Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Harmonization: Legal Enforcement

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Encyclopedia of Law and Economics

  • 42 Accesses

Abstract

While harmonization and convergence of national substantive laws are well advanced in the European Union, a similar convergence and harmonization of the procedural rules and institutional frameworks has not taken place. The implementation, supervision, and enforcement of EU law are left to the Member States in accordance with the so-called national procedural and institutional autonomy. This “procedural competence” of the Member States means that the Member States have to provide remedies and procedures governing actions intended to ensure the enforcement of rights derived from EU law.

Harmonized substantive rules are implemented through diverging procedures and different kinds of enforcement bodies, but this decentralized enforcement challenges the coherent and uniform application of EU law. In an enforcement system where Member States apply divergent procedures, may impose a variety of sanctions and remedies administered by various actors the effectiveness of EU law, effective judicial protection and effective law administration may be at risk. This chapter analyzes the development of EU law concerning law enforcement and takes a critical look at the EU’s aim to harmonize the national procedural rules when EU law is enforced. It will examine the question of which legal basis can be used in order to harmonize procedural rules, whether harmonizing procedural rules would be more efficient than the existing legal diversity and the economics of harmonization will be applied to assess the top-down harmonization by the EU and comparative law, and economics is applied to evaluate the bottom-up voluntary harmonization of the Member States.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 819.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bakardjieva-Engelbrekt A (2009) Public and private enforcement of consumer law in central and Eastern Europe: institutional choice in the shadow of EU enlargement. In: Cafaggi F, Micklitz H-W (eds) New frontiers of consumer protection. The interplay between private and public enforcement. Intersentia, Antwerp, pp 47–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Balogh V, Cseres KJ (2013) Institutional design in Hungary: a case study of the unfair commercial practices directive. J Consum Policy 361:343–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cafaggi F, Micklitz H-W (2009) Introduction. In: Cafaggi F, Micklitz H-W (eds) New frontiers of consumer protection. The interplay between private and public enforcement. Intersentia, Antwerp, pp 1–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Cengiz F (2009) Regulation 1/2003 revisited. TILEC discussion paper no. 2009-042, 17

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase RH (1960) The problem of social cost. J Law Econ 3:1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cseres KJ (2013) Integrate or separate. Institutional design for the enforcement of competition law and consumer law. ACELG working paper 2013-01

    Google Scholar 

  • Cseres KJ, Schrauwen A (2013) Empowering consumer-citizens: changing rights or merely discourse? In: Schiek D (ed) The EU social and economic model after the global crisis: interdisciplinary perspectives. Ashgate, Farnham, pp 117–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Cseres KJ (2014a) Accession to the EU’s competition law regime: a law and governance approach. Yearb Antitrust Regul Stud 7(9):31–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Cseres KJ (2014b) The European competition network as experimentalist governance: the case of the CEECs, ECPR standing group on regulatory governance conference, Barcelona, 25–27 June 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • De Moor-van Vugt AJC (2011) Handhaving en toezicht in een Europese context. In: Pront-van Bommel S (ed) De consument en de andere kant van de elektriciteitsmarkt: inleidingen op het openingscongres van het Centrum voor Energievraagstukken Universiteit van Amsterdam op 27 januari 2010. Universiteit van Amsterdam, Centrum voor Energievraagstukken, Amsterdam, pp 62–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Delicostopoulos J (2003) Towards European procedural primacy in national legal systems. Eur Law J 9(5):599–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliantonio M (2009) The future of national procedural law in Europe: harmonisation vs. judge-made standards in the field of administrative justice. Electron J Comp Law 13(3):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Frédéric J (2001) Does the effectiveness of the EU network of competition authorities depend on a certain degree of homogeneity within its membership? In: Ehlermann CD, Atanasiu I (eds) European competition law annual 2000: the modernisation of EC antitrust policy. Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp 208–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauer C (2001) Does the effectiveness of the EU network of competition authorities require a certain degree of harmonisation of national procedures and sanctions? In: Ehlermann CD, Atanasiu I (eds) European competition law annual 2000: the modernisation of EC antitrust policy. Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp 187–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez F (2008) The harmonization of contract law through European rules: a law and economics perspective. Eur Rev Contract Law 4(2):89–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorecki P (2011) Economic regulation: recentralisation of power or improved quality of regulation? Econ Soc Rev 42:177–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlow C (2002) Voices of difference in a plural community. In: Beaumont P, Lyons C, Walker N (eds) Convergence and divergence in European public law. Hart Publishing, London, pp 199–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Jans JH, de Lange R, Prechal S, Widdershoven R (2007) Europeanisation of public law. Europa Law Publishing, Groningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Josselin J-M, Marciano A (2004) Federalism and subsidiarity in national and international contexts. In: Backhaus JG, Wagner RE (eds) Handbook of public finance. Springer Science & Business Media, United Kingdom, pp 477–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakouris CN (1997) Do the member states possess judicial procedural “autonomy”? Common Mark Law Rev 34:1389–1412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komesar NK (1994) Imperfect alternatives: choosing institutions in law, economics and public policy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Legrand P (2002) Public law, Europeanisation and convergence: can comparatists contribute? In: Beaumont P, Lyons C, Walker N (eds) Convergence and divergence in European public law. Hart Publishing, London, pp 225–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenaerts K, Arts D, Maselis I (2006) Procedural law of the European union. Sweet & Maxwell, UK, pp 1–002

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattei U (1994) Efficiency in legal transplants: an essay in comparative law and economics. Int Rev Law Econ 14:3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattei U, Antoniolli L, Rossato A (2000) Comparative law and economics. In: Bouckaert B, De Geest G (eds) Encyclopedia of law and economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • McCahery JA, Vermeulen EPM (2005) Does the European company prevent the ‘delaware-effect’? TILEC discussion paper no. 2005-010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=693421

  • Micklitz H (2009) Universal services: nucleus for a social European private law. EUI working paper law no. 2009/12

    Google Scholar 

  • Möllers TMJ, Heinemann A (eds) (2007) The enforcement of competition law in Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaides PH (2003) Preparing or accession to the EU: how to establish capacity for effective and credible application o EU rules. In: Cremona M (ed) The enlargement of the European union. OUP. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 43–78

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • North DC (1995) The new institutional economics and third world development. In: Harriss J, Hunter J, Lewis CM (eds) The new institutional economics and third world development. Routledge, London and New York, pp 17–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottow A (2012) Europeanization of the supervision of competitive markets. Eur Public Law 18(1):191–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Prechal S (1998) Community law in national courts: the lessons from Van Schijndel. Common Mark Law Rev 35:686

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich N (2007) Horizontal liability in EC law: hybridization of remedies for compensation in case of breaches of EC rights. Common Mark Law Rev 44:708

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarze J (1996) The Europeanization of national administrative law. In: Schwarze J (ed) Administrative law under European influence: on the convergence of the administrative laws of the EU member states. Sweet & Maxwell, London, p 832

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott C (2000) Accountability in the regulatory state. J Law Soc 27(1):38–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz J (2002) Participation and development: perspectives from the comprehensive development paradigm. Rev Dev Econ 6(2):163–182, 164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher M (2002) Delegation to independent regulatory agencies: pressures, functions and contextual mediation. West Eur Polit 25:125–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiebout CM (1956) A pure theory of local expenditures. J Polit Econ 64:416–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trstenjak V, Beysen E (2011) European consumer protection law: curia semper dabit remedium? Common Mark Law Rev 48:95–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Boom WH (2008) European tort law an integrated or compartmentalized approach? In: Vaquer A (ed) European private law beyond the common frame of reference – essays in honour of Reinhard Zimmermann. Europa Law Publishing, Groningen, pp 133–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bergh R (1994) The subsidiarity principle in European Community law: some insights from law and economics. Maastricht J Eur Comp Law 1:337–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bergh R (1996) Modem Industrial Organisation versus old-fashioned European competition law. Eur Compet Law Rev 7–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bergh RJ (1998) Subsidiarity as an economic demarcation principle and the emergence of European private law. Maastricht J Eur Comp Law 5(2):129–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bergh R (2002) Regulatory competition or harmonization of laws? Guidelines for the European regulator in the economics of harmonizing European law. In: Marciano A, Josselin J-M (eds) The economics of harmonizing European law. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 27–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bergh RJ, Camesasca PD (2001) European competition law and economics: a comparative perspective. Intersentia, Antwerpen

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gerven W (2000) Of rights, remedies and procedures. Common Mark Law Rev 37:502

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven M (2010) The ‘Constanzo Obligation’ and the principle of National Institutional Autonomy: supervision as a bridge to close the gap? Rev Eur Admin Law 3/1:23–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner G (2005) The virtues of diversity in European private law. In: Smits J (ed) The need for a European contract law; empirical and legal perspectives. Europa Law Publishing, Groningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson A (1978) Comparative law and legal change. Camb Law J 37:313–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Amsterdam Centre for European Law and Governance, Amsterdam Center for Law and Economics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Katalin J. Cseres

Authors
  1. Katalin J. Cseres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katalin J. Cseres .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. MRE and University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France

    Alain Marciano

  2. Faculté d’Economie, Université de Montpellier and LAMETA-UMR CNRS, Montpellier, France

    Alain Marciano

  3. DiGSPES, University of Eastern Piedmont, Alessandria, Italy

    Giovanni Battista Ramello

  4. IEL, Torino, Italy

    Giovanni Battista Ramello

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Cseres, K.J. (2019). Harmonization: Legal Enforcement. In: Marciano, A., Ramello, G.B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_567

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation