Encyclopedia of Law and Economics

2019 Edition
| Editors: Alain Marciano, Giovanni Battista Ramello

REACH Legislation

  • Sylvain Béal
  • Marc DeschampsEmail author
  • Philippe Solal
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_674

Abstract

Since 13 December 2006, the European Union is in a phase of implementation of a new harmonized legislative framework in the field of chemical industry: the REACH regulation (an acronym for Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemicals). From a law and economics perspective, a large set of questions emerge with this regulation. In our entry, we will only shed some light on those which have already been analyzed, such as competition, data sharing, innovation, and socioeconomic analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ambec S, Cohen MA, Elgie S, Lanoie P (2013) The Porter hypothesis at 20: can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Rev Environ Econ Policy 7(1):2–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arfaoui N, Brouillat E, Saint-Jean M (2014) Policy design and technological substitution: investigating the REACH regulation in an agent-based model. Ecol Econ 107:347–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Béal S, Deschamps M, Ravix J, Sautel O (2010) Les informations exigées par la législation REACH : une analyse du partage des coûts. Rev Econ Polit 120:991–1014Google Scholar
  4. Béal S, Deschamps M, Ravix J, Sautel O (2011) La mise en place de la législation européenne REACH : une analyse des effets anticoncurrentiels. Revue de l’OFCE 118:113–128Google Scholar
  5. Béal S, Deschamps M (2016) On compensation schemes for data sharing within the European REACH legislation. Eur J Law Econ 41:157–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Béal S, Deschamps M, Solal P (2016) Comparable axiomatizations of two allocation rules for cooperative games with transferable utility and their subclass of data games. J Publ Econ Theory 18:992–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergkamp L (ed) (2013) The European union REACH regulation for chemicals: law and practice. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Dehez P, Tellone D (2013) Data games: sharing public goods with exclusion. J Publ Econ Theory 15:654–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. ECHA (2011) Guidance on the preparation of socio-economic analysis as part of an application for authorisation. Version 1, January, 260 pGoogle Scholar
  10. ECHA (2016) Guidance on data sharing. Version 3, November, 200 pGoogle Scholar
  11. EU Commission (2001) Strategy for a future chemicals policy-white paper. COM(2001) 88 final, 27 February, Brussels, 32 pGoogle Scholar
  12. EU Commission (2013) General report on REACH. COM(2013) 49 final, 5 February, Brussels, 15 pGoogle Scholar
  13. Gollier C, Jullien B, Treich N (2000) Scientific progress and irreversibility. An economic interpretation of the precautionary principle. J Public Econ 75:229–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schuseil Ph (2013) Les études d’impact du règlement REACH. Rapport pour les Cahiers de l’évaluation du Trésor, 126 pGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CRESE EA3190Université Bourgogne Franche-ComtéBesançonFrance
  2. 2.CNRS UMR 5824 GATEUniversité de Saint-EtienneSaint-EtienneFrance