Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining

2018 Edition
| Editors: Reda Alhajj, Jon Rokne

Human Behavior and Social Networks

  • Adrian David Cheok
  • Bosede Iyiade Edwards
  • Idris Oladele Muniru
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_235

Synonyms

Glossary

24/7

Referring to 24 h a day, 7 days a week, especially in reference to Internet connection and communication

Dunbar’s number

A suggested cognitive limit to the number of people with whom one can maintain stable social relationships

Hyperconnectivity

The phenomenon of society being always connected through networks, readily accessible, interactive, and information rich

Social learning

Learning incorporating social media, gaming, real-time feedback, and simulations

Definition

Human behavior describes the ways in which humans act and interact, and it is influenced by several factors including genetic makeup and sociocultural factors or the interaction of these. The influence of technology, and especially social media, on human life has brought about tremendous changes in human behavior; these changes cut across several areas of human interaction, affecting the way people communicate, work, learn,...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Alejandro J (2010) Journalism in the age of social media. Reuters institute fellowship paper, University of Oxford, 2009–2010Google Scholar
  2. Apicella CL, Marlowe FW, Fowler JH, Christakis NA (2012) Social networks and cooperation in hunter-gatherers. Nature 481(7382):497–501.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baek YM, Bae Y, Jang H (2013) Social and parasocial relationships on social network sites and their differential relationships with users’ psychological well-being. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 16(7):512–517.  https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Braswell H, Kushner HI (2012) Suicide, social integration, and masculinity in the U.S. military. Soc Sci Med 74(4):530–536.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.07.031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruhn J (2009) The group effect, p 171.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0364-8
  6. Cain J, Policastri A (2011) Using Facebook as an informal learning environment. Am J Pharm Educ 75(10):207.  https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7510207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charsky D (2010) From edutainment to serious games: a change in the use of game characteristics. Games Cult 5(2):177–198.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412009354727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. CNN Library (2017) 2016 Presidential Campaign Hacking Fast Facts. CNN, 9 Jan 2017Google Scholar
  9. Creative Displays (2015) History of Communication from Cave Drawings to the Web. In: Creat. Displays Now. http://www.creativedisplaysnow.com/articles/history-of-communication-from-cave-drawings-to-the-web/
  10. Dabbagh N, Kitsantas A (2012) Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: a natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. Internet High Educ 15(1):3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Del Bosque D (2013) Will you be my friend? Social networking in the workplace. New Libr World 114(9/10):428–442.  https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-04-2013-0033
  12. Deri C (2005) Social networks and health service utilization. J Health Econ 24(6):1076–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dunbar RIM (2009) The social brain hypothesis and its implications for social evolution. Ann Hum Biol 36(5):562–572.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03014460902960289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Facebook (2016) Game on: you can now play games on messenger. Retrieved from http://newsroom.fb.com/news/2016/11/game-on-you-can-now-play-games-on-messenger/
  15. Farmer A, Holt C, Cook M (2009) Social networking sites: a novel portal for communication. Postgrad Med J 85(1007):455–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fox J, Warber KM (2014) Social networking sites in romantic relationships: attachment, uncertainty, and partner surveillance on facebook. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 17(1):3–7.  https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gray JR, Thompson PM (2004) Neurobiology of intelligence: Science and ethics. Nat Rev Neurosci 5:471–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamali S El, Mahdaoui L (2015) Towards a reeingeniering of business process management lifecycle by the use of social networks. In: Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), 2015 IEEE 9th International Conference on. IEEE, pp 526–527Google Scholar
  19. Hanna R, Rohm A, Crittenden V (2011) We’re all connected: The power of the social media ecosystem. Bus Horiz 54(3):265–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holzner S (2008) Facebook marketing: leverage social media to grow your business. Pearson Education, IndianaGoogle Scholar
  21. Ikeda A, Kawachi I (2010) Social networks and health. In: Handbook of behavioral medicine SE - 18. Springer, New York, pp 237–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Interpol (2016) Cybercrime. Retrieved 9 Dec 2016, from https://www.interpol.int/Crime-areas/Cybercrime/Cybercrime
  23. ITU News (2010) The rise of social networking. http://www.itu.int/net/itunews/issues/2010/06/35.aspx
  24. Jackson M (2010) An overview of social networks and economic applications. In: Benhabib J, Bisin A, Jackson MO (eds) Handb Soc Econ 1:511–585Google Scholar
  25. Judd T, Kennedy G (2011) Measurement and evidence of computer-based task switching and multitasking by “Net Generation” students. Comput Educ 56:625–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim J (2012) The institutionalization of YouTube: from user-generated content to professionally generated content. Media Cult Soc 34(1):53–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Konert J, Gerwien N, Göbel S, Steinmetz R (2013) Bringing game achievements and community achievements together. In: European Conference on Games Based Learning. p 319Google Scholar
