Advertisement

The Politics of Seeing

Art and the Violence of Aesthetics
  • Anthi TrifonasEmail author
  • Peter Pericles Trifonas
Living reference work entry
  • 5 Downloads
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

The measure of art is the ability to induce modes of sensibility that create new forms of intelligibility. In Les Desmoiselles d’Avignon and Guernica, Pablo Picasso enables the viewer to see what was not there before and in a different way. The paintings politicize aesthetic acts as moments of a questioning and reflection on subjectivity toward an emancipation of the image from past experience. Art no longer becomes a witness signifying the timeless truths of life, but is a battleground triggering nostalgia and disillusionment mourning the loss of meaning. The politics of seeing depends on the violence of aesthetics. That is, the extent to which artistic regimes impact the production of what is knowable and what is visible are reproduced and resisted in a work of art.

Keywords

Aesthetics Semiotics Art history Structuralism Modern art Painting 

References

  1. Arnheim, R. (1954). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar
  2. Arnheim, R. (1962). Picasso’s Guernica. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barthes, R. (1964). Image—Music—Text. New York: Hill & Wang.Google Scholar
  4. Chave, A. C. (1994). New encounters with Les Demoiselles d’Avignon: Gender, race and the origins of cubism. The Art Bulletin, 76(4), 596–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Derrida, J. (1987). The truth in painting (trans: Bennington, G., & McLeod, I.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Florman, L. (2012). Insistent, resistant Cézanne: On Picasso’s “Three Women” and ‘Les Demoiselles D’avignon’. Source: Notes in the History of Art, 31/32(4/1), 19–26.Google Scholar
  7. Janson, H. W., & Janson, A. F. (1997). History of art. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  8. Krampen, M. (1973). Iconic signs, supersigns and models. Versus, 4, 101–108.Google Scholar
  9. Noth, W. (1985). Handbook of semiotics. Indiana: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Rancière, J. (2004). The politics of aesthetics (trans: Rockhil, G.). Great Britain: Continuum.Google Scholar
  11. Saint-Martin, F. (1990). Semiotics of visual language. Indiana: University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.York UniversityTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Ontario Institute for Studies and EducationUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations