Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education

2019 Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho

Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs) and Sustainable Development

  • Emma ThorntonEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11352-0_284

Definition

The Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs) are the foundation of the Paris Agreement (WRI n.d.). They represent the voluntary national post-2020 climate action commitments that Parties intended to take and communicate to the United Nations (UN) Climate Change Secretariat under the 2015 Paris Agreement (WRI n.d.; Levin et al. 2015; World Bank Group 2016; Clemencon 2016). Each country developed its own commitment to combatting climate change, according to its own unique circumstances, making each INDC “nationally determined” (Levin et al. 2015). The pledges are voluntary and demonstrate a wide variety of methodologies and baselines (Clemencon 2016). When the INDCs were devised in 2015, their legal status was yet to be solidified, which made them “intended” (Levin et al. 2015). They become binding Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) when a Party ratifies the Paris Agreement (World Bank Group 2016). These INDCs collectively “contribute” towards reaching the...

Keywords

Climate negotiations Paris Climate Agreement Sustainable development Climate change Mitigation Adaptation 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Adger WN, Arnell NW, Tompkins EL (2005) Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Glob Environ Chang 15:77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anado LD, Chan G, Harle AG, M K, Moon S, Murthy SL, Clark WC (2016) Making technological innovation work for sustainable development. PNAS 113(35):9682–9690.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1525004113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ari İ (2017) The interconnection between sustainable development goals and the cliamte change negotiations: the Paris Agreement case. Special Issue on Climate Change and Energy 27–45Google Scholar
  4. Brundtland B, Khalid M, Agnelli S, Al-Athel S, Chidzero B, Fadika L et al (1987) Towards sustainable development. In: Report of the world comission on environment and development: our common future. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Chasek PS, Downie DL, Brown JW (2017) Climate change. In: Global environmental politics, 7th edn. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 162–186Google Scholar
  6. Clemencon R (2016) The two sides of the Paris climate agreement: dismal failure or historic breakthrough? J Environ Dev 25(1):3–24.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496516631362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dellasala DA, Goldstein MI (eds) (2018) Encyclopedia of the anthropocene. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  8. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) (2017) Briefing series: Sectoral implementation of nationally determined contributions (NDCs). Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), BonnGoogle Scholar
  9. Geels FW, Sovacool BK, Schwanen T, Sorrell S (2017) Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonization. Science 357(6357):1242–1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. German Development Institute (n.d.) NDC-SDG connections. Retrieved from Klimalog. https://klimalog.die-gdi.de/ndc-sdg/
  11. Godfray HC, Beddington JR, Crute IR, Haddad L, Lawrence D, Muir JF, … Toulmin C (2010) Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327(812):812–818.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185383
  12. Helland L, Hovi J, Sælen H (2018) Climate leadership by conditional commitments. Oxf Econ Pap 70(2):417–442Google Scholar
  13. Hof AF, Elzen MG, dmiraal A, Roelfsema M, Gernaat DEHJ, Vuuren DP (2017) Global and regional abatement costs of nationally determined contributions (NDCs) and of enhanced action to levels well below 2 °C and 1.5 °C. Environ Sci Pol 71:30–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. IPCC (2007) Working group II: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Retrieved from IPCC. https://www.ipcc.ch/working-group/wg2/?idp=643
  15. IPCC (2018) Special report: global warming of 1.5 C. IPCC, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  16. Jiang J, Wang W, Wang C, Liu Y (2017) Combating climate change calls for a global technological cooperation system built on the concept of ecological civilization. China J Popul Resour Environ 15(1):21–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kinley R (2017) Climate change after Paris: from turning point to transformation. Clim Pol 17(1):9–15.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1191009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Larson AM, Brockhaus M, Sunderlin WD, Duchelle A, Babon A, Dokken T, … Huynh T-B (2013) Land tenure and REDD+: the good, the bad and the ugly. Glob Environ Chang 23:678–689Google Scholar
  19. Lele SM (1991) Sustainable development: a critical review. World Dev 19(6):607–621. ElsevierCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Levin K, Rich D, Bonduki Y, Comstock M, Tirpak D, McGray H, … Waskow D (2015) Designing and preparing intended nationally determined contributions. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC. Creative CommonsGoogle Scholar
  21. Matthews HD, Caldeira K (2008) Stabilizing climate requires near-zero emissions. Geophys Res Lett 35(4).  https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032388
  22. Meadows DH, Club of Rome (1972) The limits to growth: a report for the Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. Universe Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Meinshausen M (n.d.) NDC & INDC factsheets. Retrieved from The University of Melourne Climate and Energy College. http://climatecollege.unimelb.edu.au/ndc-indc-factsheets
  24. Nelson DR (2011) Adaptation and resilience: responding to a changing climate. WIREs Clim Change 2:113–120.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rogelj J, Elzen MD, Höhne N, Fransen T, Fekete H, Winkler H, … Meinshausen M (2016) Paris agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C. Nature 534:631–639Google Scholar
  26. Taylor L (2018) Too young to vote, children strike, protest and sue for climate action. Reuters, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. UN Environment (n.d.) The emissions gap report 2018. Retrieved February 2019. https://www.unenvironment.org/resources/emissions-gap-report-2018
  28. UNFCCC (2019) Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). Retrieved from UNFCCC. https://unfccc.int/process/the-paris-agreement/nationally-determined-contributions/ndc-registry
  29. UNFCCC Secretariat (2016) Aggregate effect of the intended nationally determined contributions: an update. FCCC, MarrakechGoogle Scholar
  30. World Bank (2009) Energizing development without compromising the climate. In: World development report 2010. World Bank, Washington, DC, pp 189–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. World Bank Group (2016) Intended nationally determined contributions (INDCs). Retrieved from The World Bank. http://spappssecext.worldbank.org/sites/indc/Pages/INDCHome.aspx
  32. WRI (n.d.) INDCs. Retrieved from World Resources Institute. https://www.wri.org/our-work/topics/indcs
  33. Zhang W, Pan X (2016) Study on the demand of climate finance for developing countries based on submitted INDC. ScienceDirect 7(2):99–104Google Scholar
  34. Zhou C (2019) Can intellectual property rights within climate technology transfer work for the UNFCCC and the Paris Agreement? Int Environ Agreements: Polit Law Econ 19(1):107–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zyl HV, Lewis Y, Kinghorn J, Reeler J (2018) The cost of achieving South Africa’s ‘fair share’ of global climate change mitigation. Clim Pol 18(10):1327–1339CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Northeastern UniversityBostonUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Madhavi Venkatesan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsNortheastern UniversityBostonUSA