Encyclopedia of Biometrics

2015 Edition
| Editors: Stan Z. Li, Anil K. Jain

Biometric Sample Synthesis

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7488-4_1

Synonyms

Artificial biometrics; Artificial digital biometrics; Artificial image biometrics; Intermediate biometrics; Synthetic biometrics

Definition

Biometric sample synthesis is the computer generation of simulated digital biometric data using parametric models. Parametric models are in general the computer creation steps derived from the empirical analysis of digitized biometric patterns or mathematical equations from the physics of the biometric sample’s creation.

Introduction

Biometric sample synthesis is the art and science of creating artificial digital biometrics that mimic real digital biometric samples. Researchers involved in the creation of synthetic biometric samples may have any number of possible noble goals; included in these may be striving for a fundamental understanding of the factors that affect the digitization process of real human biometric samples for a specific type of biometric sensor, attempting to improve or test computer algorithms used in biometric security...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    N.M. Orlans, D.J. Buettner, J. Marques, A survey of synthetic biometrics: capabilities and benefits, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IC-AI’04), Las Vegas, Los Angeles, vol. 1, 2004, pp. 499–505Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D.P. Greenberg et al., A framework for realistic image synthesis, in Computer Graphics Proceedings of SIGGRAPH, Los Angeles, vol. 1 (Los Angeles, 1997), pp. 477–494Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D.J. Buettner, N.M. Orlans, A taxonomy for physics based synthetic biometric models, in Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE Workshop on Automatic Identification Technologies (AUTOID’05), Buffalo, vol. 1, 2005, pp. 499–505Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Daugman, The importance of being random: statistical principles of iris recognition. Pattern Recognit. 36, 279–291 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A.J. Mansfield, J.L. Wayman, Best practices in testing and reporting performance of biometric devices version 2.01. Centre for Mathematics and Scientific Computing, National Physical Laboratory (NPL Report CMSC 14/02):10 (2002), http://www.npl.co.uk/upload/pdf/biometrics_bestprac_v2_1.pdf
  6. 6.
    Department of Defense Office of the Inspector General (Information Technology Management), Terrorism Information Awareness Program (D-2004-033), Dec 2003Google Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    C. Roberts, Biometric attack vectors and defences. Comput. Secur. 26(1), 14–256 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Murphy, H. Bray, Face recognition devices failed in test at Logan. The Boston Globe, http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2003/09/03/face_recognition_devices_failed_in_test_at_logan. Accessed 3 Sept 2003

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Aerospace CorporationEl SegundoUSA