Encyclopedia of Database Systems

2018 Edition
| Editors: Ling Liu, M. Tamer Özsu

XML Benchmarks

  • Denilson Barbosa
  • Ioana Manolescu
  • Jeffrey Xu Yu
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8265-9_789

Definition

An XML benchmark is a specification of a set of meaningful and relevant tasks, intended to assess the functionality and/or performance of an XML processing tool or system. The benchmark must specify the following: (i) a deterministic workload, consisting of a set of XML documents and/or a procedure for obtaining these and a set of operations to be performed; (ii) detailed rules for executing the workload and making the measurements; (iii) the metrics used to report the results of the benchmark; and (iv) standard ways of interpreting the results.

Historical Background

XML has quickly become the preferred format for representing and exchanging data on the Web age. The level of acceptance of XML is astonishing, especially when one considers that this technology was introduced only in 1997. XML is an enabling technology with applications in virtually all domains of information processing. At the time of writing, XML is widely used in content distribution on the Web (e.g., RSS...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    Barbosa D, Mendelzon AO. Declarative generation of synthetic XML data. Softw Pract Exper. 2006;36(10):1051–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Böhme T, Rahm E. XMach-1: a benchmark for XML data management. In: Proceedings of German Database Conference. Berlin: Springer; 2001. p. 264–73. Multi-user evaluation of XML data Management Systems with XMach-1. LNCS, vol. 2590, 2003. p. 148–59.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Financial Information Exchange Protocol. FIXML 4.4 Schema Version Guide. Available at: http://www.fixprotocol.org.
  4. 4.
    Gray J. 1993, The Benchmark handbook for database and transaction systems. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann. ISBN 1–55860–292–5.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    IBM XML Generator. Available at: http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/xmlgenerator. 2007.
  6. 6.
    Lu H, Yu JX, Wang G, Zheng S, Jiang H, Yu G, Zhou A. What makes the differences: benchmarking XML database implementations. ACM Trans Internet Technol. 2005;5(1):154–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nicola M, Kogan I, Schiefer B. An XML transaction processing benchmark. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data; 2007. p. 937–48.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Runapongsa K, Patel JM, Jagadish HV, Chen Y, Al-Khalifa S. The Michigan benchmark: towards XML query performance diagnostics. Inf Syst. 2006;31(2):73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schmidt A, Waas F, Kersten ML, Carey MJ, Manolescu I, Busse R. XMark: a benchmark for XML data management. In: Proceedings of 28th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases; 2002. p. 974–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yao BB, Özsu MT, Khandelwal N. XBench benchmark and performance testing of XML DBMSs. In: Proceedings of 20th International Conference on Data Engineering; 2004. p. 621–33.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Denilson Barbosa
    • 1
  • Ioana Manolescu
    • 2
  • Jeffrey Xu Yu
    • 3
  1. 1.University of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  2. 2.INRIA Saclay–Îlle de FranceOrsayFrance
  3. 3.Department of Systems Engineering and Engineering ManagementThe Chinese University of Hong KongHong KongChina

Section editors and affiliations

  • Sihem Amer-Yahia
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire d'Informatique de GrenobleCNRS and LIGGrenobleFrance