Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education

2019 Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho

Procurement Policy for Sustainable Development

  • Ryan WalkerEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11352-0_294

Definition

Procurement policies reference actions by a multinational corporation through supply chains. Often reporting of corporate sustainability is limited to the assessment of sustainability within a corporation’s own operations and excludes supply chain actions. However, pricing pressures, regulatory variations, and externalizing of costs are the very basis for outsourcing corporate activities. In employing a supply chain, a company can limit responsibility for sustainability and profit through the supply chains actions. For this reason, procurement policies that include sustainability parameters can promote and enable sustainability in vulnerable and poor communities, which are often those most exploited by supply chain operations, particularly in developing countries.

Introduction

The effects of anthropogenic activities on the environment are increasingly evident and can be observed in environmental degradation stemming from pollution to natural resource exploitation. There is...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (2019). Retrieved from https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/standards/ghg-protocol-revised.pdf
  2. About the Sustainable Development Goals – United Nations Sustainable Development (2019). Retrieved from https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/
  3. Carroll A (1999) Corporate social responsibility. Bus Soc 38(3):268–295.  https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039903800303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. David P, Bloom M, Hillman A (2007) Investor activism, managerial responsiveness, and corporate social performance. Strateg Manag J 28(1):91–100.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Doepke M, Tertilt M (2009) Women’s Liberation: What’s in It for Men?*. Quarterly Journal Of Economics 124(4):1541–1591.  https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2009.124.4.1541
  6. Doepke M, Tertilt M, Voena A (2012) The economics and politics of women’s rights. Annu Rev Econ 4(1):339–372.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-061109-080201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grewal J, Serafeim G, Yoon A Shareholder activism on sustainability issues. Harvard Business School working paper, no. 17–003, July 2016Google Scholar
  8. Junior R, Best P, Cotter J (2013) Sustainability reporting and assurance: a historical analysis on a world-wide phenomenon. J Bus Ethics 120(1):1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1637-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lélé S (1991) Sustainable development: a critical review. World Dev 19(6):607–621.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750x(91)90197-pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Matos S, Hall J (2007) Integrating sustainable development in the supply chain: the case of life cycle assessment in oil and gas and agricultural biotechnology. J Oper Manag 25(6):1083–1102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Meadows D (1982) The limits to growth. Universe Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Meehan J, Bryde D (2011) Sustainable procurement practice. Bus Strateg Environ 20(2):94–106.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mitchell R, Agle B, Wood D (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad Manag Rev 22(4):853–886.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Perrings C (1995) Ecology, economics and ecological economics. Ambio 24(1):60–64Google Scholar
  15. Seuring S, Müller M (2008) From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J Clean Prod 16(15):1699–1710.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Venkatesan M, Luongo G (2019) SDG8 – sustainable economic growth and decent work for all. Emerald Publishing, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Walker H, Phillips W (2009) Sustainable procurement: emerging issues. Int J Procurement Manag 2(1):41.  https://doi.org/10.1504/ijpm.2009.021729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wartick S, Cochran P (1985) The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Acad Manag Rev 10(4):758–769.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1985.4279099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wood D (1991) Corporate social performance revisited. Acad Manag Rev 16(4):691.  https://doi.org/10.2307/258977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Candidate for Master in Science in Engineering and Public Policy at Northeastern UniversityPortlandUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Madhavi Venkatesan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsNortheastern UniversityBostonUSA