Encyclopedia of Law and Economics

2019 Edition
| Editors: Alain Marciano, Giovanni Battista Ramello

European Community Law

  • Klaus HeineEmail author
  • Anna Sting
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_562

Abstract

European Community law has evolved over the last 60 years as a process of European economic integration. European law has developed alongside the stages of economic integration in a reciprocal process, with euro-area Member States being close to total economic integration. However, economic integration has not been unhalted – political and economic realities have forced the EU to adapt to current developments and negotiate treaty amendments but sometimes also to act outside the Treaty framework. Other influences, such as interest groups, have also shaped the dynamics of interest groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Balassa B (1961) The theory of economic integration. Irwin, HomewoodGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldwin R (1989) The growth effects of 1992. Econ Policy 4:247–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldwin R, Wyplosz C (2012) The economics of European integration, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Cecchini-report (1988) The European challenge. Gower, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  5. Craig P, de Burca G (2011) EU law- text, cases and materials, 5th edn, Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Grauwe P (2012) The governance of a fragile eurozone. Aust Econ Rev 45(3):255–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eising R (2008) Interest groups in EU policy making. Living Rev Eur Gov 3:4–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. European parliament resolution of 30 March 1962, JO1962Google Scholar
  9. Fairhurst J (2012) Law of the European union law, 8th edn. Pearson, HarlowGoogle Scholar
  10. Follesdal A, Hix S (2005) Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU. European Governance papers (EUROGOV) C-05-02Google Scholar
  11. Hartley T (2014) The foundations of European union law, 8th edn, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Lenaerts K, Van Nuffel K (2011) European union law, 3rd edn. Sweet & Maxwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Majone G (1998) Europe’s ‘democratic deficit’: the question of standards. Eur Law J 4(1):5–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mongelli FP, Dorrucci E, Agur I (2005) What does European institutional integration tell us about trade integration? ECB occasional paper series 40Google Scholar
  15. Mueller DC (2003) Public choice III. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nugent N (2010) The government and politics of the European union, 7th edn. Palgrave MacMillan, BasingstokeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pierson P (1996) The path to European integration: a historical institutionalist analysis. Comp Polit Stud 29:123–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ricardo D (1817) On the principles of political economy and taxation. John Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Smith A (1776) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of Nations. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Tarr RD (2009) Customs union. In: Reinert KA, Rajan RS (eds) The Princeton encyclopedia of the world economy, vol 1. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 256–259Google Scholar
  21. Weingast B (1995) The economic role of political institutions: market-preserving federalism and economic development. J Law Econ Organ 20:1–31Google Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Chalmers D, Davies G, Monti G (2010) European union law, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Moravcsik A (2002) In defence of the democratic deficit: reassessing legitimacy in the European Union. J Common Mark Stud 40(4):603–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rotterdam Institute of Law and EconomicsErasmus School of Law, Erasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.International and European Union LawErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands