Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education

2019 Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho

Anthropocene and Sustainable Development

  • Leonardo Freire de MelloEmail author
  • Sara Aparecida de Paula
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11352-0_108

Definition

The Anthropocene is the name given to the set of changes and transformations through which the planet Earth has passed during the last century or so and that have reached such a profound magnitude that several scientists and researchers affirm that the planet has entered a new geological era. These transformations can be seen and experienced in processes as the fast and vast urbanization process all over the world, growth in social and economic inequality rates like never seen before, wider and deeper overexploitation and scarcity of natural resources (soil erosion, water pollution, use of oil and other fossil fuels as main energy source by an increasing number of people), ecosystems degradation, and a higher incidence of phenomena like hurricanes, storms, droughts, floods, and high risk natural disasters in general, as well as the extinction of animal and vegetal species in unforeseen speed and proportions. Its comprehension is fundamental to discuss and to plan strategies...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ackerman EA (1959) Population and natural resources. In: Hauser PM, Duncan OD (eds) The study of population. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger WN (2000) Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Prog Hum Geogr 24:347. LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Almeida MO (1972) Economic development and the preservation of environment. In: Development and environment. Mouton, ParisGoogle Scholar
  4. Ames BN, Magaw R, Gold LS (1987) Ranking possible carcinogenic hazards. Science 236:271. New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Artaxo P (2014) Uma nova era geológica em nosso planeta: o Antropoceno? (103):13–24. Universidade de São Paulo Sistema Integrado de Bibliotecas – SIBiUSP.  https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9036.v0i103p13-24
  6. Bankoff G, Frerks G, Hilhorst D (2004) (Org) Mapping vulnerability: disasters, development & people. Earthscan, LondresGoogle Scholar
  7. Bates M (1969) The human ecosystem. In: National Academy of Sciences, Committee on Resources and Man. Resources and man. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  8. Beck U (1992) Risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage, LondresGoogle Scholar
  9. Boserup E (1965) The conditions of agricultural growth: the economics of agrarian change under population pressure. G. Allen and Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Boserup E (1981) Population and technological change: a study of long-term trends. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown LR (1981) Building a sustainable society. W. W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown H, Hutchings E (1972) Are our descendants doomed: technological change and population growth. Viking Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown L, Gardner G, Halweil B (1999) Beyond Malthus: nineteen dimensions of the population challenge. W. W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Buttel FH, Kenney M, Kloppenburg J Jr (1985) From green revolution to biorevolution: some observations on the changing technological bases of economic transformation in the third world. Econ Dev Cult Chang 34:31. ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Campbell RR, Wade JL (1972) Society and environmental: the coming collision. Allyn and Bacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  16. Carson R (1962) Silent spring. Houghton Miflin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Crenson MA (1971) The un-politics of air pollution: a study of non-decisionmaking in the cities. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Crutzen PJ (2002) Geology of mankind. Nature 415(6867):23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crutzen PJ (2006) The “Anthropocene”. In: Ehlers E, Krafft T (eds) Earth system science in the Anthropocene. Springer, Berlin/HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  20. Cutter SL (1996) Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Prog Hum Geogr 20:529. LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cutter SL, Emrich CT (2006) Moral Hazard, Social Catastrophe: The Changing Face of Vulnerability along the Hurricane Coasts. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 604:102–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84:242. AustinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cutter SL et al (2006) The long road home: race, class, and recovery from Hurricane Katrina. Environment 48:8. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  24. Evans DM (2018) What is consumption, where has it been going, and does it still matter? Sociol Rev 1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026118764028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Galtung J (1979) Development, environment and technology: towards a technology for self-reliance. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Galtung J (1986) The green movement: a socio-historical exploration. Int Sociol 1:75. LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Giddens A (2009) The politics of climate change. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Janssen MA, Ostrom E (2006) Resilience, vulnerability, and adaptation: A cross-cutting theme of the International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change. Global Environmental Change 16:237–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jones D (1993) Environmental hazards in the 1990s: problems, paradigms and prospects. Geography 78(2):161–165Google Scholar
  30. Kate RW (2000) Population and consumption: what we know, what we need to know. Environment 42:10. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  31. Keyfitz N (1976) World resources and the world middle class. Sci Am 235:28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Latour B (2014) Telling friends from foes in the time of the Anthropocene. In: Hamilton C, Christophe B, François G (eds) The Anthropocene and the global environment crisis – rethinking modernity in a new epoch. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Malthus TR (1998) An essay on the principle of population. Electronic Scholarly Publishing Project, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. McPhee J (1989) The control of nature. Farrar, Straus & 825 Giroux, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Meadows DL et al (1972) The limits to growth. The Club of Rome report. Universe Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Ophuls W (1977) Ecology and the politics of scarcity. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  37. Osborn F (1953) The limits of the earth. Little Brown, BostonGoogle Scholar
  38. Sachs I (1970) Development planning and environment: the case of the countries of the third world. Soc Sci Inf 9:17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sachs I (1972) Environmental quality management and development planning: some suggestions for action. In: Development and environment, 1972. (Report and working papers of a panel of experts convened by the Secretary-General of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, Founex, Switzerland)Google Scholar
  40. Sachs I (1980) Stratégies de i’ecodéveloppement. Les Èditions Ouvrières, ParisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sachs I (1981) Initiation à L’écodéveloppement. Privat, ToulouseGoogle Scholar
  42. Sachs I (1993) Estratégias de Transição para o Século XXI: desenvolvimento e meio ambiente. Studio Nobel/Fundação do Desenvolvimento Administrativo, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  43. Sánchez L, Croal P (2012) Environmental impact assessment, from Rio-92 to Rio+20 and beyond. Ambiente Soc 15:41. São PauloCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schnaiberg A, Watts N (1980) The environment: from surplus to scarcity. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Schnaiberg A, Watts N (1986) Distributional conflicts in environmental resources policy. St. Martin’s Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Steffen W, Crutzen PJ, McNeill JR (2007) The Anthropocene: are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature? R Swed Acad Sci 36(8): 614–621Google Scholar
  47. Tolba MK (1982) Development without destruction: evolving environmental perceptions. Tycooly International Publishing, DublinGoogle Scholar
  48. Tucker W (1982) The environmental era. Public Opin 5:41Google Scholar
  49. United Nations Environment Programme (1981a) An environmental bibliography. UNEP, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  50. United Nations Environment Programme (1981b) In defence of the earth: the basic texts on environment, Founex, Stockholm, Cocoyoc. UNEP, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  51. United Nations Environment Programme (1986) 1986: The state of the environment (Environment and health). UNEP, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  52. United Nations Environment Programme (1987) Our common future, Chapter 2: towards sustainable development. United Nations: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  53. Vilches A, Praia J, Gil-Pérez D (2008) O Antropoceno: Entre o risco e a oportunidade. Educação Temas Probl 5:41–66Google Scholar
  54. United Nations (2015) Millennium Development Goals. http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/. Accessed 16 October 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leonardo Freire de Mello
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sara Aparecida de Paula
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Engineering, Modelling and Applied Social Sciences, Territorial Planning DepartmentFederal University of ABCSão Bernardo do CampoBrazil
  2. 2.Centre for Engineering, Modelling and Applied Social Sciences, Master’s Candidate on the Programme of International Political EconomyFederal University of ABCSão Bernardo do CampoBrazil

Section editors and affiliations

  • Tamara Savelyeva
    • 1
  1. 1.The Education University of Hong KongHong KongChina