Advertisement

Public Sector Values in a Privatizing State

  • Richard MulganEmail author
Living reference work entry
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

Increased reliance on private-sector organizations to provide public goods and services has brought public servants into greater contact with nongovernment actors and shone a spotlight on ethical differences between the public sector and the private sector, particularly the for-profit sector. Though both public and private sectors share certain organizational values such as efficiency and effectiveness, the public sector is uniquely committed to upholding values central to liberal-democratic government, including impartiality and accountability, while the commercial private sector places more emphasis on profitability and innovation. Public servants therefore need to be aware of how tensions between these competing value-sets may compromise core government values. For example, the public sector is subject to a much greater range of reporting and scrutinizing mechanisms which means that outsourcing runs the risk of seriously reducing levels of accountability and transparency. Contractors may need to allow access to public accountability agencies such as government auditors and ombudsmen. Public servants, in turn, should be wary of adopting private-sector protections, such as “commercial-in-confidence,” as a pretext for excessive secrecy. The public-sector value of impartiality is also under potential threat from legitimate private-sector conventions of doing favors for friends and relations. When applied to the public sector, these translate into corrupt practices of cronyism and nepotism. Private contractors exercising professional discretion when delivering complex services to the public need to be guided by the same general concern for the public interest as public employees. This may require including adherence to public-sector values as part of the contract or relying on contractors from the nonprofit sector who already subscribe to these values.

Keywords

Accountability Codes of conduct Corruption Impartiality Outsourcing Privatization Public interest Public-private partnerships (PPPs) Public-sector ethics Transparency 

References

  1. Adams, G.B., and D.L. Balfour. 2010. Market-based government and the decline of organizational ethics. Administration and Society 42 (6): 615–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alam, Q., M.H. Kabir, and V. Chaudhri. 2014. Managing infrastructure projects in Australia: A shift from a contractual to a collaborative public management strategy. Administration and Society 46 (4): 422–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alford, J., and J. O’Flynn. 2012. Rethinking public service delivery. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Committee of Public Accounts. 2014. Transforming contract management. House of Commons, United Kingdom Parliament. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201415/cmselect/cmpubacc/585/585.pdf. Accessed 5 Aug 2019.
  5. Considine, M., and J. Lewis. 2003. Networks and interactivity: Making sense of front-line governance in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Australia. Journal of European Public Policy 10 (1): 46–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dobel, J.P. 2005. Public management as ethics. In The Oxford handbook of public management, eds. E. Ferlie, L.E. Lynn and C. Pollitt, 156–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Hupe, P., and M. Hill. 2007. Street-level bureaucracy and public accountability. Public Administration 85 (2): 279–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Industry Commission. 1996. Competitive tendering and contracting out by public sector agencies. Melbourne: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
  9. Mulgan, R. 2003. Holding power to account. Accountability in modern democracies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ———. 2005. Outsourcing and public service values: The Australian experience. International Review of Administrative Sciences 71 (1): 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ———. 2015. Transparency and the performance of outsourced government services. Canberra: Australia and New Zealand School of Government.Google Scholar
  12. OECD (Organisation for Economic and Social Development). 2000. Trust in government. In Ethics measures in OECD countries. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 2009. Revolving doors, accountability and transparency. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  14. van der Wal, Z., G. de Graaf, and K. Lasthuizen. 2008. What’s valued most? Similarities and differences between the organizational values of the public and private sector. Public Administration 86 (2): 465–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Crawford School of Public PolicyAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Helen Sullivan
    • 1
  1. 1.Crawford School of Public PolicyAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations