Encyclopedia of Law and Economics

2019 Edition
| Editors: Alain Marciano, Giovanni Battista Ramello

Commercial Sex and Health

  • Giovanni ImmordinoEmail author
  • Francesco F. Russo
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_688

Abstract

The spread of HIV/AIDS and of other sexually transmittable infections is affected by the legal regime governing prostitution. In this entry we briefly discuss a theory of commercial sex, public intervention, and the health consequences. We present some evidence and the main motivations for unprotected commercial sex in addition to examining the theoretical and empirical effects of different policies for the health consequences of commercial sex.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bhave G, Lindan CP, Hudes ES, Desai S, Wagle U, Tripathi SP, Mandel JS (1995) Impact of and intervention on HIV, sexually transmitted diseases, and condom use among sex workers in Bombay, India. AIDS 9(Suppl 1):S21–S30Google Scholar
  2. Cameron S, Collins A (2003) Estimates of a model of male participation in the market for female heterosexual prostitution services. Eur J Law Econ 16:271–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gertler P, Shah M (2011) Sex work and infection: what’s law enforcement got to do with it? J Law Econ 54(4):811–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gertler P, Shah M, Bertozzi SM (2005) Risky business: the market for unprotected prostitution. J Polit Econ 113:518–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Immordino G, Russo FF (2015a) Regulating prostitution: a health risk approach. J Public Econ 121:14–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Immordino G, Russo FF (2015b) Laws and stigma: the case of prostitution. Eur J Law Econ 40:209–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Immordino G, Russo FF (2016) Optimal prostitution policy. In: Cunningham S, Shah M (eds) Handbook of the economics of prostitution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 332–347Google Scholar
  8. Rao V, Gupta I, Lokshin M, Jana S (2003) Sex workers and the cost of safe sex: the compensating differential for condom use among Calcutta prostitutes. J Dev Econ 71:585–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and StatisticsUniversity of Naples Federico II and CSEFNaplesItaly