Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education

2019 Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho

Technology-Enhanced Learning and Education for Sustainable Development

  • Belinda J. RudingerEmail author
  • Joy Kcenia O’NeilEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11352-0_368

Synonyms

Introduction

UNESCO, the United Nations agency for education, states that Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) “aims at developing competencies that empower individuals to reflect on their own actions, taking into account their current and future social, cultural, economic and environmental impacts, from a local and a global perspective” (UNESCO 2017). The term technology-enhanced learning (TEL), synonymous with e-learning, has come to reflect the wide range of possibilities of using technology as both a mode of instruction as well as a means to improve or transform learning that is sustainable. The juxtaposition of these two terms invites consideration of the role of technology in the reimagining...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Arthur WB (2009) The nature of technology: what it is and how it evolves. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Azeiteiro UM, Bacelaur-Niklau P, Caetano FJP, Caero S (2014) Education for sustainable development through e-learning in higher education: experiences from Portugal. J Clean Prod 106:308–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blewitt J (2009) New media literacy. In: Stibbe A (ed) Handbook of sustainability literacy: skills for a changing world. Green Books Ltd., TotnesGoogle Scholar
  4. Chin A, Jacobbson T (2015) TheGoals.org: mobile global education on the sustainable development goals. J Clean Prod 123:227–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clifford M (2009) Appropriate technology and appropriate design: the ability to design systems, technologies and equipment in an appropriate way. In: Stibbe A (ed) Handbook of sustainability literacy: skills for a changing world. Green Books Ltd., TotnesGoogle Scholar
  6. Diamond S, Irwin B (2013) Using e-learning for student sustainability literacy: framework and review. Int J Sustain High Educ 14(4):338–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dinsmore SP (2014) The case for universal design for learning in technology enhanced environments. Int J Cyber Ethics Educ 3(2):29–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fischer F, Wild F, Sutherland R, Zirn L (2014) Grand challenges in technology-enhanced learning: outcomes of the 3rd Alpine rendez-vous. Springer briefs in education [Kindle Edition]. Retrieved from Amazon.comCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goodman P (2001) Technology-enhanced learning: opportunities for change. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, MahwahCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gregory MS, Lodge JM (2015) Academic workload: the silent barrier to the implementation of technology-enhanced learning strategies in higher education. Distance Educ 36(2):210–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gulati R (2008) Technology-enhanced learning in developing nations: a review. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn 9(1):1–16Google Scholar
  12. Kennedy G, Judd TS, Churchward A, Gray K, Krause K-L (2008) First year students’ experiences with technology: are they really digital natives? Australas J Educ Technol 24:108–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kirkwood A (2014) Teaching and learning with technology in higher education: blended and distance education needs ‘joined-up thinking’ rather than technological determinism. Open Learn J Open Distance e-Learn 29(3):206–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kirkwood A, Price L (2014) Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is “enhanced” and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learn Media Technol 39(1):6–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Looi C-K, Seow P, Zhang B, So H-J, Chen W, Wong L-H (2010) Leveraging mobile technology for sustainable seamless learning: a research agenda. Br J Educ Technol 21(2):154–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nystrom C (1973) Towards a science of media ecology: the formulation of integrated conceptual paradigms for the study of human communication systems. Doctoral Dissertation, New York UniversityGoogle Scholar
  17. Orr D (1991) Ecological literacy: education and the transition to a postmodern world. State University of New York Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Sterling S (2001) Sustainable education: re-visioning learning and change (Schumacher Briefings) [Kindle Edition]. Retrieved from Amazon.comGoogle Scholar
  19. Timeto F (2015) Diffractive technospaces: a feminist approach to the mediations of space and representation [Kindle Edition]. Retrieved from Amazon.comGoogle Scholar
  20. Unesco Education for Sustainable Development (2017). Retrieved from: http://en.unesco.org/themes/education-sustainable-development
  21. Unesco ICT in Education Toolkit. (n.d.). Retrieved from: http://www.ictinedtoolkit.org/usere/login.php
  22. Warren SJ, Wakefield JS (2016) Affect in online discourse: the case of the United Nations millennial development goals topics. In: Tettegah SY, McCreery MP (eds) Emotions, technology, and learning. Elsevier Academic Press, WalthamGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Professional EducationUniversity of WisconsinStevens PointUSA
  2. 2.School of Education, College of Professional StudiesUniversity of Wisconsin Stevens PointStevens PointUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Judy Rogers
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Architecture and Design,Program Manager, Master of Disaster Design and DevelopmentRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia