Skip to main content

Sustainability Balance

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education

Introduction

For many years, the construction industry has increasingly been concerned about environmental impact, usually expressed as greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, resource consumption, and waste generation. This industry consumes more than 40% of the world’s resources, requires 40% of global energy, emits 30% of GHG emissions, and uses 25% of the global water supply (UNEP 2016). To reduce these problems, sustainability goals have been incorporated into the construction industry globally.

Apart from the building and construction industry, the office buildings sector has a significant impact on the environment. It should take responsibility for its energy consumption, waste generation, greenhouse gas emissions, natural resources depletion during project lifecycle from initial stage to demolition stage (Ortiz et al. 2009). Regarding the United States (USA), buildings alone consume 39% of energy use, 72% of electricity resources, emit 39% of carbon dioxide, and consume 13.6% of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ABS (2016) Construction and the environment [Online]. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/featurearticlesbytitle/17A5995C5D55BBBDCA256CAE0015F653?OpenDocument. Accessed 9 Jan 2016

  • Ahn YH, Pearce AR (2007) Green construction: contractor experiences, expectations, and perceptions. J Green Build 2:106–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akadiri PO, Olomolaiye PO, Chinyio EA (2013) Multi-criteria evaluation model for the selection of sustainable materials for building projects. Autom Constr 30:113–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Government (2015) National Inventory by Economic Sector 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Butera FM (2010) Climatic change and the built environment. Adv Build Energy Res 4:45–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calkins M (2008) Materials for sustainable sites: a complete guide to the evaluation, selection, and use of sustainable construction materials. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen M, Chen JG, Cheng XX (2011) Life cycle incremental cost-benefit analysis of green building. Appl Mech Mater 71–78:4645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier ZA, Wang D, Vogel JT, Tatham EK, Linkov I (2013) Sustainable roofing technology under multiple constraints: a decision-analytical approach. Environ Syst Decis 33:261–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Convertino M, Baker K, Vogel J, Lu C, Suedel B, Linkov I (2013) Multi-criteria decision analysis to select metrics for design and monitoring of sustainable ecosystem restorations. Ecol Indic 26:76–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corr K, Adams I, Boynton D (2008) Water use and sustainable commercial buildings [Online]. Australian Policy Online. http://apo.org.au/resource/water-use-and-sustainable-commercial-buildings2016. Accessed 9 Jan 2016

  • Da Silva L, Ruwanpura JY (2009) Review of the LEED points obtained by Canadian building projects. J Archit Eng 15:38–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dadzie J, Ding G, Runeson G (2017) Relationship between sustainable technology and building age: evidence from Australia. Procedia Eng 180:1131–1138

    Google Scholar 

  • Darko A, Chan AP, Owusu-Manu D-G, Ameyaw EE (2017) Drivers for implementing green building technologies: an international survey of experts. J Clean Prod 145:386–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doulos LT, Tsangrassoulis A, Kontaxis PA, Kontadakis A, Topalis FV (2017) Harvesting daylight with LED or T5 fluorescent lamps? The role of dimming. Energ Buildings 140:336–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EIA report (2008) Annual energy review [Online]. https://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/annual/archive/038408.pdf. Accessed 3 Dec 2018

  • Elkington JB (1997) Cannibals With Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Energy Market Authority (2018) Singapore energy statistics [Online]. https://www.ema.gov.sg/cmsmedia/Publications_and_Statistics/Publications/SES18/Publication_Singapore_Energy_Statistics_2018.pdf. Accessed 3 Dec 2018

  • GBCA (2008a) The dollars and sense of green buildings: building the business case for green commercial buildings in Australia, Sydney, NSW, Green Building Council of Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • GBCA (2008b) Technical manual: green star office design & office as built. Green Building Council, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • GBCA (2015a) Green Star-Office v3 [Online]. https://www.gbca.org.au/green-star/rating-tools/green-star-office-design-v3-green-star-office-as-built-v3/1710.htm. Accessed 30 Mar 2017

  • GBCA (2015b) Mid-tier commercial buildings sector report [Online]. https://www.gbca.org.au/advocacy/mid-tier-commercial-office-buildings-pathway-project/36449.htm. Accessed 30 Mar 2017

