Advertisement

Resistance, Action and Transformation in a Participatory Action Research (PAR) Project with Homeless Youth

  • David A. GoldbergEmail author
Living reference work entry
  • 11 Downloads
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

Data from a 1-year participatory action research (PAR) project with 35 homeless youth reveals many flee to the streets to resist dangerous, volatile, or dysfunctional homes.

The chapter details how participatory action research (PAR), the methodology used in the study, contests “expert” research into social ills and oppression from those who are detached from the communities they study.

During the PAR project, the youth reflected on their experiences and lifeworlds as they defined them. They examined homelessness from their standpoints of parenting, self, education, and shelter. The youth prioritized stereotyping and stigmatization as critical themes to address in their struggles for integration and acceptance.

Some young people noted that at a time in their lives when they hoped to expand their social networks and opportunities, stereotypes and stigmatization shamed them into “hiding” and “retreating.” Some said that society’s shunning of them for supposed shortcomings was reminiscent of experiences in their households.

The youth conceived a number of solutions to change people’s perceptions of them. They poured their energies into individual artworks to represent their findings. Of these, they selected “The Other Side of the Door,” a searing theater play written by a youth in the project. The play depicts the dysfunctional dynamics between a volatile mother and her 16-year-old son, who flees into homelessness.

To resist stereotypes and stigmatization, the youth argued passionately for the play to be presented in a number of places and institutions, ranging from schools of psychology, social work, and education to courts and juvenile corrections, places of worship, and high schools.

Keywords

Homeless youth Resistance Stereotyping and stigmatization Participatory action research Empowerment 

References

  1. Allport, G. W. (1954/1979). The nature of prejudice. Don Mills: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  2. Anastas, J. W. (2012). From scientism to science: How contemporary epistemology can inform practice research. Clinical Social Work, 40, 157–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barndt, D. (2001). Naming, making, and connecting – Reclaiming lost arts: The pedagogical possibilities of photo-story production. In P. Campbell & B. Burnaby (Eds.), Participatory practices in adult education (pp. 31–54). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, B., Gaventa, J., & Peters, J. (1990). Myles Horton and Paulo Freire. We make the road by walking: Conversations on education and social change. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brydon-Miller, M., & Maguire, P. (2009). Participatory action research: Contributions to the development of practitioner inquiry in education. Educational Action Research, 17(1), 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooper, K., & White, R. E. (2004). Burning issues: Foundations of education. Lanham: ScareCrow Education.Google Scholar
  7. Cruz, C. (2011). LGBTQ street youth talk back: A meditation on resistance and witnessing. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 24(5), 547–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edidin, J., Ganim, Z., Hunter, S., & Karnik, N. (2012). The mental and physical health of homeless youth: A literature review. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 43(3), 354–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Employment and Social Development Canada. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.esdc.gc.ca
  10. Fals Borda, O. (2001). Participatory (action) research in social theory: Origins and challenges. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 70–80). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Fals Borda, O., & Rahman, M. A. (1991). In B. O. Fals & M. A. Rahman (Eds.), Action and knowledge: Breaking the monopoly with participatory action research. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Freire, P. (1970/2006). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  13. Freire, P. (1973). By learning they can teach. Convergence, 6(1), 78–83.Google Scholar
  14. Gaventa, J. (1993). The powerful, the powerless, and the experts: Knowledge struggles in an information age. In P. Park, M. Brydon-Miller, B. Hall, & T. Jackson (Eds.), Voices of change: Participatory research in the United States and Canada (pp. 21–40). Westport: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
  15. Gaventa, J., & Cornwall, A. (2001). Power and knowledge. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 70–80). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  17. Goldberg, D. A. (2013). The road to inclusion: Citizenship and participatory action research as a means of redressing “otherness” among homeless youth. In P. P. Trifonas & B. Wright (Eds.), Critical peace education: Difficult dialogues (pp. 153–163). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Goldberg, D. A. (2017). Remembering the homeless students. In D. Booth & R. Coles (Eds.), What is a good teacher? (pp. 36–37). Markham: Pembroke.Google Scholar
  19. Goldberg, D. A. (2019). In Cooper, K., & Hughes, R. (Eds.), Treacherous crossroads: Neoliberalism, stereotyping, and homeless youth. Toronto: Life Rattle Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hall, B. L. (2001). I wish this were a poem of practices of participatory research. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 171–178). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Harter, L. M., Berquist, C., Scott Titsworth, B., Novak, D., & Brokaw, T. (2005). The structuring of invisibility among the hidden homeless: The politics of space, stigma, and identity construction. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 33(4), 305–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Herr, K., & Anderson, G. L. (2005). The action research dissertation: A guide for students and faculty. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kidd, S. A. (2007). Youth homelessness and social stigma. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(3), 291–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 363–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Merrifield, J. (1993). Putting scientists in their place: Participatory research in environmental and occupational health. In P. Park, M. Byrdon-Miller, B. Hall, & T. Jackson (Eds.), Voices of change: Participatory research in the United States and Canada (pp. 65–84). Westport: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
  26. Murphy, J. F., & Tobin, K. J. (2011). Homelessness comes to school. Phi Delta Kappan, 93(3), 32–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nyemba, F., & Mayer, M. (2018). Exploring the roots of participatory action research: An interview with Dr. Marja-Liisa Swantz. Action Research, 16(3), 319–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Paradise, M., & Cauce, A. M. (2002). Home street home: The interpersonal dimensions of adolescent homelessness. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 2(1), 223–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rayburn, R. L., & Guittar, N. A. (2013). “This is where you are supposed to be”: How homeless individuals cope with stigma. Sociological Spectrum, 33(2), 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schneider, D. J. (2004). The psychology of stereotyping. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  31. Shaull, R. (1970) forward in Freire, P. (1970/2006). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  32. Swantz, M. L. (2008). Participatory action research as practice. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The Sage handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 31–48). Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. The Harvard mental health letter. (2010). The evolving understanding of stigma. Theories differ about why it is so pervasive and so hard to eradicate. The Harvard Mental Health Letter/From the Harvard Medical School, 27(1), 6.Google Scholar
  34. Trifonas, P. (2004). Postmodernism, poststructuralism and difference. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 20, 151–163.Google Scholar
  35. Trifonas, P. (2009a). Deconstructing research: Paradigms lost. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 32(3), 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Trifonas, P. (2009b). Prolegomena to a new academic responsibility: What it means to know and the university. Educational Theory, 59(3), 313–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wadsworth, Y. (1998). What is participatory action research? http://www.aral.com.au/ari/p-ywadsworth98.html
  38. Whitmore, E., & McKee, C. (2001). Six street youth who could. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 396–402). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ontario Association of Jungian AnalystsTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations