Counterfeiting Models: Mathematical/Economic
Counterfeiting and piracy are illicit activities infringing IPR (intellectual property rights). The market for counterfeit can be divided into two important submarkets. In the primary market, consumers purchase counterfeit products believing they have purchased genuine articles (deceptive counterfeiting). In the secondary market, consumers knowingly buy counterfeit products (nondeceptive counterfeiting).
Counterfeiting has, obviously, consequences on genuine producers and consumers; nevertheless, it can have general socioeconomic effects.
There is a considerable body of theoretical and empirical literature on the mechanisms of counterfeit trade and on the economic and social effects of counterfeiting. A number of the methodological papers are undertaken within the framework of operations research and game theory.
KeywordsCounterfeiting Deceptive counterfeiting Nondeceptive counterfeiting Piracy Imitation Modeling counterfeiting Fighting counterfeiting Game Theory IPR
- Abalos RJ (1985) Commercial trademark counterfeiting in the United States, the third world and beyond: American and international attempts to stem the tide. Boston Coll Third World Law J 5:151–182Google Scholar
- Chacharkar DY (2013) Brand imitation, counterfeiting and consumers. Centre for Consumer Studies Indian Institute of Public Administration, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
- Di Liddo A (2015) Does counterfeiting benefit genuine manufacturer? The role of production costs. Eur J Law Econ 3:1–45Google Scholar
- Eisend M, Schuchert-Güler P (2006) Explaining counterfeit purchases: a review and preview. Acad Mark Sci Rev 10:1–25Google Scholar
- Grossman GM, Shapiro C (1988a) Counterfeit-product trade. Am Econ Rev 78:59–75Google Scholar
- ICC (2017.) https://cdn.iccwbo.org/content/uploads/sites/3/2017/02/ICC-BASCAP-Frontier-report-2016.pdf. Last accessed 30 Mar 2017
- OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) (2008) The economic impact of counterfeiting and piracy. OECD Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
- OECD/EUIPO (2016) Trade in counterfeit and pirated goods: mapping the economic impact. OECD Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Yao JT (2005) How a luxury monopolist might benefit from a stringent counterfeit monitoring regime. Int J Bus Econ 4:177–192Google Scholar