Abstract
Many data mining and machine learning projects require information from various data sources to be integrated and linked before they can be used for further analysis. A crucial task of such data integration is to identify which records refer to the same real-world entities across databases when no common entity identifiers are available and when records can contain errors and variations. This process of record linkage therefore has to rely upon the attributes that are available in the databases to be linked. For databases that contain personal information, for example, of customers, taxpayers, or patients, these are commonly their names, addresses, phone numbers, and dates of birth.To improve the scalability of the linkage process, blocking or indexing techniques are commonly applied to limit the comparison of records to pairs or groups that likely correspond to the same entity. Records are compared using a variety of comparison functions, most commonly approximate string comparators that account for typographical errors and variations in textual attributes. The compared records are then classified into matches, non-matches, and potential matches, depending upon the decision model used. If training data in the form of true matches and non-matches are available, supervised classification techniques can be employed. However, in many practical record linkage applications, no ground truth data are available, and therefore unsupervised approaches are required. An approach known as probabilistic record linkage is commonly employed. In this article we provide an overview of record linkage with an emphasis on the classification aspects of this process.
Recommended Reading
Bhattacharya I, Getoor L (2007) Collective entity resolution in relational data. ACM Trans Knowl Discov Data 1(1), 5-es, pp 1–35
Bloothooft G, Christen P, Mandemakers K, Schraagen M (2015) Population reconstruction. Springer, Cham
Christen P (2012) Data matching – concepts and techniques for record linkage, entity resolution, and duplicate detection. Data-centric systems and applications. Springer, Berlin/New York
Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB (1977) Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc Ser B 19:380–393
Dunn H (1946) Record linkage. Am J Publ Health 36(12):1412
Fellegi IP, Sunter AB (1969) A theory for record linkage. J Am Stat Assoc 64(328):1183–1210
Ferrante A, Boyd J (2012) A transparent and transportable methodology for evaluating data linkage software. J Biomed Inf 45(1):165–172
Herzog TN, Scheuren FJ, Winkler WE (2007) Data quality and record linkage techniques. Springer, New York/London
Herzog TN, Scheuren FJ, Winkler WE (2010) Record linkage. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat 2(5): 535–543
Kum HC, Krishnamurthy A, Machanavajjhala A, Ahalt SC (2014) Social genome: putting big data to work for population informatics. IEEE Comput 47(1):56–63
Lahiri P, Larsen M (2005) Regression analysis with linked data. J Am Stat Assoc 100:222–230
Larsen MD, Rubin DB (2001) Iterative automated record linkage using mixture models. J Am Stat Assoc 96(453):32–41
Li P, Dong XL, Maurino A, Srivastava D (2011) Linking temporal records. The VLDB conference was in Seattle, WA. In: Proceedings of the VLDB endowment, Seattle, vol 4, issue 11
Newcombe H, Kennedy J, Axford S, James A (1959) Automatic linkage of vital records. Science 130(3381):954–959
On BW, Koudas N, Lee D, Srivastava D (2007) Group linkage. In: IEEE international conference on data engineering, Istanbul, pp 496–505
Ramadan B, Christen P, Liang H, Gayler RW (2015) Dynamic sorted neighborhood indexing for real time entity resolution. ACM J Data Inf Qual 6(4):15
Vatsalan D, Christen P, Verykios VS (2013) A taxonomy of privacy-preserving record linkage techniques. Elsevier Inf Syst 38(6):946–969
Winkler WE (1988) Using the EM algorithm for weight computation in the Fellegi-Sunter model of record linkage. The American Statistical Association that is located in Alexandria, VA publishes the proceedings. In: Proceedings of the section on survey research methods, New Orleans, Washington, pp 667–671
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this entry
Cite this entry
Christen, P., Winkler, W.E. (2016). Record Linkage. In: Sammut, C., Webb, G. (eds) Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7502-7_712-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7502-7_712-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7502-7
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Computer SciencesReference Module Computer Science and Engineering
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Record Linkage- Published:
- 25 March 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7502-7_712-2
-
Original
Record Linkage- Published:
- 17 June 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7502-7_712-1