Skip to main content

Concentrated Ownership

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Encyclopedia of Law and Economics
  • 331 Accesses

Abstract

This entry summarizes the main theoretical contributions and empirical findings in relation to concentrated ownership from a law and economics perspective. The various forms of concentrated ownership are described as well as analyzed from the perspective of the legal protection of investors, especially minority shareholders. Concentrated ownership is associated with benefits and costs. Concentrated ownership may reduce agency costs by increased monitoring of top management. However, concentrated ownership may also provide dominating owners with private benefits of control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 819.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackert LF, Athanassakos G (2001) Visibility, institutional preferences and agency considerations. J Psychol Financ Markets 2:201–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand A, Irvine P, Puckett A, Venkataraman K (2013) Institutional trading and stock resiliency: evidence from the 2007–2009 financial crisis. J Financ Econ 108:773–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson RC, Reeb DM (2003) Founding-family ownership and firm performance. Evidence from the S&P 500. J Financ LVIII(3):1301–1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagat S, Black B, Blair M (2004) Relational investing and firm performance. J Financ Res 27:1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair M (1995) Ownership and control. Rethinking corporate governance for the twenty first century. The Bookings Institution, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis EP (2002) Institutional investors, corporate governance and the performance of the corporate sector. Econ Sys 26:202–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Duggal R, Millar JA (1999) Institutional ownership and firm performance: the case of bidder returns. J Corp Financ 5:103–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama E, French K (1983) Agency problems and residual claims. J Law Econ 26:327–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartzell JC, Starks LT (2003) Institutional investors and executive compensation. J Financ 58:2351–2374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isakov D, Wisskopf J-P (2014) Are founding families special blockholders? An investigation of controlling shareholder influence on firm performance. J Bank Financ 41:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta R, de-Silanes L, Schleifer A, Vishny RW (1997) Legal determinants of external finance. J Financ 52:1131–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louis K, Chan C, Lokonishok J (1993) Institutional trades and intraday stock price behavior. J Financ Econ 33:173–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monks RAG, Minow N (2001) Corporate governance, 2nd edn. Blackwell Business, Malden

    Google Scholar 

  • Porta L, Rafael FL-d-S, Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1998) Law and finance. J Polit Econ 61:1113–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porta L, Rafael FL-d-S, Shleifer A, Vishny RW (2002) Investor protection and corporate valuation. J Financ 57:1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prevost AK, Roa RP (2000) Of what value are shareholder proposals sponsored by public pension funds? J Bus 73:177–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renneboog L, Szilagyi PG (2011) The role of shareholder proposals in corporate governance. J Financ Econ 17:167–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose C (2005) Managerial ownership and firm performance of listed Danish firms – in search of the missing link. Eur Manag J 23(5):542–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose C (2007) Can institutional investors fix the corporate governance problem? – Some Danish evidence. J Manag Gov 11:405–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose C (2008) A critical analysis of the one share – one vote controversy. Int J Disclos Gov 5(2):126–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1997) A survey of corporate governance. J Financ 52:737–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen S, Rose C (2004) Do companies need owners? Foundation ownership and firm performance. Eur J Law Econ 18:343–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahal S, McConell JJ (2000) Do institutional investors exacerbate managerial myopia? J Corp Financ 6:307–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caspar Rose .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Rose, C. (2019). Concentrated Ownership. In: Marciano, A., Ramello, G.B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_533

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics