Health Services Information: Key Concepts and Considerations in Building Episodes of Care from Administrative Data

  • Erik HellstenEmail author
  • Katie Jane Sheehan
Reference work entry
Part of the Health Services Research book series (HEALTHSR)


Health-care utilization data are traditionally presented in discrete, itemized formats that offer a fragmented view of the total picture of services delivered to treat an individual patient’s health condition. In response, health services researchers have struggled for 150 years to define more meaningful units of analysis from the outputs of health-care services that are suitable for investigation. Beginning with Florence Nightingale in 1863, the basis for and application of an alternate conceptual approach – the episode of care construct – for organizing health-care events into a clinically meaningful unit of analysis has evolved. In recent decades this approach has been operationalized to support a variety of health services research and policy applications. To construct an episode, researchers must define three key elements including the index event, the scope of services included, and the endpoint. How these elements are defined is dependent on the objective of the episode construction and the data that are available. Here, the history of the episode of care concept, the core elements of an episode, and the researcher’s key considerations and decision points in determining appropriate parameters for these elements are described. Episode-based case mix classification systems, risk adjustment, and attribution rules are also examined. Lastly, two examples of episode of care construction and policy applications are discussed.


  1. Birkmeyer JD, Gust C, Baser O, et al. Medicare payments for common inpatient procedures: implications for episode-based payment bundling. Health Serv Res. 2010;45(6 Pt 1):1783–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Canadian Institute for Health Information. 2015. Accessed 27 Oct 2015.
  3. Cave DG. Profiling physician practice patterns using diagnostic episode clusters. Med Care. 1995;33(5):463–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative: general information. 2014. Accessed 27 Oct 2015
  5. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Supplemental QRURs and episode-based payment measurement. 2015a. Accessed 28 Oct 2015.
  6. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Bundled payments for care improvement (BPCI) initiative fact sheet. 2015b. Accessed 28 Oct 2015.
  7. Chamberlayne R, Green B, Barer ML, et al. Creating a population-based linked health database: a new resource for health services research. Can J Public Health. 1998;89(4):270–3.Google Scholar
  8. Codman EA. The product of a hospital. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1914;1990;114(11):1106–11.Google Scholar
  9. Falk IS, Schonfeld HK, Harris BR, et al. The development of standards for the audit and planning of medical care: I. Concepts, research design, and the content of primary physician’s care. Am J Public Health. 1967;57:1118–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feldstein PJ. Research on the demand for health services. Health Serv Res. 1966;44(3):128–65.Google Scholar
  11. Fetter RB, Shin Y, Freeman JL, et al. Case mix definition by diagnosis-related groups. Med Care. 1980;18((2 Suppl) iii):1–53.Google Scholar
  12. Fransoo R, Yogendran M, Olafson K, et al. Constructing episodes of inpatient care: data infrastructure for population-based research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Health Quality Ontario. Quality-based procedures: clinical handbook for hip fracture. Toronto: Health Quality Ontario; 2013. Accessed 27 Oct 2015.Google Scholar
  14. High Value Health Care Project. 2011. Accessed 27 Oct 2016.
  15. Hornbrook MC, Hurtado AV, Johnson RE. Health care episodes: definition, measurement and use. Med Care Rev. 1985;42(2):163–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hussey P, Sorbero M, Mehrotra A, et al. Using episodes of care as a basis for performance measurement and payment: moving from concept to practice. Health Aff (Project Hope). 2009;28(5):1406–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jain R, Basinski A, Kreder HJ. Nonoperative treatment of hip fractures. Int Orthop. 2003;27(1):11–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lohr KN, Brook RH. Quality of care in episodes of respiratory illness among Medicaid patients in New Mexico. Ann Intern Med. 1980;92(1):99–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. MaCurdy T, Kerwin J, Theobald N. Need for risk adjustment in adapting episode grouping software to Medicare data. Health Care Financ Rev. 2009;30(4):33–46.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Medicare Payment Advisory Committee. Report to the congress: reforming the delivery system; 2008. Accessed 28 Oct 2015.
