Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education

2019 Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho

Transdisciplinarity and Sustainable Development

  • Marc CrapsEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11352-0_234

Introducing Transdisciplinarity: Beyond Multi- and Interdisciplinarity

According to Thomas Kuhn, practitioners of a scientific discipline share symbolic generalizations, models and exemplars, which define the problems and possible solutions offered by their discipline (Kuhn 1970; Aram 2004). Disciplines are the basic building blocks of the academic knowledge production. Most commonly, the distinction between multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary research is made as follows. Multidisciplinary research is considered as a loose collection of distinct disciplinary components, without further efforts for integration between these components. Interdisciplinary research in contrast refers to a more synthetic intent to integrate knowledge from different disciplines, by a more or less integral relationship between knowledge sources (Aram 2004; Bammer 2013; Li and Sakamoto 2015; Edelenbos et al. 2017). Inter- and transdisciplinarity share the common idea of an opening or a...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Anshelm J, Hultman M (2015) Discourses of global climate change. Apocalyptic framing and political antagonism. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Aram JD (2004) Concepts of interdisciplinarity: configurations of knowledge and action. Hum Relat.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726704043893
  3. Ayre M, Nettle R (2015) Doing integration in catchment management research: insights into a dynamic learning process. Environ Sci Policy. Elsevier Ltd 47:18–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bammer G (2013) Disciplining interdisciplinarity. Integration and implementation sciences for researching complex real-world problems. ANU E Press, CanberraCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernstein JH et al (2014) Disciplinarity and trandisciplinarity in the study of knowledge. Inf Sci 17:241–273 Available at: http://academicworks.cuny.edu/kb_pubsGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouwen R, Fry R (1991) Organizational innovation and learning: four patterns of dialog between the dominant logic and the new logic. Int Stud Manag Organ 21(4):37–51Google Scholar
  7. Brugnach M, Craps M, Dewulf A (2014) Including indigenous peoples in climate change mitigation: addressing issues of scale, knowledge and power. Clim Chang (Special Issue on ‘Climate change mitigation and adaptation with local communities and indigenous peoples).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1280-3
  8. Cilliers P, Nicolescu B (2012) Complexity and transdisciplinarity – discontinuity, levels of reality and the hidden third. Futures. Elsevier Ltd 44(8):711–718.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2012.04.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cundill G, Roux DJ, Parker JN (2015) Nurturing communities of practice for transdisciplinary research. Ecol Soc 20(2):22.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07580-200222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Darbellay F (2015) Rethinking inter- and transdisciplinarity: undisciplined knowledge and the emergence of a new thought style. Futures 65:163–174.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.10.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dewulf A et al (2005) How indigenous farmers and university engineers create actionable knowledge for sustainable irrigation. Action Res 3(2):175–192.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750305052141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Edelenbos J, Bressers N, Vandenbussche L (2017) Evolution of interdisciplinary collaboration: what are stimulating conditions? Sci Public Policy 44(July):451–463.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scw035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Flood R, Romm N (1996) Diversity management. Triple loop learning. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gerritsen AL, Stuiver M, Termeer CJAM (2013) Knowledge governance: an exploration of principles, impact, and barriers. Sci Public Policy 40(5):604–615.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gray B (2008) Enhancing transdisciplinary research through collaborative leadership. Am J Prev Med 35(2 Suppl):S124–S132.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.03.037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Klein JT (2015) Reprint of “Discourses of transdisciplinarity: looking back to the future”. Futures. Elsevier Ltd 65:10–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2015.01.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kuhn T (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  18. Lankoski L (2016) Alternative conceptions of sustainability in a business context. J Clean Prod.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.087
  19. Latour B (2013) An inquiry into modes of existence. An anthropology of the moderns. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  20. Lawrence RJ (2015) Advances in transdisciplinarity: epistemologies, methodologies and processes. Futures 65:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li A, Sakamoto M (2015) Hidden scientist network behind environmental management-case study of grassland management in China. Environ Sci Policy. Elsevier Ltd 54:248–253.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.07.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad Manag Rev 22(4):853–886.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1997.9711022105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. O’Brien L, Marzano M, White RM (2013) “Participatory interdisciplinarity”: towards the integration of disciplinary diversity with stakeholder engagement for new models of knowledge production. Sci Public Policy 40(1):51–61.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Peters T, Waterman R (1982) In Search of Excellence. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Pohl C et al (2010) Researchers’ roles in knowledge co-production: experience from sustainability research in Kenya, Switzerland, Bolivia and Nepal. Sci Public Policy 37(4):267–281.  https://doi.org/10.3152/030234210X496628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Polanyi M (1966) Science, faith and society, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  27. .Polk M (2015) Transdisciplinary co-production: designing and testing a transdisciplinary research framework for societal problem solving. Futures. Elsevier Ltd 65:110–122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Popa F, Guillermin M, Dedeurwaerdere T (2015) A pragmatist approach to transdisciplinarity in sustainability research: from complex systems theory to reflexive science. Futures. Elsevier Ltd 65:45–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.02.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Prins S, Craps M, Taillieu T (2005) Boundary dynamics in natural resource management: the ambiguity of stakeholder inclusion. Rev Gouvernance 22Google Scholar
  30. Richardson KA et al (2005) Emergence, complexity and organization: E:CO. ISCE Publishing, MansfieldGoogle Scholar
  31. Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4(2):155–169.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Serrao-Neumann S et al (2015) One human settlement: a transdisciplinary approach to climate change adaptation research. Futures 65:97–109.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.08.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Trencher G et al (2014) Beyond the third mission: exploring the emerging university function of co-creation for sustainability. Sci Public Policy 41(2):151–179.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. van Tulder R (2017) Wicked problems plaza. Principles and practices for effective multi-stakeholder dialogue. Erasmus University/The Partnership Resource Centre, RotterdamGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and Business Management, Centre for Corporate SustainabilityKU LeuvenBrusselsBelgium

Section editors and affiliations

  • Ingrid Molderez
    • 1
  1. 1.KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium