Encyclopedia of Database Systems

2018 Edition
| Editors: Ling Liu, M. Tamer Özsu

Image Retrieval and Relevance Feedback

  • Michel Crucianu
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8265-9_1016

Definition

Relevance feedback is a means of refining a query in an information retrieval system by asking the user to specify how relevant each result of the query is. An image retrieval session relying on relevance feedback is interactive and iterative. The session is divided into several consecutive rounds. At every round, the user provides feedback regarding the current retrieval results, usually by qualifying the returned images as either “relevant” or “irrelevant”; from this feedback, the system attempts to better identify the target of the user and to return improved results. A relevance feedback mechanism should maximize the relevance of the results while minimizing the amount of interaction between the user and the system.

Historical Background

In the early years of content-based image retrieval (CBIR), query by visual example (QBVE) was a prevailing paradigm. To support QBVE, an image retrieval system must first extract, during an off-line phase, a description in terms of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    Cox IJ, Miller ML, Omohundro SM, Yianilos PN. An optimized interaction strategy for Bayesian relevance feedback. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; 1998. p. 553–8.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ferecatu M, Crucianu M, Boujemaa N. Retrieval of difficult image classes using SVM-based relevance feedback. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGMM International Workshop on Multimedia Information Retrieval; 2004. p. 23–30.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ferecatu M, Geman D. Interactive search for image categories by mental matching. In: Proceedings of the 11th IEEE Conference Computer Vision; 2007. p. 1–8.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heisterkamp DR, Peng J. Kernel VA-files for relevance feedback retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Multimedia Databases; 2003. p. 48–54.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Khan A, Yanki P, Dimcheva B, Kossmann D. Towards indexing functions: answering scalar product queries. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data; 2014. p. 241–52.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kurita T, Kato T. Learning of personal visual impression for image database systems. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference Document Analysis and Recognition; 1993. p. 547–52.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu W, Wang J, Mu Y, Kumar S, Chang S. Compact hyperplane hashing with bilinear functions. In: Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Machine Learning; 2012.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lu Y, Hu C, Zhu X, Zhang H-J, Yang Q. A unified framework for semantics and feature based relevance feedback in image retrieval systems. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Conference on Multimedia; 2000. p. 31–7.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Meilhac C, Nastar C. Relevance feedback and category search in image databases. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems; 1999. p. 512–7.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Panda N, Goh K, Chang E. Active learning in very large databases. Multimed Tools Appl. 2006;31(3):249–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Porkaew K, Chakrabarti K. Query refinement for multimedia similarity retrieval in MARS. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (Part 1); 1999. p. 235–8.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rui Y, Huang TS, Ortega M, Mehrotra S. Relevance feedback: a power tool in interactive content-based image retrieval. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Tech. 1998;8(5):644–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schölkopf B, Smola A. Learning with Kernels. Cambridge: MIT; 2002.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sclaroff S, Taycher L, Cascia ML. Image rover: a content-based image browser for the world wide web. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Content-Based Access of Image and Video Libraries; 1997. p. 2–9.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tong S, Chang E. Support vector machine active learning for image retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on Multimedia; 2001. p. 107–18.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhou XS, Huang TS. Relevance feedback for image retrieval: a comprehensive review. Multimedia Systems. 2003;8(6):536–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Conservatoire National des Arts et MétiersParisFrance