Encyclopedia of Law and Economics

2019 Edition
| Editors: Alain Marciano, Giovanni Battista Ramello

Prisons

  • Paolo BuonannoEmail author
  • Juan F. Vargas
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_595

Synonyms

Definition

Prison (or incarceration) is one of the most important forms of sanction in many modern criminal system. Incarceration may impact the overall level of crime and affect criminal behavior through several channels: incapacitation, deterrence (general deterrence and specific deterrence), rehabilitation. Understanding whether individuals respond to any of the effects outlined above is a crucial aspect for the design of effective crime reduction policies.

Introduction

The most important form of criminal sanction in many modern criminal justice systems is incarceration. The utilitarian theory of punishment developed by Cesare Beccaria (1764) and Jeremy Bentham (1789) defines the extent to which incarceration or imprisonment may be considered beneficial for society as a whole. The utilitarian rationale justifies any form of punishment, under the condition that the associated benefits are higher than the implied costs. In...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Barbarino A, Mastrobuoni G (2014) The incapacitation effect of incarceration: evidence from several Italian collective pardons. Am Econ J Econ Pol 6(1):1–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bayer P, Hjalmarsson R, Pozen D (2009) Building criminal capital behind bars: Peer effects in juvenile corrections. Q J Econ 124(1):105–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beccaria C (1764) On crime and punishmentsGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker GS (1968) Crime and punishment: an economic approach. J Polit Econ 76(2):169–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bentham J (1789) An introduction to the principles of morals and legislationGoogle Scholar
  6. Buonanno P, Raphael S (2013) Incarceration and incapacitation: evidence from the 2006 Italian collective pardon. Am Econ Rev 103(6):2437–2465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Drago F, Galbiati R (2012) Indirect effects of a policy altering criminal behavior: evidence from the Italian prison experiment. Am Econ J Appl Econ 4(2):199–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Drago F, Galbiati R, Vertova P (2009) The deterrent effects of prison: evidence from a natural experiment. J Polit Econ 117(2):257–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Drago F, Galbiati R, Vertova P (2011) Prison conditions and recidivism. Am Law Econ Rev 13(1):103–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Giedd JN (2004) Structural magnetic resonance imaging of the adolescent brain. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1021(1):77–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Johnson R, Raphael S (2012) How much crime reduction does the marginal prisoner buy? J Law Econ 55(2):275–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Katz L, Levitt SD, Shustorovich E (2003) Prison conditions, capital punishment, and deterrence. Am Law Econ Rev 5:318–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kessler D, Levitt SD (1999) Using sentence enhancements to distinguish between deterrence and incapacitation. J Law Econ 42(1):343–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kuziemko I (2007) Going Off Parole: how the elimination of discretionary prison release affects the social cost of crime. Working paper no 13 380 (September), NBER, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  15. Levitt, SD. (1996). The Effect of Prison Population Size on Crime Rates: Evidence from Prison Overcrowding Litigation. Q J Econ, 111(2), pp. 319–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liedka RV, Piehl AM, Useem B (2006) The crime-control effect of incarceration: does scale matter? Criminol Public Policy 5:245–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marvell TB, Moody CE Jr (1994) Prison population growth and crime reduction. J Quant Criminol 10(2):109–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maurin E, Ouss A (2009) Sentence reductions and recidivism: lessons from the Bastille Day quasi experiment. IZA discussion paper no 3 990 (February), Inst. Study Labor, BonnGoogle Scholar
  19. Miles TJ, Ludwig J (2007) The silence of the lambdas: deterring incapacitation research. J Quant Criminol 23(4):287–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Owens EG (2009) More time, less crime? Estimating the incapacitative effect of sentence enhancements. J Law Econ 52(3):551–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tobón S (2017) Prison conditions, human capital and recidivism: evidence from an expansion in prison capacity, documento CEDE Universidad de Los Andes, no 2017–7Google Scholar
  22. Vollaard B (2013) Preventing crime through selective incapacitation. Econ J 123(567):262–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management, Economics and Quantitative MethodsUniversity of BergamoBergamoItaly
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversidad del RosarioBogotaColombia