  21. Meier DE. Increased access to palliative care and hospice services: opportunities to improve value in health care. Milbank Q. 2011;89(3):343–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Menzies IB, Mendelson DA, Kates SL, et al. Prevention and clinical management of hip fractures in patients with dementia. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2010;1(2):63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moscovice I. Selection of an appropriate unit of analysis for ambulatory care settings. Med Care. 1977;15(12):1024–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nightingale F. Notes on hospitals. London: Longman, Gree, Longman, Roberts and Green; 1863.Google Scholar
  25. Nutting PA, Shorr GI, Burkhalter BR. Assessing the performance of medical care. Med Care. 1981;21(3):281–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Reschovsky JD, Hadley J, O’Malley AJ, et al. Geographic variations in the cost of treating condition-specific episodes of care among Medicare patients. Health Serv Res. 2014;49(1):32–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schonfeld HK, Falk IS, Lavietes PH, et al. The development of standards for the audit and planning of medical care: pathways among primary physicians and specialists for diagnosis and treatment. Med Care. 1968;6(2):101–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schulman KA, Yabroff KR, Kong J, et al. A claims data approach to defining an episode of care. Health Serv Res. 1999;34(2):603–21.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Scitovsky A. Changes in the costs of treatment of selected illnesses, 1951–65. Am Econ Rev. 1967;57(5):1182–95.Google Scholar
  30. Sheehan KJ, Sobolev B, Bohm E, Sutherland J, Kuramoto L, Guy P, Hellsten E, Jaglal S for the Canadian Collaborative on Hip Fractures. Constructing episode of care from acute hospital records for studying effects of timing of hip fracture surgery. J Orthop Res. 2016;34(2):197–204.Google Scholar
  31. Sobolev BG, Kuramoto L. Analysis of waiting-time data in health services research. New York: Springer; 2007.Google Scholar
  32. Sobolev BG, Levy AR, Kuramoto L, et al. Do longer delays for coronary artery bypass surgery contribute to preoperative mortality in less urgent patients? Med Care. 2006;44(7):680–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Solon J, Sheps CG, Lee SS. Delineating patterns of medical care. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1960;50(8):1105–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Solon JA, Feeney JJ, Jones SH, et al. Delineating episodes of medical care. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1967;57(3):401–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Solon JA, Rigg RD, Jones SH, et al. Episodes of care: nursing students’ use of medical services. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1969;59(6):936–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Struijs JN, De Jong-Van Til JT, Lemmens LC, Drewes HW, De Bruin SR, Baan CA. Three years of bundled payment for diabetes care in the Netherlands. Impact on health care delivery process and the quality of care. RIVM Report. 2012a;260013001. Accessed 27 Oct 2016.
  37. Struijs JN, Mohnen SM, Molema CC, De Jong-van Til JT, Baan CA. Effects of bundled payment on curative health care costs in the Netherlands: an analysis for diabetes care and vascular risk management based on nationwide claim data, 2007-2010. RIVM Report. 2012b;260013001. Accessed 27 Oct 2016.
  38. Sutherland JM, Hellsten E, Yu K. Bundles: an opportunity to align incentives for continuing care in Canada? Health Policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 2012;107(2–3):209–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vertrees JC, Averill RF, Eisenhandler J, et al. Bundling post-acute care services into MS-DRG payments. Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2013;3(3):E1–E19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Volk T, Hahn L, Hayden R, et al. Reliability audit of a regional cardiac surgery registry. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;114(6):903–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. White KL, Williams TF, Greenberg BG. The ecology of medical care. N Engl J Med. 1961;265:885–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wingert TD, Kralewski JE, Lindquist TJ, et al. Constructing episodes of care from encounter and claims data: some methodological issues. Inquiry. 1995;32(4):430–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Health Quality OntarioTorontoCanada
  2. 2.School of Population and Public Health, The University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations