Advertisement

Linguistic Landscape of Panama in the Early 21st Century: An Indigenous Orthography Striving to Decolonize

  • Ginés A. Sánchez AriasEmail author
Reference work entry

Abstract

Newcomers from all over the world emigrate to the Isthmus of Panama bringing along their culture and language. Today, at least 15 different languages make up the linguistic landscape of Panama. The predominant language is Spanish and the language of international business is English. Two Chinese languages are growing in importance while Hebrew, Hindi, and Arabic have also taken root as important enclaves of merchant activity across the urban spaces of Panama. As world trade becomes increasingly multilateral, new linguistic spaces become operational in cities sometimes replacing existing dominant languages, but in other instances diversifying opportunities as alternatives to the established oligopolies. Countries with high rates of economic growth like Panama see more dynamism on this aspect. Non-Latin scripts also diversify the legible landscape of Panama. Not only are these scripts increasingly practical to learn for their utility in the expanding market, but also for their potential to make a multicultural landscape more heterogeneous. By no means does this mean that diversity is voided of animosity across cultural groups. Indeed, towards the periphery of Panama’s linguistic landscape, among the least powerful folk, in terms of their economic power, indigenous communities become vulnerable to conspicuous actors and state institutions. At the border with capitalism, this otherwise illegible landscape includes seven indigenous languages that together make up ~12% of the population of Panama. On the physical and cultural borders with these communities, national education regimes are characteristically colonial, marking the injustice of cultural hegemony that continues to obscure self-determination of indigenous people. In turn, some groups resist by innovating alternative pedagogies and engaging literacy critically. Among the largest indigenous group in Panama, the Ngäbe, a new orthography and pedagogy has surfaced against the odds. It has the potential of being a model for decolonization, revitalization, and empowerment across the region. The changing linguistic landscape of Panama not only takes shape from international commercial flows but also from indigenous intellect and purpose.

Keywords

Indigenous Writing systems Panama Decolonial Hegemony 

Notes

Publisher’s note:

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. Anderson, G. L., & Irvine, P. (1993). Informing critical literacy with ethnography. In C. Lankshear & P. L. McLaren (Eds.), Critical literacy: Politics, praxis, and the postmodern. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bangama, T. K. (2015 [1976]). Maba Kubu. Kiad, Comarca Ngäbe-Bulgé, Panamá. Ministerio de Gobierno’s Milton Henríquez.Google Scholar
  3. Basso, K. (1990). Western Apache language and culture. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bender, M. C. (2002). Signs of Cherokee culture: Sequoyah’s syllabary in eastern Cherokee life. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  5. Castillero Calvo, A. (Ed.). (2004). Los primeros europeos: El descubrimiento del istmo de Bastidas a Balboa. En Historia General de Panamá. Vol. 1, Tomo 1. Comité Nacional del Centenario de la República, Ciudad de Panamá.Google Scholar
  6. Collins, J., & Blot, R. K. (2003). Literacy and literacies: Texts, power, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Constenla Umaña, A., & Margery Peña, E. (1991). Elementos de la fonología comparada Chocó. Revista de Filología y Lingüística, XVII(1–2), 137–191.Google Scholar
  8. Cooke, R. (1993). Alianzas y Relaciones Comerciales entre Indígenas y Españoles durante el Período de Contacto: Urracá, Esquegua y los Vecinos de Natá. Revista Nacional de Cultura, 25, 111–122.Google Scholar
  9. Cooke, R. (n.d.). Origenes, dispersion y supervivencia de las sociedades originarias de la sub-area istmica del area istmo-colombiana de America: una breve reseña en el marco de la historia profunda, manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
  10. Cooke, R., & Sánchez Herrera, L. A. (2004). Panamá Prehispánico. In A. Castillero Calvo (Ed.), Historia General de Panamá Volumen I, Tomo I: Las Sociedades Originarias, El Orden Colonial (pp. 3–46). Panama City: Ministerio de la Presidencia de la República de Panamá.Google Scholar
  11. Corbett, J. (2011). Discourse and intercultural communication. In K. Hyland & B. Paltridge (Eds.), The Bloomsbury companion to discourse analysis (pp. 306–320). New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  12. Davis, W. (2007 [2001]). Light at the edge of the world: A journey through the realm of vanishing cultures. British Columbia: D & M Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. EIB. Plan Nacional de Educación Intercultural Bilingüe. (2005). D. Binns Söri (Consultant). Ministerio de Educación, Panamá. www.binal.ac.pa/panal/kuna/downloads/eib.pdf
  14. Ethnologue. (2018). SIL international. https://www.ethnologue.com/language/gym
  15. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the city. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  17. Guionneau-Sinclair, F. (1987). Movimiento profético e innovación política entre los Ngobe (Guaymí) de Panamá: 1962–1984. Panamá: Universidad de Panamá.Google Scholar
  18. Helms, M. W. (1979). Ancient Panama: Chiefs in search of power. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  19. Helms, M. W. (1992). Thoughts on public symbols and distant domains relevant to the chiefdoms of lower Central America. In F. W. Lange (Ed.), Wealth and hierarchy in the intermediate area (pp. 317–329). Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks.Google Scholar
  20. Helms, M. W. (1994). Chiefdom rivalries, control, and external contacts in lower Central America. In E. M. Brumfiel & J. W. Fox (Eds.), Factional competition and political development in the New World (pp. 55–60). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Howe, J. (1977). Algunos problemas no resueltos de la etnohistoria del este de Panama. Revista Panameña de Antropología, 2(2), 30–47.Google Scholar
  22. Olwig, K. (1996). Recovering the substantive nature of landscape. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 86(4), 630–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Oviedo, G. F. (1986). Sumario de la natural historia de las Indias. Madrid: edición de Manuel Ballesteros.Google Scholar
  24. Rockwell, E. (2005). Indigenous accounts of dealing with writing. In T. L. McCarty (Ed.), Language, literacy, and power in schooling. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Romoli, K. (1987). Los de la Lengua de Cueva. Los grupos indígenas del istmo oriental en la época de la conquista española. Bogotá, edic. Tercer Mundo.Google Scholar
  26. Roosevelt, A. C. (1979). The goldsmith: The Coclé style of Central Panama. In A. C. Roosevelt & J. G. E. Smith (Eds.), The ancestors: Native artisans of the Americas (pp. 68–101). New York: Museum of the American Indian.Google Scholar
  27. Sánchez Arias, G. A., Miranda, M., & Brody, M. J. (2019). Ngäbere: An orthography of language revitalization in Western Panama. In A. Sherris & J. K. Peyton (Eds.), Teaching writing to children in indigenous languages: Instructional practices from global contexts. New York: Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  28. Sauer, C. O. (1966). The early Spanish main. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  29. Scherzer, J. (1983). Kuna ways of speaking: An ethnographic perspective. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  30. Sluyter, A. (2001). Colonialism and landscape in the Americas: Material/conceptual transformations and continuing consequences. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91(2), 410–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Street, B. (2003). What’s “new” in new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 77–91.Google Scholar
  32. Szwed, J. (1981). The ethnography of literacy. In M. F. Whiteman (Ed.), Writing: Development, and teaching of written communication. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  33. Thomason, S. (2001). Language contact. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Velasquez-Runk, J. (2015). Creating wild Darién: Centuries of Darién’s imaginative geography and its lasting effects. Journal of Latin American Geography, 14(3), 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wallerstein, I. (1979). The Capitalist World-Economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Young, P. D. (1971). Ngawbe: Tradition and change among the Western Guayamí of Panama. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Panama CityPanama

Personalised recommendations