Advertisement

Using Private Regulation for the Public Good

  • Flavia DonadelliEmail author
  • Kira Matus
Living reference work entry
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

Regulations by non-state organizations are a well-established tool of contemporary global governance. While they are not directly initiated or promoted by governments, private governance mechanisms are promising tools for the promotion of the traditional goals of public administration. Their overall potential to promote the public good has, however, been contested in the recent literature. Some scholars have been decisive in emphasizing the potentially negative consequences of relying on non-state regulation in the absence of robust public institutions and relatively consensual public regulatory environments. This chapter engages with and advances this debate by asserting that there is still a large potential for non-state regulations to independently promote the public good and even contribute to the enhancement of governments’ effectiveness in contexts of low state capacity. It highlights four ways in which private regulation has been found to promote the public good: (1) by promoting regulatory innovation that serves as pilots or “enzymes” for larger-scale public regulatory changes, (2) by channelling positive incentives from international markets to local producers, (3) by directly providing enforcement capacity and monitoring tools to low-capacity states, and finally (4) as mechanisms that help in the production and sharing of knowledge and best practices around the world.

Keywords

Private regulation Public good Governance Administrative capacity 

References

  1. Abbott, Kenneth W., David Levi-Faur, and Duncan Snidal. 2017. Introducing regulatory intermediaries. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 670: 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayres, I., and J. Braithwaite. 1992. Responsive regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bartley, Tim. 2011. Transnational governance as the layering of rules: Intersections of public and private standards. Theoretical Inquiries in Law 12 (2): 517.  https://doi.org/10.2202/1565-3404.1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett, Elizabeth A. 2017. Who governs socially-oriented voluntary sustainability standards? Not the producers of certified products. World Development 91 (March): 53–69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.10.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernstein, Steven, and Benjamin Cashore. 2012. Complex global governance and domestic policies: Four pathways of influence. International Affairs 88 (3): 585–604.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01090.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Black, J. 2001. Decentring regulation: The role of regulation and self regulation in a “post-regulatory” world. Current Legal Problems 54: 103–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blaser, J., Sarre, A., Poore, D. & Johnson, S. 2011. Status of tropical forest management 2011. ITTO Technical Series No 38. International Tropical Timber Organization, Yokohama, Japan.Google Scholar
  8. Bolivia. 1996. Ley Forestal 1700. https://www.cfb.org.bo/bolivia-forestal/ley-forestal-1700. Accessed Feb 2019.
  9. Borck, Jonathan C., and Cary Coglianese. 2009. Voluntary environmental programs: Assessing their effectiveness. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 34 (1): 305–324.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.032908.091450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bray, David Barton, Jose Luís Plaza Sánchez, and Ellen Contreras Murphy. 2002. Social dimensions of organic coffee production in Mexico: Lessons for eco-labeling initiatives. Society & Natural Resources 15 (5): 429–446.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920252866783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cidell, Julie. 2015. Performing leadership: Municipal green building policies and the city as role model. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 33: 566–579.  https://doi.org/10.1068/c12181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark, A., et al. 2011. Promoting sustainability in the value chain of natural bisabolol: A Brazilian rainforest product. New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
  13. Delmas, M., and A. Terlaak. 2001. A framework for analyzing environmental voluntary agreements. California Management Review 43 (3): 44–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Donadelli, F. 2012. Motivações e resultados da certificação florestal: um estudo de caso cadeia de valor da Candeia. Ambiente & Sociedade 15 (3): 97–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Drigo, I. 2010. As barreiras para a implantação de concessões florestais na América do Sul: os casos de Bolívia e Brasil. Unpublished thesis (PhD), Universidade de São Paulo/AgroParisTech.Google Scholar
  16. Espinoza, O., and M.J. Dockry. 2014. Forest certification in Bolivia: A status report and analysis of stakeholder perspectives. Forest Products Journal 64 (3–4): 80–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Getz, Christy, and Aimee Shreck. 2006. What Organic and Fair Trade labels do not tell us: Towards a place-based understanding of certification. International Journal of Consumer Studies 30 (5): 490–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gunningham, N. 1995. Environment, self-regulation, and the chemical industry: Assessing responsible care. Law & Policy 17: 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gunningham, N., and J. Rees. 1997. Industry self regulation: An institutional perspective. Law & Policy 19 (4): 363–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jack, D. 1999. La certificación y el manejo forestal sostenible em Bolivia. Technical Document 79/1999. Proyecto BOLFOR, USAID/Bolivia.Google Scholar
