Advertisement

The Language of Architecture and the Narrative of the Architect: An Essay on Spatial Orientation and Cultural Meaning in Architecture

  • Lourens MinnemaEmail author
Reference work entry

Abstract

This essay analyzes whether architecture is a language in the sense of being capable of telling its own story and how to assess the communicative value of the architects’ guiding story that inspired their architecture. The chapter argues that architecture’s “language of forms” is like a language insofar as architecture consists of traceable but in themselves meaningless unities that are built into recognizable patterns and insofar as it has a syntax of rules and conventions that prevent form combinations from becoming arbitrary. It is unlike a language insofar as its patterns and structure lack the semantic quality of making referential statements on the outside world. The same goes for music. The essay suggests that three basic relationships between humans and their world open up three distinctively orientated spaces: being-part, being-initiating, and being-at-a-distance. These correlate to mood space, movement space, and open space, respectively. The language of architectural forms, then, appeals to the tactile-emotional, mobile-goal-oriented, and visual-contemplative sensitivities of humans instead of translating narratives into architecture. The only story at the architects’ disposal is the story of their own taste and style. Architecture can do without the personal story of the architect’s taste and style, but this story has the added value of making explicit what is already visible, thus functioning like the decoration that illustrates the point. The larger frameworks of reference of cultural traditions that left their mark on architecture tend to be equally or more helpful as “guiding stories,” in cueing and experiencing architectural spaces as meaningful, as the “dry landscape garden” of Ryoan-ji in Kyoto can exemplify.

Keywords

Language of architecture Guiding story of the architect Architectural space Architecture as art form Meaning of architecture 

References

  1. Boehm, G. (1978). Zu einer Hermeneutik des Bildes. In H.-G. Gadamer & G. Boehm (Eds.), Seminar: Die Hermeneutik und die Wissenschaften (pp. 444–471). Frankfurt a/Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  2. Giedion, S. (1971). Architecture and the phenomena of transition. In The three space conceptions in architecture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Inaji, T., & Virgilio, P., transl. (1998). The garden as architecture: Form and Spirit in the Gardens of Japan, China and Korea. Tokyo: Kodansha International.Google Scholar
  4. Inoue, M. (1985). Space in Japanese architecture. New York/Tokyo: Weatherhill.Google Scholar
  5. Joedicke, J. (1985). Raum und form in der Architektur: Über den behutsamen Umgang mit der Vergangenheit. Space and form in architecture: A circumspect approach to the past. Stuttgart: Karl Krämer Verlag.Google Scholar
  6. Jones, L. (2000). The hermeneutics of sacred architecture: Experience, interpretation, comparison. Vol. 1: Monumental Occasions: reflections on the eventfulness of religious architecture. Vol. 2: Hermeneutical calisthenics: A morphology of ritual-architectural priorities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Keswick, M. (1978). The Chinese garden: History, art and architecture. Contributions and conclusion by Charles Jencks. London: Academy Editions.Google Scholar
  8. Kuitert, W. (2002). Themes in the History of Japanese Garden Art. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press. (first edition 1988. Themes, Scenes, and Taste in the History of Japanese Garden Art. Amsterdam: J.C. Gieben.).Google Scholar
  9. Langer, S. K. (1953). Feeling and form. A theory of art. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.Google Scholar
  10. Law, S. S. (2011). Being in traditional Chinese landscape painting. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 32(4), 369–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lyotard, J.-F. (1979). La condition postmoderne. Rapport sur le savoir. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
  12. Minnema, L. (2002). The paradox of Koan. Contemporary Buddhism: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 3(1), 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nitschke, G. (2007). Japanese gardens: Right angle and natural form. Köln: Taschen Verlag.Google Scholar
  14. Padovan, R. (1989). Dom Hans van der Laan: Architecture and the necessity of limits. Maastricht: Stichting Manutius.Google Scholar
  15. Picht, G. (1987). Kunst und mythos. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett/J.G. Cotta.Google Scholar
  16. Raulet, G. (1987). Singuläre geschichten und pluralistische ratio. In J. le Rider & G. Raulet (Eds.), Verabschiedung der (post-) moderne? Eine interdisziplinäre debatte (pp. 275–292). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
  17. Scruton, R. (1980). The aesthetics of architecture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Slawson, D. A. (1987). Secret teachings in the art of Japanese gardens: Design principles, aesthetic values. Tokyo/New York: Kodansha International Ltd..Google Scholar
  19. Ströker, E. (1975). Philosophische untersuchungen zum raum. (Erster Teil: Der gelebte Raum) Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
  20. van de Ven, C. (1987). Space in architecture. The evolution of a new idea in the theory and history of the modern movements. Assen/Maastricht/Wolfeboro: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
  21. van der Laan, D. H. (1977). De architectonische ruimte. Vijftien lessen over de dispositie van het menselijk verblijf. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
  22. van Eck, C. A. (1995). Metafoor en betekenis: Over het interpreteren van de vestibule van Michelangelo’s Biblioteca Laurentiana. In F.R. Ankersmit a.o. (Ed.), Hermeneutiek en Cultuur: Interpretatie in de kunst- en cultuurwetenschappen (pp. 126–156). Amsterdam: Boom.Google Scholar
  23. Vanderstappen, H. A. (2014). In R. E. Covey (Ed.), The landscape painting of China: Musings of a journeyman. Gainsville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
  24. Vos, F., & Zürcher, E. (1964). Spel zonder snaren. Enige beschouwingen over Zen. Deventer: N. Kluwer.Google Scholar
  25. Weiss, A. S. (2013). Zen landscapes: Perspectives on Japanese gardens and ceramics. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
  26. Wicks, R. (2004). Being in the dry Zen landscape. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 38(1), 112–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of the Comparative Study of Religion, Faculty of Religion and TheologyVrije UniversiteitAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations