Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining

2018 Edition
| Editors: Reda Alhajj, Jon Rokne

Virtual Goods in Social Media

  • Jarosław JankowskiEmail author
  • Juho Hamari
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_361
  • 21 Downloads

Synonyms

Glossary

Digital Goods, Virtual Goods

Digital representation of material goods available in electronic systems

Social Platform

Electronic system supporting the building of social relations in electronic environment

Social Game

Entertainment software targeted to players connected with social relations

Definition

Virtual goods refer to virtual objects such as items, avatar clothing, weapons, virtual furniture, currencies, characters, and tokens that commonly exist solely within variety of virtual environments such as online games and virtual worlds where they are usable. Virtual goods are a form of digital goods. Digital goods are non-physical goods (Fairfield 2005; Hamari and Keronen 2016; Hamari and Lehdonvirta 2010; Harviainen and Hamari 2015; Lehdonvirta 2009; Lehdonvirta and Castronova 2014; Hamari 2015).

Introduction

During the last decade, it was difficult to identify the economic potential of social...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the National Science Centre, Poland, grant no. 2016/21/B/HS4/01562.

References

  1. Bainbridge WS (2007) The scientific research potential of virtual worlds. Science 317(5837):472–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes S (2007) Virtual worlds as a medium for advertising. Data Base Adv Inf Syst 38(4):45–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cheung CMK, Chiu P, Lee MKO (2011) Online social networks: why do students use Facebook? Comput Hum Behav 27(4):1337–1343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheung CM, Shen XL, Lee ZW, Chan TK (2015) Promoting sales of online games through customer engagement. Electron Commer Res Appl 14(4):241–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clemons EK (2009) The complex problem of monetizing virtual electronic social networks. Decis Support Syst 48(1):46–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fairfield J (2005) Virtual property. Boston University Law Rev 85:1047Google Scholar
  7. Flavian C, Guinaliu M, Gurrea R (2006) The role played by perceived usability, satisfaction and consumer trust on website loyalty. Inf Manag 43(1):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gartner Research (2010) Hype cycle for emerging technologies. http://blogs.gartner.com/hypecyclebook/2010/09/07/2010-emerging-technologies-hype-cycle-is-here. Accessed 7 Sept 2012
  9. Gaudiosi J (2010) A virtual farm turns new ground for game developers. http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/03/25/us-videogames-networking-idUSTRE62O1NB20100325?type=technologyNews. Accessed 28 Aug 2012
  10. Grimes MS, Feenberg A (2009) Rationalizing play: a critical theory of digital gaming. Inf Soc 25:105–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guo Y, Barnes S (2007) Why people buy virtual items in virtual worlds with real money. Data Base Adv Inf Syst 38(4):69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hamari J (2015) Why do people buy virtual goods? Attitude towards virtual good purchases versus game enjoyment. Int J Inf Manag 35(3):299–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hamari J, Järvinen A (2011) Building customer relationship through game mechanics in social games. In: Cruz-Cunha M, Carvalho V, Tavares P (eds) Business, technological and social dimensions of computer games: multidisciplinary developments, Hershey, IGI Global, pp 348–365Google Scholar
  14. Hamari J, Keronen L (2016) Why do people buy virtual goods? A literature review. In: Proceedings of the 49th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS), Hawaii, 5–8 Jan 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2016.171
  15. Hamari J, Lehdonvirta V (2010) Game design as marketing: how game mechanics create demand for virtual goods. Int J Bus Sci Appl Manag 5(1):14–29Google Scholar
  16. Hamari J, Keronen L, Alha K (2015) Why do people play games? A review of studies on adoption and use. In: Proceedings of the 48th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS), Hawaii, 5–8 Jan 2015Google Scholar
  17. Hamari J, Hanner N, Koivisto J (2017) Service quality explains why people use freemium services but not if they go premium: an empirical study in free-to-play games. Int J Inf Manag 37(1):1449–1459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harviainen JT Hamari J (2015) Seek, share, or withhold: information trading in MMORPGs. J Doc 71(6):1119–1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hernandez-Ortega B, Jiménez-Martínez J, Martín-DeHoyos J (2008) Differences between potential, new and experienced E-customers: analysis of E-purchasing behavior. Internet Res 18(3):248–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hinz O, Spann M, Hann I (2010) Prestige goods and social status in virtual worlds. In: Proceedings of the international conference on information systems, Missouri. http://www.habbo.com. Accessed 15 Sept 2012
