Encyclopedia of Database Systems

2018 Edition
| Editors: Ling Liu, M. Tamer Özsu

Scientific Workflows

  • Bertram Ludäscher
  • Shawn Bowers
  • Timothy McPhillips
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8265-9_1471

Synonyms

Grid workflow; In silico experiment

Definition

A scientific workflow is the description of a process for accomplishing a scientific objective, usually expressed in terms of tasks and their dependencies. Typically, scientific workflow tasks are computational steps for scientific simulations or data analysis steps. Common elements or stages in scientific workflows are acquisition, integration, reduction, visualization, and publication (e.g., in a shared database) of scientific data. The tasks of a scientific workflow are organized (at design time) and orchestrated (at runtime) according to dataflow and possibly other dependencies as specified by the workflow designer. Workflows can be designed visually, e.g., using block diagrams, or textually using a domain-specific language.

Historical Background

Workflows have a long history in the database community and in business process modeling, in which case they are sometimes called business workflowsto distinguish them from...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    Bonner AJ, Shrufi A, Rozen S. LabFlow-1: a database benchmark for high-throughput workflow management. In: Advances in Database Technology, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Extending Database Technology; 1996. p. 463–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fox GC, Gannon D, editors. Concurrency and computation: practice and experience. Spec Issue Workflow Grid Systems. 2006;18(10):1009–1019.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gil Y, Deelman W, Ellisman W, Fahringer T, Fox G, Gannon D, Goble C, Livny M, Moreau L, Myers J. Examining the challenges of scientific workflows. Computer. 2007;40(12):24–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Houstis E, Gallopoulos E, Bramley R, Rice J. Problem-solving environments for computational science. IEEE Comput Sci Eng. 1997;4(3):18–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ioannidis YE, Livny M. MOOSE: modeling objects in a simulation environment. In: IFIP Congress, Ritter GX, editors. North-Holland; 1989. p. 821–6.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ioannidis YE, Livny M, Gupta S, Ponnekanti N. ZOO: a desktop experiment management environment. In: Proceedings of the 22th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases; 1996. p. 274–85.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ludäscher B, Goble C, editors. ACM SIGMOD Rec. 2005;34(3):44–9. Special Issue on Scientific Workflows.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Medeiros CB, Vossen G, Weske M. WASA: a workflow-based architecture to support scientific database applications. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications; 1995. p. 574–83.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nakagawa AS. LIMS: implementation and management. Cambridge: The Royal Society of Chemistry, Thomas Graham House, The Science Park, CB4 4WF; 1994.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shoshani A, Olken F, Wong HKT. Characteristics of scientific databases. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases; 1984. p. 147–60.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Taylor I, Deelman E, Gannon D, Shields M, editors. Workflows for e-Science: scientific workflows for grids. Berlin: Springer; 2007.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wainer J, Weske M, Vossen G, Medeiros CB. Scientific workflow systems. In: Proceedings of the NSF Workshop on Workflow and Process Automation in Information Systems: State of the Art and Future Directions; 1996.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wiener JL, Ioannidis YE. A moose and a fox can aid scientists with data management problems. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Database Programming Languages; 1993. p. 376–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yu J, Buyya R. A taxonomy of scientific workflow systems for grid computing. ACM SIGMOD Rec. 2005;34(3):44–9. Special Issue on Scientific Workflows.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bertram Ludäscher
    • 1
  • Shawn Bowers
    • 1
  • Timothy McPhillips
    • 1
  1. 1.University of California-DavisDavisUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Barbara Pernici
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. di Elettronica e InformazionePolitecnico di MilanoMilanItaly