  21. Jaffee, Daniel. 2014. Brewing justice: Fair trade coffee, sustainability, and survival. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  22. James, Philip, Lilian Miles, Richard Croucher, and Mark Houssart. 2018. Regulating factory safety in the Bangladesh garment industry: Garment industry safety in Bangladesh. Regulation & Governance.  https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12183.
  23. Kontokosta, C.E. 2011. Greening the regulatory landscape: The spatial and temporal diffusion of green building policies in US cities. The Journal of Sustainable Real Estate 3 (1): 68–90.Google Scholar
  24. Lambin, Eric F., and Tannis Thorlakson. 2018. Sustainability standards: Interactions between private actors, civil society, and governments. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 43 (1): 369–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lambin, Eric F., Patrick Meyfroidt, Ximena Rueda, Allen Blackman, Jan Börner, Paolo Omar Cerutti, Thomas Dietsch, et al. 2014. Effectiveness and synergies of policy instruments for land use governance in tropical regions. Global Environmental Change 28: 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Levi-Faur, D. 2005. The global diffusion of regulatory capitalism. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 598: 12–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lin, Li-Wen. 2010. Corporate social responsibility in China: Window dressing or structural change. Berkeley Journal of International Law 28 (1): 64–100.Google Scholar
  28. Linhares, C. 2011. A sustentabilidade no manejo da candeia é investigada em pesquisa do IRI. Aun-USP 44 (6). http://www.usp.br/aun/antigo/exibir?id=4101&ed=680&f=66. Accessed Feb 2019.
  29. Matus, Kira J.M. 2010. Standardization, certification, and labeling: A background paper for the roundtable on sustainability workshop January 19–21, 2009. In Certifiably sustainable?: The role of third-party certification systems: Report of a workshop, 79–104. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  30. Olson, M. 1965. The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
  31. Pattberg, P. 2005. What role for private rule-making in global environmental governance? Analysing the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). International Environmental Agreements 5: 175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. ———. 2006. Private governance and the South: Lessons from global forest politics. Third World Quarterly 27 (4): 579–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. ———. 2007. Private institutions and global governance: The new politics of environmental sustainability. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Peltzman, S. 1976. Toward a more general theory of regulation. Journal of Law and Economics 19: 211–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Quevedo, L. 2004. Forest certification in Bolivia. Paper presented at the Forest certification in developing and transitioning societies: Social, economic, and ecological effects, New Haven.Google Scholar
  36. ———. n.d. Forest certification in Bolivia. Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, pp 303–336. http://www.yale.edu/forestcertification/symposium/pdfs/bolivia_symposium.pdf. Accessed Feb 2019.
  37. Ribeiro Jr., A. 27/02/2000. Rede Clandestina Devasta Madeiras de Minas. O Globo.Google Scholar
  38. Rosenau, J.N. 2000. Governança, ordem e transformação na política mundial. In Governança sem governo: ordem e transformação na política mundial, ed. James N. Rosenau and Ernst-Otto Czempiel, 11–46. Brasília: UNB.Google Scholar
  39. Schindler, S.B. 2010. Following industry’s LEED: Municipal adoption of private green building standards. Florida Law Review 62: 285.Google Scholar
  40. Short, J. 2013. Self-regulation in the regulatory void. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 649 (1): 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Solomon, J. 2008. Law and governance in the 21st century regulatory state. Texas Law Review 86: 819–856.Google Scholar
  42. Stigler, G. 1971. The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2 (3): 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Teyber, Edward. 2014. Incorporating third party green building rating systems into municipal building and zoning codes. Pace Environmental Law Review 31 (3): 832–855.Google Scholar
  44. van der Heijden, Jeroen. 2012. Voluntary environmental governance arrangements. Environmental Policy 21 (3): 486–509.Google Scholar
  45. ———. 2015. On the potential of voluntary environmental programmes for the built environment: A critical analysis of LEED. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 30 (4): 553–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. ———. 2017. Brighter and darker sides of intermediation: Target-oriented and self-interested intermediaries in the regulatory governance of buildings. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 670 (1): 207–224.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716217693583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vogel, David. 2010. The private regulation of global corporate conduct: Achievements and limitations. Business & Society 49 (1): 68–87.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650309343407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Walker, C.K. 2016. Neoliberalism and the reform of regulation policy in the Australian trucking sector: Policy innovation or a repeat of known pitfalls? Policy Studies 37 (1): 72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of GovernmentVictoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand
  2. 2.Division of Public Policy, Division of Environment and Sustainability, and Division of Social ScienceHong Kong University of Science and TechnologyHong KongHong Kong

Section editors and affiliations

  • Jeroen van der Heijden
    • 1
  1. 1.School of GovernmentVictoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations