Encyclopedia of Solid Earth Geophysics

Living Edition
| Editors: Harsh K. Gupta

Vertical Seismic Profiling

  • James W. RectorIIIEmail author
  • Maria-Daphne Mangriotis
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10475-7_168-1
  • 2 Downloads

Synonyms

VSP

Definition

Vertical seismic profiling A geophysical technology for measuring the seismic properties in a profile of the earth using a set of sources and receivers, either of which is placed along the depth (vertical) axis.

Introduction

Vertical seismic profiling (commonly abbreviated to the name VSP) is a major technique in geophysical exploration, which involves measuring downgoing and upgoing seismic wavefields through a stratigraphic sequence. Shortly after the first attempts of developing surface reflection seismology, where both sources and receivers were at the surface, the line of research sets out with the idea of burying either sources or receivers in boreholes. McCollum and LaRue (1931) proposed that local geologic structure could be determined from measuring the arrival of seismic energy from surface sources with buried receivers. This geometry forms the basic principle of determining seismic wave propagation velocities from VSP measurements even today. The...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Al-Harrasi OH, Kendall J-M, Chapman M (2011) Fracture characterization using frequency-dependent shear wave anisotropy analysis. Geophys J Int 185:1059–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Byerley G, Monk D, Aaron P, Yates M (2018) Time-lapse seismic monitoring of individual hydraulic frac stages using a downhole DAS array. Lead Edge 37(11):802–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Guo B, Yu J, Huang Y, Schuster GT (2015) Benefits and limitations of imaging multiples: interferometric and resonant migration. Lead Edge 34(7):802–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hanafy SM, Huang Y, Schuster GT (2015) Benefits and limitations of imaging multiples: mirror migration. Lead Edge 34(7):796–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hunziker J, Greenwood A, Minato S, Barbosa N, Caspari E, Hollinger K (2019) Bayesian full-waveform tube-wave inversion for effective hydraulic fracture aperture and mechanical fracture compliance. EAGE 81st Conference and ExhibitionGoogle Scholar
  6. Kiraz MS, Nowack RL (2018) Marchenko redatuming and imaging with application to the Frio carbon sequestration experiment. Geophys J Int 215:1633–1643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Liang L, Li M, Rufino R, Abubakar L, Nutt H, Menkiti H, Dummong S, Tondel R (2013) Application of frequency-domain full-waveform inversion for time-lapse 3D VSP data interpretation. Soc Explor Geophysicists Expanded Abstr 32:5107–5112Google Scholar
  8. Marhfoul BE, Verschuur E (2017) Joint Migration Inversion of 3D full wavefield borehole data. EAGE 79th Conference and ExhibitionGoogle Scholar
  9. McCollum B, LaRue WW (1931) Utilization of existing wells in seismograph work. Early Geophys Pap 1:119–127Google Scholar
  10. Tan Y, Chai C, Engelder T (2014) Use of S-wave attenuation from perforation shots to map the growth of the stimulated reservoir volume in the Marcellus gas shale. Lead Edge 33:1090–1096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wu Z, Rector JW, Nihei K, McCallen D (2017) Characterizing seismic soil and unconsolidated sediment using Mach waves. Soc Explor Geophysicists Expanded Abstr:2710–2714Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of California at BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.School of Geosciences and Grant Institute of Earth ScienceUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
  3. 3.Institute of GeoEnergy EngineeringHeriot-Watt UniversityEdinburghUK