Working for Inclusion: Addressing Legal and Ethical Safeguards for LGBTQ Employees

  • Elizabeth F. R. GingerichEmail author
Living reference work entry


Hiring and advancing individuals based upon talent, credentials, proven performance, and level of determination is often obscured by exclusionary employment practices and discriminatory – whether latent and patent – mindsets. While ethical workplace decisions are generally predicated upon a fundamental understanding of fairness and a commitment to making the right decisions for all workers, oftentimes employers fail to exercise uniform and equitable judgment until there is mandatory direction. Thus, ethics in the workplace often starts with the law, its comprehensive understanding, and the unwavering compliance with all relevant legislative enactments. In recent years, judicial interpretation of anti-gender discrimination laws in the USA has embraced a more liberal definition and application, arguably fostering a more inclusive atmosphere in the workplace.


  1. Adams C (2017) The difference between sexual orientation and gender identity. CBS News. Accessed 1 Mar 2019
  2. Beachum L (2019) Transgender political candidates are increasingly common. The money backing them is not. Federal Politics Reporter. Accessed 6 Mar 2019
  3. de Vogue A (2017, September 26) LGBT employment cases on road to Supreme Court. CNN Supreme Court Reporter. Accessed 15 Oct 2017
  4. Equal Economic Opportunity Commission (EEOC) (2016) Gender discrimination. Accessed 28 Feb 2019
  5. Ford Z (2011) Employees who can come out at work “Flourish,” closeted workers “Languish or leave”. Center for Work-Life Policy. Accessed 3 Mar 2019
  6. Foust M (2018, September 17). California history textbooks now include LGBT Heroes. Accessed 25 Feb 2019
  7. Kozuch E (2018) HRC REPORT: startling data reveals half of LGBTQ employees in the U.S. Remain closeted at work. Accessed 3 Mar 2019
  8. LGBTQ Map (2017) Map of states that have sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination prohibited in public and private employment via statute, executive order, regulation, and/or case law. Accessed 2 Mar 2019
  9. Lohrke ML, Fu JR (2017) EEOC takes the lead in challenging sexual orientation discrimination. Okla Bar J 88(2):118–122Google Scholar
  10. McGovern A, McBride S, Gruberg S (2016) Nondiscrimination protections for LGBTQ communities – securing comprehensive and inclusive protections at all levels of government. Center for American Progress. Accessed 5 Mar 2019
  11. Merriam Webster Dictionary (2019) “Sexual orientation” and “Gender identity”. and Accessed 1 Mar 2019
  12. Mintz S (2016, March 24). Transgender inclusion in the workplace: a matter of ethics. Workplace Ethics. Accessed 4 Mar 2019
  13. Movement Advancement Project (MAP) (2019) Equality maps: state non-discrimination laws. Accessed 3 Mar 2019
  14. Mulvaney E (2017, October 11). 76 companies urge supreme court to support LGBT workplace protections. The National Law Journal. Accessed 5 Jan 2019
  15. Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (2019) About PFLAG. Accessed 1 Mar 2019
  16. Peña KM (2018) LGBT discrimination in the workplace: what will the future hold? Labor Employ Law 92(1):35Google Scholar
  17. Pew Research Center (2017) Homosexuality, gender, and religion. Pew Research Group. Accessed 27 Feb 2019
  18. Powers R (2018) Policies concerning LGBTQ people in the U.S. Military history of the policies of the armed forces for gay and lesbian servicemembers. The Balance Careers (Military Branches). Accessed 4 Mar 2019
  19. Schwarz H (2015, February 10) Obama’s latest “Evolution” on gay marriage. Washington Post. Accessed 5 Mar 2019
  20. Sears B, Mallory C, Meyer I (2011) Report shows continuing high levels of workplace discrimination, impacts productivity and health. UCLA Law School – The Williams InstituteGoogle Scholar
  21. Shafer R (2017) Big victory for LGBT rights: Hively v. Ivy Tech. Harvard Civ Rights-Civ Libr Law Rev 52(2):133Google Scholar
  22. Shivers NL (2017, June) The evolving definition of sex (UAL orientation) under title VII. Employment Law Authority. Accessed 10 Oct 2017
  23. Thayer D (2017, May 10) Hively v. Ivy tech community college of Indiana. Oxf J Law Religion 6(2):422–424. Accessed 9 Sept 2017
  24. The Post’s View Opinion (2019, February 6). The transgender military ban is damaging America and those who want to serve it. Washington Post. Accessed 1 Mar 2019
  25. Tilcsik A, Anteby M, Knight CR (2015) Concealable stigma and occupational segregation: toward a theory of gay and lesbian occupations. Adm Sci Q 46:414–442Google Scholar
  26. Workplace Equality Fact Sheet (2017) Out & equal workplace advocates. Accessed 3 Mar 2019

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Valparaiso UniversityValparaisoUSA

Personalised recommendations