  • Gluch P, Baumann H (2004) The life cycle costing (LCC) approach: a conceptual discussion of its usefulness for environmental decision-making. Build Environ 39:571–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houghton A, Vittori G, Guenther R (2009) Demystifying first-cost green building premiums in healthcare. HERD: Health Environ Res Des J 2:10–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang B-G, Tan JS (2012) Green building project management: obstacles and solutions for sustainable development. Sustain Dev 20:335–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Issa MH, Rankin JH, Christian AJ (2010) Canadian practitioners’ perception of research work investigating the cost premiums, long-term costs and health and productivity benefits of green buildings. Build Environ 45:1698–1711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kats G (2010) Greening our built world: costs, benefits, and strategies. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Kats, G, Alevantis L, Berman A, Mills E, Perlman J (2003) The costs and financial benefits of green buildings: a report to California’s sustainable building task force, Washington: Capital E

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim J-L, Greene M, Kim S (2014) Cost comparative analysis of a new green building code for residential project development. J Constr Eng Manag 140: 05014002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kneifel J (2010) Life-cycle carbon and cost analysis of energy efficiency measures in new commercial buildings. Energ Buildings 42:333–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langdon D (2007) The cost and benefit of achieving green buildings. Second Quarter. Retrieved 2 Aug 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Love PE, Niedzweicki M, Bullen PA, Edwards DJ (2011) Achieving the green building council of Australia’s world leadership rating in an office building in Perth. J Constr Eng Manag 138:652–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthiessen LF, Morris P, Langdon D, Association, CAB (2007) Cost of green revisited: reexamining the feasibility and cost impact of sustainable design in the light of increased market adoption. Continental Automated Buildings Association, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadoushani ZSM, Akbarnezhad A, Jornet, JF and Xiao, J (2017) Multi-criteria selection of façade systems based on sustainability criteria. Building and Environment 121:67–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz O, Castells F, Sonnemann G (2009) Sustainability in the construction industry: a review of recent developments based on LCA. Constr Build Mater 23:28–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohekar SD, Ramachandran M (2004) Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning – a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 8:365–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Property Council of Australia (2017) Office Market report [Online]. Australia. https://www.propertycouncil.com.au/Web/EventsServices/ResearchandData/Office_Market_Report/Web/EventsServices/ResearchServices/Office_market_report.aspx?hkey=7c43b696-cd31-4f6c-8314-4c62a4b0467a. Accessed 28 Mar 2017

  • Rehm M, Ade R (2013) Construction costs comparison between ‘green’ and conventional office buildings. Build Res Inf 41:198–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheikh N, Daim T, Kocaoglu DF (2011) Use of multiple perspectives and decision modeling for PV technology assessment. Technology Management in the Energy Smart World (PICMET), 2011 Proceedings of PICMET’11, 2011. IEEE, pp 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Si J, Marjanovic-Halburd L, Nasiri F, Bell S (2016) Assessment of building-integrated green technologies: a review and case study on applications of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) method. Sustain Cities Soc 27:106–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steven Winter Associates, I (2004) GSA LEED cost study: final report. US General Services Administration, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2016) Why buildings [Online]. http://www.unep.org/sbci/AboutSBCI/Background.asp. Accessed 9 Jan 2016

  • Vyas GS, Jha KN (2017) Benchmarking green building attributes to achieve cost effectiveness using a data envelopment analysis. Sustain Cities Soc 28:127–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCED (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Yudelson J (2010) The green building revolution. Island Press. Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Chen L, Pan W, Lu Q (2017) AHP-ANP–fuzzy integral integrated network for evaluating performance of innovative business models for sustainable building. J Constr Eng Manag 143:04017054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuo J, Xia B, Chen Q, Pullen S, Skitmore M (2016) Green building rating for office buildings – Lessions learned. J Green Build 11:131–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oanh Thi-Kieu Ho .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Ho, O.TK., Iyer-Raniga, U., Wong, J.P.C. (2019). Sustainability Balance. In: Leal Filho, W. (eds) Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11352-0_64

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics