Encyclopedia of Law and Economics

2019 Edition
| Editors: Alain Marciano, Giovanni Battista Ramello

Harmonization: Consumer Protection

  • Franziska WeberEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_529

Abstract

This contribution gives an overview of law and economic works on consumer protection. It does so by taking three complementary angles: (1) assessing harmonization efforts regarding consumer protection in Europe, (2) presenting selected topics of substantive consumer law, and (3) analyzing the European consumer law enforcement from an economic point of view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Akerlof G (1979) The market for lemons: qualitative uncertainty and the market mechanism. Q J Econ 84(3):488–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayres I (2012) Regulating opt-out: an economic theory of altering rules. Yale Law J 121(8):2032–2117Google Scholar
  3. Bakos Y, Marotta-Wurgler F, Trossen DR (2014) Does anyone read the fine print? Consumer attention to standard-form contracts. J Legal Stud 43(1):1–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bar-Gill O, Ben-Shahar O (2013) Regulatory techniques in consumer protection: a critique of European consumer contract law. Common Mkt Law Rev 50:109–125Google Scholar
  5. Beales H, Craswell R, Salop S (1981) The efficient regulation of consumer information. J Law Econ 24:491–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker GS (1968) Crime and punishment: an economic approach. J Polit Econ 76:169–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowles R, Faure MG, Garoupa N (2008) The scope of criminal law and criminal sanctions an economic view and policy implications. J Law Soc 35(3):389–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cseres K (2012) Consumer protection in the European Union in regulation and economics. In: Van den Bergh R, Pacces A (eds) Regulation and economics, vol IX, 2nd edn, Encyclopaedia of law and economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 163–228Google Scholar
  9. De Geest G, Kovac M (2009) The formation of contracts in the draft common frame of reference. Eur Rev Private Law 17:113–132Google Scholar
  10. Eidenmüller H (2011) Why withdrawal rights? Eur Rev Contract Law 7:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eisenberg MA (2003) Disclosure in contract law. Calif Law R 91(6):1648–1691Google Scholar
  12. Emons W (1989) On the limitation of warranty duration. J Ind Econ 37(3):287–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Faure MG (2008) Towards a maximum harmonization of consumer contract law?!? Maastricht J Eur Comp Law 15(4):433–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Faure MG, Ogus AI, Philipsen NJ (2009) Curbing consumer financial losses: the economics of regulatory enforcement. Law Policy 31(2):161–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gómez FP (2006) The Unfair Commercial Practices Directive: A Law and Economics Perspective, European Review of Contract Law. Vol. 2 No. 1, 4–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gomez F, Ganuza JJ (2012) How to build European private law: an economic analysis of the lawmaking and harmonization dimensions in European private law. Eur J Law Econ 33:481–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (1982) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Keske S (2010) Group litigation in European competition law: a law and economics perspective. Intersentia, AntwerpGoogle Scholar
  19. Kotler P (1965) Behavioral models for analyzing buyers. J Market 29(4):37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kovac M (2011) Comparative contract law and economics. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Larouche P, Chirico F (eds) (2010) Economic analysis of the DCFR – the work of the economic impact group within CoPECL. Sellier European Law, MunichGoogle Scholar
  22. Luth HA (2010) Behavioural economics in consumer policy – the economic analysis of standard terms in consumer contracts revisited. Intersentia, AntwerpGoogle Scholar
  23. Luth HA, Cseres K (2010) The DCFR and consumer protection: an economic assessment. In: Larouche P, Chirico F (eds) Economic analysis of the DCFR – the work of the economic impact group within CoPECL. Sellier European Law, Munich, pp 35–273Google Scholar
  24. Mackaay E (2013) Law and economics for civil law systems. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marotta-Wurgler F (2007) What’s in a standard form contract? An empirical analysis of software license agreements. J Empirical Legal Stud 4:677–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Micklitz H-W, Stuyck J, Terryn E (2010) Cases, materials and text on consumer law. Hart, Oxford/PortlandGoogle Scholar
  27. Oates W (1972) Fiscal federalism. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Ogus AI (1994) Regulation: legal form and economic theory. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  29. Ogus AI (1999) Competition between national legal systems: a contribution of economic analysis to comparative law. Int Comp Law Q 48:405–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rekaiti P, Van den Bergh RJ (2000) Cooling-off periods in the consumer laws of the EC member states a comparative law and economics approach. J Consum Policy 23(4):307–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rischkowsky F, Döring T (2008) Consumer policy in a market economy: considerations from the perspective of the economics of information, the new institutional economics as well as behavioural economics. J Consum Policy 31:285–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schäfer H-B, Leyens P (2010) Judicial control of standard terms and European private law. In: Larouche P, Chirico F (eds) Economic analysis of the DCFR – the work of the economic impact group within CoPECL. Sellier European Law, Munich, pp 97–119Google Scholar
  33. Shavell S (1979) Risk sharing and incentives in the principal and agent relationship. Bell J Econ 10(1):55–73. The RAND CorporationCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shavell S (1993) The optimal structure of law enforcement. J Law Econ 36:255–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shavell S (1997) The fundamental divergence between the private and the social motive to use the legal system. J Legal Stud 16:575–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Simon HA (1957) Part IV in models of man. Wiley, New York, pp 196–279Google Scholar
  37. Stigler GJ (1961) The economics of information. J Polit Econ 69:213–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stiglitz J (2000) The contributions of the economics of information to the twentieth century economics. Q J Econ 114:1441–1478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sunstein CR, Reisch LA (2014) Automatically green: behavioral economics and environmental protection. Harvard Environ Law 38(1):127–158Google Scholar
  40. Sunstein CR, Thaler R (2009) Nudge improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness, 2nd edn. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  41. Thaler R, Sunstein CR (2003) Libertarian paternalism. Am Econ Rev 93(2):175–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tiebout CM (1956) A pure theory of local expenditures. J Polit Econ 64:416–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Van den Bergh RJ (1994) The subsidiarity principle in European Community Law: some insights from law and economics. Maastricht J Eur Comp Law 1:337–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Van den Bergh RJ (2000) Towards an institutional legal framework for regulatory competition in Europe. Kyklos 53(4):435–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Van den Bergh RJ (2002) Regulatory competition or harmonization of laws? Guidelines for the European regulator? In: Marciano A, Josselin J-M (eds) The economics of harmonizing European law. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 27–49Google Scholar
  46. Van den Bergh RJ (2007a) Should consumer law be publicly enforced? In: Van Boom WH, Loos MBM (eds) Collective enforcement of consumer law. Europa Law, Groningen, pp 179–203Google Scholar
  47. Van den Bergh RJ (2007b) The uneasy case for harmonizing consumer law. In: Heine K, Kerber W (eds) Zentralität und Dezentralität von Regulierung in Europa. Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart, pp 184–206Google Scholar
  48. Van den Bergh RJ (2013) Private enforcement of European competition law and the persisting collective action problem. Maastricht J Eur Comp Law 1:12–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Van den Bergh RJ, Visscher LT (2008a) The preventive function of collective actions for damages in consumer law. Erasmus Law Rev 1:5–30Google Scholar
  50. Van den Bergh RJ, Visscher LT (2008b) Optimal enforcement of safety law. In: de Mulder RV (ed) Mitigating risk in the context of safety and security. How relevant is a rational approach? Erasmus University, Rotterdam, pp 29–62Google Scholar
  51. Vandenberghe AMIB (2011) Behavioural approaches to contract law. In: De Geest G (ed) Contract law and economics, encyclopaedia of law and economics, 2nd edn. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 401–429Google Scholar
  52. Wagner G (2009) The common frame of reference: a view from law and economics. Sellier European Law, MunichCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wagner G (2014) Private law enforcement through ADR: wonder drug or snake oil? Common Mkt Law Rev 51:165–194Google Scholar
  54. Weber F (2014) The law and economics of enforcing European consumer law – a comparative analysis of package travel and misleading advertising, Markets and the law series. Ashgate – Gower – Lund Humphries, Farnham, SurreyGoogle Scholar
  55. Werth K (2011) Warranties in contract law and economics. In: De Geest G (ed) Contract law and economics, encyclopaedia of law and economics, 2nd edn. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 256–277Google Scholar
  56. Williamson O (1975) Markets and hierarchies, analysis and antitrust implications: a study in the economics of internal organization. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Law, Institute of Law and EconomicsUniversity of HamburgHamburgGermany