 Jan 2018
  4. Elkington J (1997) Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Elliott JE (1985) Schumpeter’s theory of economic development and social change: exposition and assessment. Int J Soc Econ 12(6/7):6–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. EPA (2010) Global greenhouse gas emissions data. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global-greenhouse-gas-emissions-data. Accessed 1 Jan 2018
  7. EPA (2016) Municipal solid waste. Wastes. Available at: https://archive.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/municipal/web/html/. Accessed 1 Jan 2018
  8. Fiorelli F (2018) Technological unemployment as frictional unemployment: from Luddite to routine-biased technological change. Kybernetes 47(2):333–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Freeman C (2008) A Economia Da Inovação Industrial. Editora da Unicamp, Campinas, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  10. IEA (2016) Selected primary air pollutants and their sources, 2015. Energy and air pollutionGoogle Scholar
  11. IMF (2000) The world economy in the twentieth century: striking developments and policy lessons. World economic outlook: asset prices and the business cycle. Available at: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2016/12/31/Asset-Prices-and-the-Business-Cycle. Accessed 1 Jan 2018
  12. Kasturi P (2009) Technology and food security. Humanomics 25(2):163–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nelson RR (2006) As Fontes Do Crescimento Econômico. Editora da Unicamp, CampinasGoogle Scholar
  14. Niinimäki K, Hassi L (2011) Emerging design strategies in sustainable production and consumption of textiles and clothing. J Clean Prod 19(16):1876–1883. Elsevier LtdGoogle Scholar
  15. OCDE (2005) Oslo Manual – Inglês – Terceira Edição, Communities, 3rd edn. Available at:  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264013100-en
  16. REN21, R.E.P.N. for the 21st C (2017) Renewables 2017 global status reportGoogle Scholar
  17. Schumpeter JA (1934) The theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Reprinted. Transaction Publishers, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  18. Slack N, Chamblers S, Johnston R (2009) Administração Da Produção, 3rd edn. Editora Atlas, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  19. Solow RM (1957) Technical change and the aggregate production function. Rev Econ Stat 39(3):312–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stokes DE (2005) Pasteur’s quadrant: basic science and technological innovation. Editora da Unicamp, CampinasGoogle Scholar
  21. United Nations, S.D.K.P (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld. Accessed 1 Jan 2018
  22. UNWCED, U.N.W.C. on E and D (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  23. Weisser CR (2017) Defining sustainability in higher education: a rhetorical analysis. Int J Sustain High Educ 18(7):1076–1089  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-12-2015-0215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. World Bank (2015) Agricultural land (% of land area). Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/AG.LND.AGRI.ZS. Accessed 23 Jan 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lucas Marques Matos
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rosley Anholon
    • 1
  • Walter Leal Filho
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Materials and Manufacturing EngineeringState University of CampinasCampinasBrazil
  2. 2.Faculty of Life Sciences, World Sustainable Developoment Research and Transfer CentreHamburg University of Applied SciencesHamburgGermany

Section editors and affiliations

  • Nelson Amaro
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Sustainable DevelopmentGalileo UniversityGuatemala CityGuatemala