  28. Labus A, Despotović-Zrakić M, Radenković B, Bogdanović Z, Radenković M (2015) Enhancing formal e-learning with edutainment on social networks. J Comput Assist Learn 31(6):592–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lanzi D (2011) Capabilities and social cohesion. Camb J Econ 35(6):1087–1101.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/ber015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Larsen CA (2014) Social cohesion: definition, measurement and developments. Centre for Comparative Welfare Studies, Aalborg University, AalborgGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee J (2013) 3 awesome social networks just for gamers. Retrieved from http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/3-awesome-social-networks-just-for-gamers/
  32. Lefebvre L, Blackburn K, Brody N (2014) Navigating romantic relationships on Facebook: extending the relationship dissolution model to social networking environments. J Soc Pers Relat 32(1):78–98.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514524848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lipton E, Sanger DE, Shane S (2016) The perfect weapon: how Russian cyberpower invaded the U.S. New York Times, 13 Dec 2016Google Scholar
  34. Magiani R (2014) Social Media and Its Effect on Communication. Solari Commun 9330Google Scholar
  35. Mangold W, Faulds D (2009) Social media: the new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Bus Horiz 52(4):357–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mckenna KYA, Green AS, Gleason MEJ (2002) Relationship formation on the Internet: what’s the big attraction? J Soc Issues 58(1):9–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mitzevick N (2015) How social media is shaping arts. InDaily, Aug 2015Google Scholar
  38. Neti S (2011) Social media and its role in marketing. Int J Enterp Computing and Bus Syst 1(2):1–5Google Scholar
  39. Newcomer E (2015) Uber raises funding at $62.5 billion valuation. Bloomberg. http://www.Bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-12-03/uber-Raises-Funding-at-62-5-Valuation. Published 3 Dec 2015
  40. Ottoni R, Pesce JP, Las Casas DB, et al (2013) Ladies First: Analyzing Gender Roles and Behaviors in Pinterest. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM-13). pp 457–465Google Scholar
  41. Qualman E (2012) Socialnomics: how social media transforms the way we live and do business. Book.  https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgt363
  42. Radicati S, Yamasaki T (2012) Social media market, 2012–2016. In: The Radicati Group, Inc., technology reportGoogle Scholar
  43. Rapeepisarn K, Wong KW, Fung CC, Depickere A (2006) Similarities and differences between learn through play and edutainment. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Australasian conference on interactive entertainment, pp 28–32Google Scholar
  44. Redecker C, Ala-Mutka K, Punie Y (2010). Learning 2.0 – the impact of social media on learning in Europe. In: Policy brief. JRC scientific and technical report. EUR JRC56958Google Scholar
  45. Rock A, Barrington C, Abdoulayi S, Tsoka M (2016) Social networks, social participation, and health among youth living in extreme poverty in rural Malawi. Soc Sci Med 170(55–62)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shah S (2016) Twitter Gaming is the social network’s new hub for games, gamers, eSports. Digital Trends, 14 Jan 2016Google Scholar
  47. Smith K, Christakis N (2008) Social networks and health. Annu Rev Sociol 34:405–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tang JH, Chen MC, Yang CY, Chung TY, Lee YA (2016) Personality traits, interpersonal relationships, online social support, and Facebook addiction. Telematics Inform 33(1):102–108.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.06.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thomson K, Purcell K, Rainie L (2013) Overall impact of technology on the arts. http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/04/section-6-overall-impact-of-technology-on-the-arts/. Retrieved 9 Dec 2016
  50. Transparencymarketresearch.com (2016) Global chatbot market: large enterprises inclined toward prospect of chatbot-enabled business process automation, finds TMRGoogle Scholar
  51. Valente T (2012) Social networks and health: models, methods, and applications. Healthc Inform Res 18(4):287–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Veen W, Vrakking B (2006) Homo Zappiens: Reshaping learning in the digital age. Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

  1. Neustaedter C, Harrison S, Sellen A (2013) Connecting families: an introduction. Springer, London.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4192-1_1
  2. Sparrow B, Liu J, Wegner DM (2011) Google effects on memory: cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science 333(6043):776. Interact with the social networksCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adrian David Cheok
    • 1
    • 2
  • Bosede Iyiade Edwards
    • 1
    • 2
  • Idris Oladele Muniru
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Imagineering InstituteIskandar PuteriMalaysia
  2. 2.City, University of LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.Department of Computer ScienceUniversiti Teknologi MalaysiaSkudaiMalaysia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Przemysław Kazienko
    • 1
  • Jaroslaw Jankowski
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and Management, Institute of InformaticsWrocław University of TechnologyWrocławPoland
  2. 2.Faculty of Computer Science and Information TechnologyWest Pomeranian University of TechnologySzczecinPoland