Encyclopedia of Database Systems

2018 Edition
| Editors: Ling Liu, M. Tamer Özsu

XML Tuple Algebra

  • Ioana Manolescu
  • Yannis Papakonstantinou
  • Vasilis Vassalos
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8265-9_777

Synonyms

Relational algebra for XML; XML algebra

Definition

An XML tuple-based algebra operates on a domain that consists of sets of tuples whose attribute values are items, i.e., atomic values or XML elements (and hence, possibly, XML trees). Operators receive one or more sets of tuples and produce a set, list or bag of tuples of items. It is common that the algebra has special operators for converting XML inputs into instances of the domain and vice versa. XML tuple-based algebras, as is also the case with relational algebras, have been extensively used in query processing and optimization [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10].

Historical Background

The use of tuple-based algebras for the efficient set-at-a-time processing of XQuery queries follows a typical pattern in database query processing. Relational algebras are the most typical vehicle for query optimization. Tuple-oriented algebras for object-oriented queries had also been formulated and have a close resemblance to the described...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    Arion A., Benzaken V., Manolescu I., Papakonstantinou Y., and Vijay R. Algebra-based identification of tree patterns in XQuery. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Flexible Query Answering Systems; 2006. p. 13–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beeri C. Tzaban Y. SAL: an algebra for semistructured data and XML. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD Workshop on the Web and Databases; 1999. p. 37–42.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cluet S. and Moerkotte G. Nested Queries in Object Bases. Technical report; 1995.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deutsch A., Papakonstantinou Y., and Xu Y. The NEXT logical framework for XQuery. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases; 2004. p. 168–79.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Michiels P., Mihaila G.A., Siméon J. Put a tree pattern in your algebra. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Data Engineering; 2007. p. 246–55.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Papakonstantinou Y, Borkar VR, Orgiyan M, Stathatos K, Suta L, Vassalos V, Velikhov P. XML queries and algebra in the Enosys integration platform. Data Knowl. Eng. 2003;44(3):299–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Re C., Siméon J., and Fernández M. A complete and efficient algebraic compiler for XQuery. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Data Engineering; 2006. p. 14.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    The XQuery Language. 2004. www.w3.org/TR/xquery.
  9. 9.
    XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Data Model. www.w3.org/TR/xpath-datamodel.
  10. 10.
    XQuery 1.0 Formal Semantics. www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-xquery-semantics.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ioana Manolescu
    • 1
  • Yannis Papakonstantinou
    • 2
  • Vasilis Vassalos
    • 3
  1. 1.INRIA Saclay–Îlle de FranceOrsayFrance
  2. 2.University of California-San DiegoLa JollaUSA
  3. 3.Athens University of Economics and BusinessAthensGreece

Section editors and affiliations

  • Sihem Amer-Yahia
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire d'Informatique de GrenobleCNRS and LIGGrenobleFrance