Advertisement

The Challenge of New Intercultural Maps: Indigenous Language Revitalization Between Brazil and Aotearoa/New Zealand

  • Arianna Berardi-Wiltshire
  • Chang Whan
  • Marcus MaiaEmail author
  • Marcia Gojten Nascimento
  • Peter Petrucci
  • Beatrice Mari Ropata Te-Hei
  • Krystal Te Rina Warren
Reference work entry

Abstract

This chapter describes and critically reflects on an ongoing language revitalization project for Kaingang, an endangered Jê language spoken by approximately 20,000 people in southern Brazil. Stemming from collaboration between indigenous and nonindigenous academics from Brazil and Aotearoa/New Zealand, the Kaingang revitalization project is at once local and global. Fundamental to the project is the extent to which successful Māori language educational initiatives – such as Te Kohanga Reo (Māori language nest) – can be adapted to a Kaingang context. As with early language revitalization efforts by Māori educators and language activists, the Kaingang project is starting at the grassroots level. Specifically, the first step is to initiate a language nest in Nonoai, a village in which at least half of the adult population are Kaingang speakers. Later, and similar to the Māori context, it is envisaged that the preschool language nest in Nonoai will set an important example and encourage members of other villages to pass down their valuable knowledge of Kaingang language and culture to preschool children. This project has the potential to inspire speakers of other minority languages in Brazil. Family and community language policies can be shared and adapted to increase intergenerational transmission and safeguard endangered languages. However, collaborative projects such as this one also come with challenges and require critical reflection. Of utmost importance, such projects must operate with integrity and center around the indigenous minority people/language within the project. Ideological reflections are therefore critical to joint revitalization projects, and the chapter explores those questions further.

Keywords

Language revitalization Endangered languages Māori language nests Kohanga Reo movement Kaingang language 

Notes

Publisher’s note:

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. Berardi-Wiltshire, A. (2017). Endangered languages in the home: The role of family language policies in the revitalization of indigenous languages. Revista LinguíStica., 13(1), 328–348.Google Scholar
  2. D’Angelis, W. R. (1999). Contra a ditadura da escola. Cadernos Cedes, ano XIX(49), 18–25. http://www.scielo.br/pdf/ccedes/v19n49/a03v1949.pdf. acesso em 18 de julho de 2013.
  3. Da Rosa, A. (2015). Gĩr kãsir mré ẽg vĩ tỹ rãnhrãj ge ẽmã tỹ Guarita ki. A língua Kaingang na educação infantil da Escola Gomercindo Jẽtẽ Tenh Ribeiro da Terra Indígena Guarita. Florianópolis: UFSC. Trabalho de conclusão de curso.Google Scholar
  4. da Silva Laroque, L. F (2007). Fronteiras geográficas, étnicas e cultural envolvendo os Kaingang e suas lideranças no sul do Brasil – (1889–1930). Instituto Anchietano de Pesquisas. Antropologia, n.64. São Leopoldo: Unisinos. 343 p.Google Scholar
  5. Fishman, J. A. (2001). From theory to practice (and vice versa): Review, reconsideration and reiteration. In J. A. Fishman (Ed.), Can threatened languages be saved? (pp. 451–483). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Franchetto, B. (2008). O conhecimento científico das línguas indígenas da Amazônia no Brasil. In: F. Queixalós, O. Renault-Lescure (orgs.), As línguas amazônicas hoje (pp. 165–182). São Paulo: Instituto Socioambiental.Google Scholar
  7. Franchetto, B., & Godoy, G. (2017). Primeiros passos da revitalização da língua Guató: uma etnografia. Revista LinguíStica/Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 13(1), 281–302. ISSN 2238-975X 1. https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rl.
  8. Franchetto, B., & Maia, M. (2017). Educação e Revitalização Linguísticas, apresentação. Revista LinguíStica, 13, 1–10. https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rl/issue/view/463.Google Scholar
  9. Hermes, M. (2012). Indigenous language revitalization and documentation in the United States: Collaboration despite colonialism. Lang & Ling Compass, 6(3), 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hornberger, N. H. (2006). Frameworks and models in language policy and planning. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 24–41). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Hough, D., & Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2005). Beyond good intentions: Combatting linguistic genocide in education. Alternative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 1, 106–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. IBGE – Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics). (2010). Censo Demográfico 2010: Características gerais dos indígenas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 2012. Disponível em. Acesso em: fev. 2017.Google Scholar
  13. Irvine, J., & Gal, S. (2000). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In P. Kroskrity (Ed.), Regimes of Language (pp. 35–84). Santa Fe/Oxford: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
  14. King, J. (2001). Te kōhanga reo: Māori language revitalization. In L. Hinton & K. Hale (Eds.), The green book of language revitalization in practice (pp. 119–128). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  15. Lopes, J. D., & Garcia, M. V. C. (2016). A Construção da Plataforma Digital Interativa do Mapa Etno-Histórico de Curt Nimuendajú (The Construction of the Interative Digital Platform of Curt Nimuendaju’s Ethno-Historical Map). Revista Brasileira de Linguística Antropológica, 8(1), 2016.Google Scholar
  16. Maia, M. A. R. (2006). Manual de Lingüística: subsídios para a formação de professores indígenas na área de linguagem (Vol. 5000, 1st ed.). Brasília: Ministério da Educação e Cultura (MEC/SECAD). 268 p.Google Scholar
  17. Moore, D. (2011). As Línguas indígenas no Brasil hoje. In: H. Mello, C. Altenhofen, T. Raso. (Orgs.), Os Contatos linguísticos no Brasil (1st ed., pp. 217–240). Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG v.Google Scholar
  18. Nascimento, M. (2017). Evidencialidade em Kaingang: descrição, processamento e aquisição. PhD dissertation. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, UFRJ, 161 p.Google Scholar
  19. Nascimento, M., & Chang, W. (2018). The Māori language nest program: Voices of language and culture revitalization in Aotearoa, New Zealand. Ecolinguística: revista brasileira de ecologia e linguagem, 4, 108–127.Google Scholar
  20. Petrucci, P. R., & Miyahira, K. (2015). Uchinaaguchi in the linguistic landscape of Heiwa Dori and Makishi Market. In P. Heinrich, S. Miyara, & M. Shimoji (Eds.), Handbook of the Ryukyuan Languages (pp. 531–551). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  21. Petrucci, P. R., & Miyahira, K. (2016). “Can you call it Okinawan Japanese?”: World language delineations of an endangered language on YouTube. Journal of World Languages, 3(3), 204–223.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21698252.2017.1308305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. RCNEI-MEC. (1998). Referencial curricular nacional para as escolas indígenas-Ministério da Educação e do Desporto, Secretaria de Educação Fundamental. Brasília: MEC/SEF.Google Scholar
  23. Ricento, T. (2006). Theoretical perspectives in language policy: An overview. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 3–9). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. Rodrigues, A. D. (1993). Línguas indígenas: 500 anos de descobertas e perdas. Documentação de Estudos em Linguística Teórica e Aplicada D.E.L.T.A. 9.1, 83–103. São Paulo.Google Scholar
  25. Shohamy, E. G. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. Oxford: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. UNESCO. (2017). Atlas of the world’s languages in danger. http://www.unesco.org/languages-atlas/
  27. Warren, K. T. R. (2017). Te reo mãori: analysing the colonial history of the native mãori language of Aotearoa (New Zealand). Revista LinguíStica/Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 13(1), 349–366. ISSN 2238-975X 1. https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rl.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arianna Berardi-Wiltshire
    • 1
  • Chang Whan
    • 2
  • Marcus Maia
    • 3
    Email author
  • Marcia Gojten Nascimento
    • 3
  • Peter Petrucci
    • 1
  • Beatrice Mari Ropata Te-Hei
    • 1
  • Krystal Te Rina Warren
    • 1
  1. 1.Massey UniversityPalmerston NorthNew Zealand
  2. 2.Museum of the Indigenous People-FUNAIRio de JaneiroBrazil
  3. 3.Federal University of Rio de JaneiroRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations