Advertisement

Accountability in the Context of Private Policy Implementation

  • Lien NguyenEmail author
  • Pragati Rawat
  • John C. Morris
Living reference work entry
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

Accountability is a complex term to define, covering various ideals of efficiency and effectiveness against which public managers are assessed. Furthermore, the concept is always evolving: gauging and ensuring public servants are accountable to multiple, and often competing norms is a challenging process. Privatization has gained popularity as a solution to the perceived ineffectiveness of the government. Ironically, the involvement of the private sector in implementing public policies also draws attention to the complexities of accountability. This chapter explores the academic literature of these crosscutting issues. The findings are organized into three parts: (1) an overview of privatization, (2) accountability issues in the context of privatization, and (3) recommendations for public institutions/administrators to handle accountability issues. Three types of accountability issues are identified: blurred accountability, goal conflict, and monitoring. To ensure nongovernmental providers satisfy the public’s preferences, public authorities have to be active players in these processes instead of passive bystanders, that is, players who equip themselves with expertise and capacity in public management and maintain an ongoing dialogue with nongovernmental partners.

Keywords

Privatization Extended accountability Accountability issues Blurring accountability Conflicting accountability Monitoring issues 

References

  1. Acar, M., C. Guo, and K. Yang. 2008. Accountability when hierarchical authority is absent: Views from public-private partnership practitioners. The American Review of Public Administration 38 (1): 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amirkhanyan, A.A. 2011. What is the effect of performance measurement on perceived accountability effectiveness in state and local government contracts? Public Performance & Management Review 35 (2): 303–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Athias, L. 2013. Local public-services provision under public–private partnerships: Contractual design and contracting parties incentives. Local Government Studies 39 (3): 312–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldino, D., M. Drum, and B. Wyatt. 2010. The privatization of prisoner transfer services in western Australia. What can we learn from the Ward case? Australian Journal of Public Administration 69 (4): 418–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnekov, T.K., and J.A. Raffel. 1990. Public management of privatization. Public Productivity & Management Review 14: 135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benish, A. 2014. The public accountability of privatized activation – The case of Israel. Social Policy and Administration 48 (2): 262–277.  https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benish, A., and D. Levi-Faur. 2012. New forms of administrative law in the age of third-party government. Public Administration 90 (4): 886–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bergsteiner, H., and G.C. Avery. 2008. A generic multiple constituency matrix: Accountability in private prisons. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19 (3): 631–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bertelli, A.M., and C.R. Smith. 2009. Relational contracting and network management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20 (suppl_1): i21–i40.Google Scholar
  10. Bevir, M. 2011. Governance and governmentality after neoliberalism. Policy & Politics 39 (4): 457–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bovens, M. 2005. 8.1 The concept of public accountability. In The Oxford handbook of public management, 182–208. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2007. Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal 13 (4): 447–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ———. 2010. Two concepts of accountability: Accountability as a virtue and as a mechanism. West European Politics 33 (5): 946–967.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2010.486119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bovens, M., T. Schillemans, and P.T. Hart. 2008. Does public accountability work? An assessment tool. Public Administration 86 (1): 225–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bovens, M., R.E. Goodin, and T. Schillemans. 2014. The Oxford handbook public accountability. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Breaux, D.A., C.M. Duncan, C.D. Keller, and J.C. Morris. 2002. Welfare reform, Mississippi style: Temporary assistance for needy families and the search for accountability. Public Administration Review 62 (1): 92–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brodkin, E.Z. 2011. Policy work: Street-level organizations under new managerialism. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21 (suppl_2): i253–i277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brown, K.N. 2013. We the people, constitutional accountability, and outsourcing government. Industrial Law Journal 88 (4): 1347–1403.Google Scholar
  19. Butler, S.M. 1986. Privatizing federal services: A primer. Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation.Google Scholar
  20. Carboni, J. 2015. Governance and contracting. In Government contracting: A public solutions handbook, 137–147. New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  21. Chin, R. 2013. Prison privatization and why transparency matters to public administrators. From PA Times. http://www.afscmeinfocenter.org/privatizationupdate/2013/03/prison-privatization-and-why-transparency-matters-to-public-administrators.htm#.XV-naehKiUl.
  22. Chrystal, K.A., and R. G. Lipsey. 1997. Economics for business and management. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Considine, M. 2002. The end of the line? Accountable governance in the age of networks, partnerships, and joined-up services. Governance 15 (1): 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Donaldson, L. 1990. The ethereal hand: Organizational economics and management theory. Academy of Management Review 15 (3): 369–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dubnick, M. 2005. Accountability and the promise of performance: In search of the mechanisms. Public Performance & Management Review 28 (3): 376–417.Google Scholar
  26. Dubnick, M.J. 2007. Sarbanes-Oxley and the search for accountable corporate governance. GovNet eJournal 1 (2): 140–172.Google Scholar
  27. Dubnick, M.J., and H.G. Frederickson. 2014a. Accountable governance: Problems and promises. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. ———. 2014b. The challenge of multiple accountability: Does redundancy lead to overload? In Accountable governance, ed. Thomas Schillemans and Mark Bovens, 35–53. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. ———. 2014c. The tangled web of accountability in contracting networks: The case of welfare reform. In Accountable Governance, ed. Barbara S. Romzek, 54–73. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. EssaysUK. 2018, November. Relational contracts: Advantages and disadvantages. Retrieved from https://www.ukessays.com/essays/economics/relational-contract.php?vref=1
  31. Forrer, J., J.E. Kee, K.E. Newcomer, and E. Boyer. 2010. Public-private partnerships and the public accountability question. Public Administration Review 70 (3): 475–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Frederickson, H.G. 1996. Comparing the reinventing government movement with the new public administration. Public Administration Review 56 (3): 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gilman, M.E. 2001. Legal accountability in an era of privatized welfare. California Law Review 89: 569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Girth, A.M. 2012. A closer look at contract accountability: Exploring the determinants of sanctions for unsatisfactory contract performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24 (2): 317–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Grossi, G., and A. Thomasson. 2015. Bridging the accountability gap in hybrid organizations: The case of Copenhagen Malmö Port. International Review of Administrative Sciences 81 (3): 604–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hansson, L., and F. Longva. 2014. Contracting accountability in network governance structures. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management 11 (2): 92–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Heilman, J.G., and G.W. Johnson. 1992. The politics and economics of privatization: The case of wastewater treatment. Tuscaloosa: University Alabama Press.Google Scholar
  38. Isaksson, D., P. Blomqvist, and U. Winblad. 2018. Privatization of social care delivery–how can contracts be specified? Public Management Review 20 (11): 1643–1662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jantz, B., T. Klenk, F. Larsen, and J. Wiggan. 2018. Marketization and varieties of accountability relationships in employment services: Comparing Denmark, Germany, and Great Britain. Administration and Society 50 (3): 321–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Johnson, G.W., and D.J. Watson. 1991. Privatization: Provision or production of services? Two case studies. State & Local Government Review 23: 82–89.Google Scholar
  41. Johnston, J.M., and B.S. Romzek. 1999. Contracting and accountability in state Medicaid reform: Rhetoric, theories, and reality. Public Administration Review 59: 383–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kearns, K.P. 1994. The strategic management of accountability in nonprofit organizations: An analytical framework. Public Administration Review 54: 185–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. ———. 1998. Institutional accountability in higher education: A strategic approach. Public Productivity & Management Review 22: 140–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kettl, D.F. 1993. Sharing power: Public governance and private markets. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  45. ———. 2015. The job of government: Interweaving public functions and private hands. Public Administration Review 75 (2): 219–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Klingner, D.E., J. Nalbandian, and B.S. Romzek. 2002. Politics, administration, and markets: Conflicting expectations and accountability. The American Review of Public Administration 32 (2): 117–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Knill, C., and D. Lehmkuhl. 2002. Private actors and the state: Internationalization and changing patterns of governance. Governance 15 (1): 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kolderie, T. 1986. The two different concepts of privatization. Public Administration Review 46: 285–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Koppell, J.G. 2005. Pathologies of accountability: ICANN and the challenge of “multiple accountabilities disorder”. Public Administration Review 65 (1): 94–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lerner, J.S., and P.E. Tetlock. 1999. Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin 125 (2): 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Levin, J., and S. Tadelis. 2010. Contracting for government services: Theory and evidence from US cities. The Journal of Industrial Economics 58 (3): 507–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lipsky, M., and S.R. Smith. 1993. Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Lopez-de-Silane, F., A. Shleifer, and R.W. Vishny. 1995. Privatization in the united states (No. w5113). National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/papers/w5113.pdf
  54. Martin, M.H., and A. Halachmi. 2012. Public-private partnerships in global health: Addressing issues of public accountability, risk management and governance. Public Administration Quarterly 36: 189–237.Google Scholar
  55. Milward, H.B., and K.G. Provan. 2000. Governing the hollow state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10 (2): 359–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Morris, J.C. 1997. Prison privatization in Mississippi: Government failure, market failure, or both. In annual meetings of the Southeastern Conference on Public Administration, September (pp. 24–26).Google Scholar
  57. Morris, J.C. 2007. Government and market pathologies of privatization: The case of prison privatization. Politics & Policy 35 (2): 318–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mulgan, R. 2000. ‘Accountability’: An ever-expanding concept? Public Administration 78 (3): 555–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. ———. 2006. Government accountability for outsourced services. Australian Journal of Public Administration 65 (2): 48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. O’Toole, L.J., Jr. 2000. Different public managements? Implications of structural context in hierarchies and networks. In Advancing public management: New developments in theory, methods, and practice, 19–32. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Osborne, D., and T. Gaebler. 1992. Reinventing Government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector from schoolhouse to statehouse. City Hall to Pentagon. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  62. Palatiello, J., and A. Stuart. 2017. Annual privatization report 2017: Federal Government Privatization. https://reason.org/wp-content/uploads/files/annual_privatization_report_2017_federal_privatization.pdf
  63. Papadopoulos, Y. 2007. Problems of democratic accountability in network and multilevel governance. European Law Journal 13 (4): 469–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pollitt, C., and P. Hupe. 2011. Talking about government: The role of magic concepts. Public Management Review 13 (5): 641–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Romzek, B.S., and J.M. Johnston. 2005. State social services contracting: Exploring the determinants of effective contract accountability. Public Administration Review 65 (4): 436–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Romzek, B.S., K. LeRoux, and J.M. Blackmar. 2012. A preliminary theory of informal accountability among network organizational actors. Public Administration Review 72 (3): 442–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sands, V. 2006. The right to know and obligation to provide: Public-Private partnerships, public knowledge, public accountability, public disenfranchisement and prisons cases. UNSW Law Journal 29 (3): 334–341.Google Scholar
  68. Savas, E.S. 1987. Privatization: The key to better government. Chatham: Chatham House.Google Scholar
  69. ———. 2000. Privatization and public-private partnerships. New York: Chatham House.Google Scholar
  70. Schillemans, T. 2016. Calibrating Public Sector Accountability: Translating experimental findings to public sector accountability. Public Management Review 18 (9): 1400–1420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sclar, E. 2000. You don’t always get what you pay for: The economics of privatization. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Shaoul, J., A. Stafford, and P. Stapleton. 2012. Accountability and corporate governance of public-private partnerships. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 23 (3): 213–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Stuart, A. 2017. Annual privatization report 2017: State Government Privatization. https://reason.org/wp-content/uploads/files/annual_privatization_report_2017_state_privatization.pdf.
  74. Thomann, E., E. Lieberherr, and K. Ingold. 2016. Torn between state and market: Private policy implementation and conflicting institutional logics. Policy and Society 35 (1): 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Thomann, E., P. Hupe, and F. Sager. 2018. Serving many masters: Public accountability in private policy implementation. Governance 31 (2): 299–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Thompson, D.F. 1980. Moral responsibility of public officials: The problem of many hands. American Political Science Review 74 (4): 905–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Trailer, J., P. Rechner, and R. Hill. 2004. A compound agency problem: An empirical examination of public-private partnerships. Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge 5 (1/2): 308–315.Google Scholar
  78. Van Slyke, D.M. 2003. The mythology of privatization in contracting for social services. Public Administration Review 63 (3): 296–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Verhoest, K., and P. Mattei. 2010. Special Issue on ‘Welfare governance reforms and effects in the Post-Golden Age’, 163–171. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  80. Vincent-Jones, P. 2005. Citizen redress in public contracting for human services. The Modern Law Review 68 (6): 887–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wang, T.K. 2013. Impacts of the hollow state on organizational practices and individual attitudes in the federal government. (Doctoral dissertation), Florida State University.Google Scholar
  82. Wedel, J.R. 2004. Blurring the state-private divide: flex organisations and the decline of accountability. In Globalisation, poverty and conflict, ed. Spoor M, 217–235. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  83. Willems, T., and W. Van Dooren. 2011. Lost in diffusion? How collaborative arrangements lead to an accountability paradox. International Review of Administrative Sciences 77 (3): 505–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. ———. 2012. Coming to terms with accountability: Combining multiple forums and functions. Public Management Review 14 (7): 1011–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Yang, K. 2012. Further understanding accountability in public organizations: Actionable knowledge and the structure–agency duality. Administration and Society 44 (3): 255–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Yang, K., and G. VanLandingham. 2012. How hollow can we go? A case study of the Florida’s efforts to outsource oversight of privatized child welfare services. The American Review of Public Administration 42 (5): 543–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Zhang, M., and J. Sun. 2012. Outsourcing in municipal governments: Experiences from the United States and China. Public Performance & Management Review 35 (4): 696–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public Service, Old Dominion UniversityNorfolkUSA
  2. 2.PennsylvaniaUSA
  3. 3.Department of Political ScienceAuburn UniversityAuburnUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Helen Dickinson
    • 1
  1. 1.University of New South WalesCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations