Encyclopedia of Law and Economics

2019 Edition
| Editors: Alain Marciano, Giovanni Battista Ramello

Creative Commons and Culture

  • Joëlle FarchyEmail author
  • Pierre-Carl Langlais
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_673

Abstract

Inspired by a specific philosophy, the “free” movement first emerged in the software and academic research fields and has since enjoyed considerable economic success. In the field of culture, initiatives are born in a specific intellectual context, which we begin by briefly reviewing, and the revolutionary ambitions of pioneers have evolved with the development of Creative Commons licenses. These licenses, which originally were but one form of free license among many, have gradually gained a monopolistic position for numerous reasons, and in their 15 years of existence, their use has greatly increased. We present in this chapter an initial assessment of the use of these licenses based on the scattered statistical data that is available. This appraisal provides an overview in terms of the works available, the varied practices of creators and consumers of works, and the variety of economic models.

Keywords

Free License Free Culture Commons Intellectual Property Web Communities 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bazen S, Bouvard L, Zimmermann J-B (2014) Jamendo et les Artistes: Un nouveau Modèle pour l’Industrie Musicale?Google Scholar
  2. Benkler Y (2002) Coase’s penguin or Linux and the nature of the firm. Yale Law J 112(Winter):369–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cheliotis G (2009) From open source to open content: organization, licensing and decision processes in open cultural production. Decis Support Syst 47(3):229–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheliotis G, Chik W, Ankit G, Tayi KG (2007) Taking stock of the creative commons experiment monitoring the use of creative commons licenses and evaluating its implications for the future of creative commons and for copyright law. Singapore Management UniversityGoogle Scholar
  5. Creative Commons (2009) Defining “noncommercial” (Unsigned collective report)Google Scholar
  6. Creative Commons (2015) State of the commons. https://stateof.creativecommons.org/2015/data.html
  7. De Filippi P & Ramade I (2013) Les licences Creative Commons: Libre Choix ou Choix du Libre? In Christophe Masutti Camille Paloque-Berges Benjamin Jean (dir.), Histoire et cultures du Libre, Framabook, 2013, pp 341–378Google Scholar
  8. Dobusch L, Quack S (2008) Epistemic communities and social movements: transnational dynamics in the case of creative commons. Social Science Research Network, RochesterGoogle Scholar
  9. Erickson K, Heald PJ, Homberg F, Kretschmer M & Mendis D (2015) Copyright and the value of the public domain: an empirical assessment. Report commissioned by the Intellectual Property Office. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/561543/Copyright-and-the-public-domain.pdf
  10. Foray D, Thoron S, Zimmermann J-B (2006) Open software: knowledge openness and cooperation in cyberspace. In: Brousseau E, Curien N (eds) Internet and digital economics. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  11. Himanen P (2001) L’éthique hacker et l’esprit de l’ère de l’information. Exils, ParisGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim M (2007) The creative commons and copyright protection in the digital era: uses of creative commons licenses. J Comput-Mediat Commun 13(1):187–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Latonero M, Sinnreich A (2014) Tracking configurable culture from the margins to the mainstream. J Comput-Mediat Commun 19(4):798–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lessig L (2009) Remix: making art and commerce thrive in the hybrid economy. Penguin Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Lessig L (2001) The future of ideas: the fate of the commons in a connected world. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Loren LP (2007) Building a reliable semicommons of creative works: enforcement of creative commons licenses and limited abandonment of copyright. George Mason L Rev 14:271–328Google Scholar
  17. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Russi G (2011) Creative commons, CC-plus, and hybrid intermediaries: a Stakeholder’s perspective. Int Manag Rev 7:103Google Scholar
  19. Turner F (2006) From counterculture to cyberculture – Stewart brand, the whole earth network, and the rise of digital utopianism. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Varian HR (2005) Copying and copyright. J Econ Prospect 19(2):121–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wechsler J (2010) Openness in the music business – how record labels and artists may profit from reducing control. PhD dissertation, Technical University of MunichGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EconomicsPantheon-Sorbonne University Paris 1ParisFrance
  2. 2.Université Paris IV – SorbonneParisFrance