  21. Jankowski J, Bródka P, Hamari J (2016) A picture is worth a thousand words: an empirical study on the influence of content visibility on diffusion processes within a virtual world. Behav Inform Technol 35:926–945.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2016.1212932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kimppa KK, Heimo OI, Harviainen JT (2016) First dose is always freemium. ACM SIGCAS Comput Soc 45(3):132–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lehdonvirta V (2009) Virtual item sales as a revenue model: identifying attributes that drive purchase decisions. Electron Commer Res 9(1–2):97–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lehdonvirta V, Castronova E (2014) Virtual economies: design and analysis. MIT Press: Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  25. Lehdonvirta V, Wilska TA, Johnson M (2009) Virtual consumerism: case habbo hotel. Inf Commun Soc 12(7):1059–1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lewis C, Wardrip-Fruin N, Whitehead J (2012) Motivational game design patterns of'ville games. In: Proceedings of the international conference on the foundations of digital games. ACM, pp 172–179Google Scholar
  27. Liao C, Palvia P, Lin HN (2006) The roles of habit and web site quality in E-commerce. Int J Inf Manag 26(6):469–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. MäNtymäKi M, Salo J (2011) Teenagers in social virtual worlds: Continuous use and purchasing behavior in Habbo Hotel. Computers in Human Behavior 27(6):2088–2097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mehta R (2009) Maximizing virtual goods through dynamic pricing. http://virtualgoodsinsider.com/2009/12/03/maximizing-virtual-goods-through-dynamic-pricing. Accessed 23 Aug 2012
  30. Messingera PR, Stroulia E, Bonea KM et al (2009) Virtual worlds – past, present, and future: new directions in social computing. Decis Support Syst 47(3):204–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mihaly M (2009) The genesis of the virtual goods model. http://virtual-economy.org/2009/11/01/thegenesisofthevirtualgoo. Accessed 21 Aug 2012
  32. Piper Jaffray Investment Research Report (2009) Pay to play: paid internet servicesGoogle Scholar
  33. Reisinger D (2010) Virtual goods revenue to hit $7.3 billion this year. http://news.cnet.com/8301-135063-20022780-17.html. Accessed 14 Aug 2012
  34. Schonfeld E (2006) Cyworld ready to attack MySpace. http://money.cnn.com/2006/07/27/technology/cyworld0727.biz2/index.htm. Accessed 2 Sept 2012
  35. Shelton AK (2010) Defining the lines between virtual and real world purchases: second life sells, but who’s buying? Comput Hum Behav 26(6):1223–1227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shin DH (2008) Understanding purchasing behaviors in a virtual economy: consumer behavior involving virtual currency in web 2.0 communities. Interact Comput 20(4–5):433–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sivan Y (2009) Technology, economy and standards in virtual worlds. J Virtual Worlds Res 2(3):1–8Google Scholar
  38. Smith J, Hudson Ch (2011) Inside virtual goods: the US virtual goods market 2011–2012. http://research.insidenetwork.com/inside-virtual-goods-the-us-virtual-goods-market-2011-2012. Accessed 14 Aug 2012
  39. Spencer J (2009) Virtual worlds research: past, present and future. J Virtual Worlds Res 1(1):1–12Google Scholar
  40. Warr WA (2008) Social software: fun and games, or business tools? J Inf Sci 34(4):591–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wu E, Chou P (2011) Customer segmentation of multiple category data in e-commerce using a soft-clustering approach. Electron Commer Res Appl 10(3):331–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Computer Science and Information TechnologyWest Pomeranian University of TechnologySzczecinPoland
  2. 2.Game Research LabUC Pori, Tampere University of TechnologyTampereFinland
  3. 3.UC Pori, University of TurkuTurkuFinland

Section editors and affiliations

  • Przemyslaw Kazienko
    • 1
  • Jaroslaw Jankowski
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Computer Science and Management, Department of Computational IntelligenceWroclaw University of Science and TechnologyWrocławPoland
  2. 2.Faculty of Computer Science and Information TechnologyWest Pomeranian University of TechnologySzczecinPoland