Advertisement

Nanocellulose for Sustainable Future Applications

  • Ihsan Flayyih Hasan AI-JawhariEmail author
Living reference work entry
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

In this chapter is a review of several researches on the development and characterization of cellulose. The discussion will focus on structural, mechanical, and cellulose degradation. Nanocellulose is lightweight and has renewability, availability, low cost, and, most importantly, minimum environmental impact (eco-friendly) and little effect on animals and human health. General properties of cellulose include extensive chemical modification capability and very high aspect ratio leading to the formation of versatile semicrystalline fibers which is the unique characteristic of nanomaterials as reinforcing agents. There is a strong and complex network of hydrogen bonds that are stabilized by the ordered regions of cellulose chain packages. It resembles nanocrystalline rods. There are two main types of nanocellulose: (i) nanocrystalline and (ii) microfibrillated cellulose. Different types of plants are the main sources of cellulose, but some sea animals such as tunicates and algae are capable of producing cellulose fibers. Another type of nanocellulose is also known as bacterial cellulose. Specific bacteria mainly Gluconacetobacter strains secrete these nanofibers extra-cellularly. Because of their special fibrillary nanostructure, these bacteria have exceptional mechanical and physical properties. Its properties include high strength crystallinity and high elastic module. Bacterial cellulose is currently the subject of research in several fields of application, reinforcement in nanocomposites, biomedical applications, and fuel cell membranes.

Keywords

Nanocellulose Bacterial cellulose Environment Biodegradable Renewability 

References

  1. 1.
    Abdul Khalil HPS, Davoudpour Y, Islam MN et al (2014) Production and modification of nanofibrillated cellulose using various mechanical processes: a review. Carbohydr Polym 99:649–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Czaja W, Romanovicz D, Brown RM (2004) Structural investigations of microbial cellulose produces in sattionary and agitated culture. Cellulose 11:403–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Evans BR, O’Neill HM, Malyvanh VP, Lee I, Woodward J (2003) Palladium bacterial cellulose membranes for fuel cells. Biosens Bioelectron 18:917–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    George J, Ramana KV, Sabapathy SN, Bawa AS (2005a) Physico-mechanical properties of chemically treated bacterial (Acetobacter xylinum) cellulose membrane. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 21(8–9):1323–1327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    George J, Ramana KV, Sabapathy SN, Jagannath JH, Bawa AS (2005b) Characterization of chemically treated bacterial (Acetobacter xylinum) biopolymer: some thermo-mechanical properties. Int J Biol Macromol 37(4):189–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guhados G, Wan WK, Hutter JL (2005) Measurement of the elastic modulus of single cellulose fibers using atomic force microscopy. Langmuir 21:6642–6646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Habibi Y, Lucia LA, Rojas OJ (2010) Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. Chem Rev 110:3479–3500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hokkanen S, Repo E, Sillanpää M (2013) Removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions by succinic anhydride modified mercerized nanocellulose. Chem Eng J 223:40–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hokkanen S, Repo E, Suopajärvi T et al (2014) Adsorption of Ni(II), Cu(II) and Cd(II) from aqueous solutions by amino modified nanostructured microfibrillated cellulose. Cellulose 21:1471–1487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Iwamoto S, Kai W, Isogai A, Iwata T (2009) Elastic Modulus of single cellulose microfibrils from tunicate measured by atomic force microscopy. Biomacromolecules 10:2571–2576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jin L, Wei Y, Xu Q et al (2014) Cellulose nanofibers prepared from TEMPO-oxidation of kraft pulp and its flocculation effect on kaolin clay. J Appl Polym Sci 131:1–8Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jin L, Li W, Xu Q, Sun Q (2015) Amino-functionalized nanocrystalline cellulose as an adsorbent for anionic dyes. Cellulose 22:2443–2456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jonas R, Farah LF (1998) Production and application of microbial cellulose. Polym Degrad Stab 59:101–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Juntaro J, Pommet M, Kalinka G, Mantalaris A, Shaffer MSP, Bismarck A (2008) Creating hierarchical structures in renewable composites by attaching bacterial cellulose onto sisal fibers. Adv Mater 20:3122–3126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kardam A, Raj KR, Srivastava S, Srivastava MM (2014) Nanocellulose fibers for biosorption of cadmium, nickel, and lead ions from aqueous solution. Clean Techn Environ Policy 16:385–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim U-J, Kuga S (2001) Ion-exchange chromatography by dicarboxyl cellulose gel. J Chromatogr A 919:29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Klemm D, Schumann D, Kramer F, Hesler N, Koth D, Sultanova B (2009) Nanocellulose materials – different cellulose, different functionality. Macromol Symp 280:60–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S et al (2011) Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:5438–5466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lavoine N, Desloges I, Dufresne A, Bras J (2012) Microfibrillated cellulose – its barrier properties and applications in cellulosic materials: a review. Carbohydr Polym 90:735–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liimatainen H, Sirviö J, Sundman O et al (2012a) Use of nanoparticular and soluble anionic celluloses in coagulation-flocculation treatment of kaolin suspension. Water Res 46:2159–2166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liimatainen H, Visanko M, Sirviö JA et al (2012b) Enhancement of the nanofibrillation of wood cellulose through sequential periodate–chlorite oxidation. Biomacromolecules 13:1592–1597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40(7):3941–3994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nakagaito AN, Yano H (2004) The effect of morphological changes from pulp fiber towards nano-scale fibrillated cellulose on the mechanical properties of high-strength plant fiber based composites. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 78:547–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nogi M, Yano H (2008) Transparent nanocomposites based on cellulose produced by bacteria offer potential innovation in the electronics device industry. Adv Mater 20:1849–1852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    O’Sullivan AC (1997) Cellulose: the structure slowly unravels. Cellulose 4(3):173–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rajalaxmi D, Jiang N, Leslie G, Ragauskas AJ (2010) Synthesis of novel water-soluble sulfonated cellulose. Carbohydr Res 345:284–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ruiz-Palomero C, Soriano ML, Valcárcel M (2016) Sulfonated nanocellulose for the efficient dispersive micro solid-phase extraction and determination of silver nanoparticles in food products. J Chromatogr A 1428:352–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Saito T, Isogai A (2005) Ion-exchange behavior of carboxylate groups in fibrous cellulose oxidized by the TEMPO-mediated system. Carbohydr Polym 61:183–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Singha AS, Thakur VK (2009) Chemical resistance, mechanical and physical properties of biofibers-based polymer composites. Polym Plast Technol Eng 48:736–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Siqueira G, Bras J, Dufresne A (2010) Cellulosic bionanocomposites: a review of preparation, properties and applications. Polymers 2:728–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Siro I, Plackett D (2010) Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review. Cellulose 17:459–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sirviö J, Honka A, Liimatainen H et al (2011) Synthesis of highly cationic water-soluble cellulose derivative and its potential as novel biopolymeric flocculation agent. Carbohydr Polym 86:266–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Thakur VK, Vennerberg D, Madbouly SA, Kessler MR (2014) Bio-inspired green surface functionalization of PMMA for multifunctional capacitors. RSC Adv 4:6677–6684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yu X, Tong S, Ge M et al (2013) Adsorption of heavy metal ions from aqueous solution by carboxylated cellulose nanocrystals. J Environ Sci 25:933–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zimmermann T, Pöhler E, Geiger T (2004) Cellulose fibrils for polymer reinforcement. Adv Eng Mater 6:754–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biology, College of Education for Pure SciencesUniversity of ThiqarAL-NasiriyaIraq

Personalised recommendations