Adjusted Inference for the Spatial Scan Statistic

  • Alexandre C. L. Almeida
  • Anderson R. Duarte
  • Luiz H. Duczmal
  • Fernando L. P. Oliveira
  • Ricardo H. C. Takahashi
  • Ivair R. Silva
Living reference work entry

Abstract

A modification is proposed to the usual inference test of the Kulldorff’s spatial scan statistic, incorporating additional information about the size of the most likely cluster found. A new modified inference question is answered: what is the probability that the null hypothesis is rejected for the original observed cases map with a most likely cluster of size known, taking into account only those most likely clusters of same size found under null hypothesis? A practical procedure is provided to make more accurate inferences about the most likely cluster found by the spatial scan statistic.

Keywords

Data-driven Size cluster adjusted inference Scan statistic Cluster detection Kulldorf’s statistics 

References

  1. Abrams AM, Kleinman K, Kulldorff M (2010) Gumbel based p-value approximations for spatial scan statistics. Int J Health Geograph 9:61 (online version)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almeida ACL, Duarte AR, Duczmal LH, Oliveira FLP, Takahachi RHC (2011) Data-driven inference for spatial scan statistic. Int J Health Geogr 10(47):1–8Google Scholar
  3. Barnard GA (1963) Discussion of Professor Bartlett’s paper. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 25(1963), 294Google Scholar
  4. Birnbaum Z (1974) Computers and unconventional test-statistics. In: Proschan F, Serfling RJ (eds) Reliability and biometry. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, pp 441–458Google Scholar
  5. Cancado ALF, Duarte AR, Duczmal L, Ferreira SJ, Fonseca CM, Gontijo ECDM (2010) Penalized likelihood and multi-objective spatial scans for the detection and inference of irregular clusters. Int J Health Geogr 9:55 (online version)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cançado ALF, da Silva CQ, da Silva MF (2014) A spatial scan statistic for zero-inflated poisson process. Environ Ecol Stat 21(4):627–650MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dematteï C, Molinari N, Daurès JP (2007) Arbitrarily shaped multiple spatial cluster detection for case event data. Comput Stat Data Anal 51:3931–3945MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Duarte AR, Duczmal L, Ferreira SJ, Cancado ALF (2010) Internal cohesion and geometric shape of spatial clusters. Environ Ecol Stat 17:203–229MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duczmal L, Assuncao R (2004) A simulated annealing strategy for the detection of arbitrarily shaped spatial clusters. Comput Stat Data Anal 45:269–286MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Duczmal L, Duarte AR, Tavares R (2009) Extensions of the scan statistic for the detection and inference of spatial clusters. In: Balakrishnan N, Glaz J (eds) Scan statistics. Birkhäuser, Boston/Basel/Berlin, pp 157–182Google Scholar
  11. Dwass M (1957a) Modified randomization tests for nonparametric hypotheses. Ann Math Stat 28:181–187MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Hope A (1968) A simplified monte carlo significance test procedure. J R Stat Soc 30B:582–598MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Jung I, Park G (2015) p-value approximations for spatial scan statistics using extreme value distributions. Stat Med 34(3):504–514MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kulldorff M (1997) A spatial scan statistic. Commun Stat-Theory Methods 26(6):1481–1496MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Kulldorff M (2001) Prospective time periodic geographical disease surveillance using a scan statistic. J R Stat Soc Ser A 164(1):61–72MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Kulldorff M, Nagarwalla N (1995) Spatial disease clusters: detection and inference. Stat Med 14:799–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kulldorff M, Huang L, Pickle L, Duczmal L (2006) An elliptic spatial scan statistic. Stat Med 25:3929–3943MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lawson A (2001) Statistical methods in spatial epidemiology. In: Lawson A (ed) Large scale: surveillance. Wiley, London, pp 197–206Google Scholar
  19. Naus JI (1965) Clustering of random points in two dimensions. Biometrika 52:263–267MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Naus JI, Wallenstein S (2004) Multiple window and cluster size scan procedures. Methodol Comput Appl Probab 6(4):389–400MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Silva I (2015) Composite sequential monte carlo test for post-market vaccine safety surveillance. Stat Med 35(9):1441–1453MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Silva I, Assuncao R, Costa M (2009) Power of the sequential monte carlo test. Seq Anal 28(2): 163–174MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Soltani AR, Aboukhamseen SM (2015) An alternative cluster detection test in spatial scan statistics. Commun Stat Theory Methods 44(8):1592–1601MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Wu TL, Glaz J (2015) A new adaptive procedure for multiple window scan statistics. Comput Stat Data Anal 82:164–172MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhang T, Zhang Z, Lin G (2012) Spatial scan statistics with overdispersion. Stat Med 31(8): 762–774MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexandre C. L. Almeida
    • 1
  • Anderson R. Duarte
    • 2
  • Luiz H. Duczmal
    • 3
  • Fernando L. P. Oliveira
    • 2
  • Ricardo H. C. Takahashi
    • 4
  • Ivair R. Silva
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Physics and MathematicsUniversidade Federal de São João del-ReiOuro BrancoBrazil
  2. 2.Department of StatisticsUniversidade Federal de Ouro PretoOuro PretoBrazil
  3. 3.Department of StatisticsUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisBelo HorizonteBrazil
  4. 4.Department of MathematicsUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisBelo HorizonteBrazil

Section editors and affiliations

  • Joseph Glaz
    • 1
  • Markos V. Koutras
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of StatisticsUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA
  2. 2.Dept. of Statistics and Insurance Science, University of PiraeusPiraeusGreece

Personalised recommendations